Top Cited Awards

The Hydrological Processes Awards for top cited paper and top cited invited commentary are presented to those papers recieving the most citations during the year after they are published in an issue

Top Cited Paper Awards:

2024

Can machine learning accelerate process understanding and decision-relevant predictions of river water quality?

Charuleka Varadharajan, Alison P. Appling, Bhavna Arora, Danielle S. Christianson, Valerie C. Hendrix, Vipin Kumar, Aranildo R. Lima, Juliane Müller, Samantha Oliver, Mohammed Ombadi, Talita Perciano, Jeffrey M Sadler, Helen Weierbach, Jared D. Willard, Zexuan Xu, Jacob Zwart (2022)

Hydrol. Process., 36: e14565. doi: 10.1002/hyp.14565

2023

Northern landscapes in transition: Evidence, approach and ways forward using the Krycklan Catchment Study

Hjalmar Laudon, Eliza Maher Hasselquist, Matthias Peichl, Kim Lindgren, Ryan Sponseller, Fredrik Lidman, Lenka Kuglerová, Niles J. Hasselquist, Kevin Bishop, Mats B. Nilsson, Anneli M. Ågren (2021)

Hydrol. Process., 35: e14170. doi: 10.1002/hyp.14170

2022

Linking hydrologic signatures to hydrologic processes: A review

Hillary McMillan (2020)

Hydrol. Process., 34: 1393-1409. doi: 10.1002/hyp.13632

2021

Spatio‐temporal heterogeneity in soil water stable isotopic composition and its ecohydrologic implications in semiarid ecosystems

Erik J. Oerter, Gabriel J. Bowen (2019)

Hydrol. Process., 33: 1724-1738. doi: 10.1002/hyp.13434

2020

Testing slope effect on flow resistance equation for mobile bed rills

Costanza Di Stefano, Vito Ferro, Vincenzo Palmeri, Vincenzo Pampalone (2018)

Hydrol. Process., 32: 664-671. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11448

2019

Impact of lithology and soil properties on abandoned dryland terraces during the early stages of soil erosion by water in south-east Spain

Carlos Martínez‐Hernández, Jesús Rodrigo‐Comino, Asunción Romero‐Díaz (2017)

Hydrol. Process., 31: 3095-3109. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11251

2018

Gauging extreme floods on YouTube: application of LSPIV to home movies for the post‐event determination of stream discharges

Raphaël Le Boursicaud, Lionel Pénard, Alexandre Hauet, Fabien Thollet, Jérôme Le Coz (2016)

Hydrol. Process., 30: 90–105. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10532

2017

Conceptual modelling to assess how the interplay of hydrological connectivity, catchment storage and tracer dynamics controls nonstationary water age estimates

Christian Birkel, Chris Soulsby and Doerthe Tetzlaff (2015)

Hydrol. Process., 29, 2956–2969. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10414.

2016

How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment – temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance

Björn Guse, Dominik E. Reusser and Nicola Fohrer (2014)

Hydrol. Process., 28: 2651-2670. doi:10.1002/hyp.9777

Top Cited Invited Commentary Awards

2024

Potential effects of cryogenic extraction biases on plant water source partitioning inferred from xylem-water isotope ratios

Scott T. Allen, James W. Kirchner (2022)

Hydrol. Process., 36: e14483. doi: 10.1002/hyp.14483

2023

Non-stationary control of the NAO on European rainfall and its implications for water resource management

William Rust, John P. Bloomfield, Mark O. Cuthbert, Ron Corstanje, Ian P. Holman (2021)

Hydrol. Process., 35: e14099. doi: 10.1002/hyp.14099

2022

Anthropocene flooding: Challenges for science and society

Saman Razavi, Patricia Gober, Holger R. Maier, Roy Brouwer, Howard Wheater (2020)

Hydrol. Process., 34: 1996-2000. doi: 10.1002/hyp.17323

2021

A water cycle for the Anthropocene

Benjamin W. Abbott, Kevin Bishop, Jay P. Zarnetske, David M. Hannah, Rebecca J. Frei, Camille Minaudo, F.Stuart Chapin III, Stefan Krause, Lafe Conner, David Ellison, Sarah E. Godsey, Stephen Plont, Jean Marçais, Tamara Kolbe, Amanda Huebner, Tyler Hampton, Sen Gu, Madeline Buhman, Sayedeh Sara Sayedi, Ovidiu Ursache, Melissa Chapin, Kathryn D. Henderson, Gilles Pinay (2019)

Hydrol. Process., 33: 3046-3052. doi: 10.1002/hyp.13544

2020

Upper And Lower Benchmarks In Hydrological Modelling

Jan Seibert, Marc J. P. Vis, Elizabeth Lewis, H.J. van Meerveld (2018)

Hydrol. Process., 32: 1120-1125. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11476

2019

Taming the flood - How far can we go with trees?

Chris Soulsby, Jonathan Dick, Bernhard Scheliga, Doerthe Tetzlaff (2017)

Hydrol. Process., 31: 3122-3126. doi: 10.1002/hyp.11226

2018

Hydrology needed to manage droughts: the 2015 European case

Henny A.J. Van Lanen, Gregor Laaha, Daniel G. Kingston, Tobias Gauster, Monica Ionita, Jean‐Philippe Vidal, Radek Vlnas, Lena M. Tallaksen, Kerstin Stahl, Jamie Hannaford, Claire Delus, Miriam Fendekova, Luis Mediero, Christel Prudhomme, Ekaterina Rets, Renata J. Romanowicz, Sébastien Gailliez, Wai Kwok Wong, Mary‐Jeanne Adler, Veit Blauhut, Laurie Caillouet, Silvia Chelcea, Natalia Frolova, Lukas Gudmundsson, Martin Hanel, Klaus Haslinger, Maria Kireeva, Marzena Osuch, Eric Sauquet, James H. Stagge and Anne F. Van Loon (2016)

Hydrol. Process., 30: 3097–3104. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10838

2017

Hyper‐resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next?

Marc F. P. Bierkens, Victoria A. Bell, Peter Burek, Nathaniel Chaney, Laura E. Condon, Cédric H. David, Ad de Roo, Petra Döll, Niels Drost, James S. Famiglietti, Martina Flörke, David J. Gochis, Paul Houser, Rolf Hut, Jessica Keune, Stefan Kollet, Reed M. Maxwell, John T. Reager, Luis Samaniego, Edward Sudick, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Nick van de Giesen, Hessel Winsemius and Eric F. Wood (2015)

Hydrol. Process., 29, 310–320, doi: 10.1002/hyp.10391

2016

Irrigation‐induced changes in potential evaporation: more attention is needed

Songjun Han, Qiuhong Tang, Di Xu and Shaoli Wang (2014)

Hydrol. Process., 28: 2717-2720. doi:10.1002/hyp.10108