Shape and evolution of thermostable protein structure
Ryan G. Coleman
The Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kim A. Sharp
The Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, 37th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059===Search for more papers by this authorRyan G. Coleman
The Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kim A. Sharp
The Johnson Research Foundation, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Genomics and Computational Biology Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, 37th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6059===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Organisms evolved at high temperatures must maintain their proteins' structures in the face of increased thermal disorder. This challenge results in differences in residue utilization and overall structure. Focusing on thermostable/mesostable pairs of homologous structures, we have examined these differences using novel geometric measures: specifically burial depth (distance from the molecular surface to each atom) and travel depth (distance from the convex hull to the molecular surface that avoids the protein interior). These along with common metrics like packing and Wadell Sphericity are used to gain insight into the constraints experienced by thermophiles. Mean travel depth of hyperthermostable proteins is significantly less than that of their mesostable counterparts, indicating smaller, less numerous and less deep pockets. The mean burial depth of hyperthermostable proteins is significantly higher than that of mesostable proteins indicating that they bury more atoms further from the surface. The burial depth can also be tracked on the individual residue level, adding a finer level of detail to the standard exposed surface area analysis. Hyperthermostable proteins for the first time are shown to be more spherical than their mesostable homologues, regardless of when and how they adapted to extreme temperature. Additionally, residue specific burial depth examinations reveal that charged residues stay unburied, most other residues are slightly more buried and Alanine is more significantly buried in hyperthermostable proteins. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Stetter KO. Hyperthermophiles in the history of life. Philos Trans R Soc B 2006; 361: 1837–1843.
- 2 Nisbet EG,Sleep NH. The habitat and nature of early life. Nature 2001; 409: 1083–1091.
- 3 Puigbòa P,Pasamontesa A,Garcia-Vallve S. Gaining and losing the thermophilic adaptation in prokaryotes. Trends Genet 2008; 24: 10–14.
- 4 Atomi H. Recent progress towards the application of hyperthermophiles and their enzymes Curr Opin Chem Biol 2005; 9: 166–173.
- 5 Greaves RB,Warwicker J. Mechanisms for stabilisation and the maintenance of solubility in proteins from thermophiles. BMC Struct Biol 2007; 7: 1–23.
- 6 Yano JK,Poulos TL. New understandings of thermostable and peizostable enzymes. Curr Opin Biotech 2003; 14: 360–365.
- 7 Berezovsky IN,Shakhnovich EI. Physics and evolution of thermophilic adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 12742–12747.
- 8 Vogt G,Argos P. Protein thermal stability: hydogren bonds or internal packing? Fold Des 1997; 2: S40–S46.
- 9 Vogt G,Woell S,Argos P. Protein thermal stability, hydrogen bonds, and ion pairs. J Mol Biol 1997; 269: 631–643.
- 10 Szilágyi A,Závodszky P. Structural differences between mesophilic, moderately thermophilic and extremely thermophilic protein subunits: results of a comprehensive survey. Structure 2000; 8: 493–504.
- 11 Glyakina AV,Garbuzynskiy SO,Lobanov MY,Galzitskaya OV. Different packing of external residues can explain differences in the thermostability of proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 2231–2238.
- 12 Robinson-Rechavia M,Alibésb A,Godzik A. Contribution of electrostatic interactions. Compactness and quaternary structure to protein thermostability: lessons from structural genomics of Thermotoga maritime. J Mol Biol 2006; 356: 547–557.
- 13 Karshikoff A,Ladenstein R. Ion pairs and the thermotolerance of proteins from hyperthermophiles: a “traffic rule” for hot roads. Trends Biochem Sci 2001; 26: 550–556.
- 14 Xiao L,Honig B. Electrostatic contributions to the stability of hyperthermophilic proteins. J Mol Biol 1999; 289: 1435–1444.
- 15 Alsop E,Silver M,Livesay DR. Optimized electrostatic surfaces parallel increased thermostability. Prot Eng 2003; 16: 871–874.
- 16 Capistran-Licea VM,Millan-Pacheco C,Pastor N. Thermal adaptation strategies used by TBP [abstract]. Biophys J 2009; 96: 331a.
- 17 Paiardini A,Sali R,Bossa F,Pascarella S. “Hot cores” in proteins: comparative analysis of the apolar contact area in structures from hyper/thermophilic and mesophilic organisms BMC Struct Biol 2008; 8: 14–27.
- 18 Rader AJ. Thermostabilization due to rigidity: a case study of rubredoxin [abstract]. Biophys J 2009; 96: 330a.
- 19 Cambillau C,Claverie J-M. Structural and genomics correlates of hyperthermostability. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 32383–32386.
- 20 Fukuchi S,Nishikawa K. Protein surface amino acid compositions distinctively differ between thermophilic and mesophilic bacteria. J Mol Biol 2001; 309: 835–843.
- 21 Lin Y-S. Using a strategy based on the concept of convergent evolution to identify residue substitutions responsible for thermal adaptation. Proteins 2008; 73: 53–62.
- 22 Karshikoff A,Ladenstein R. Proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms essentially do not differ in packing. Protein Eng 1998; 11: 867–872.
- 23 Coleman RG,Sharp KA. Travel depth, a new shape descriptor for macromolecules: application to ligand binding. J Mol Biol 2006; 362: 441–458.
- 24 Ogata Y,Imai E-I,Honda H,Hatori K,Matsuno K. Hydrothermal circulation of seawater through hot vents and contribution of interface chemistry to prebiotic synthesis. Orig Life Evol Biosph 2000; 30: 527–537.
- 25 Nelson KE,Clayton RA,Gill SR,Gwinn ML,Dodson RJ,Haft DH,Hickey EK,Peterson JD,Nelson WC,Ketchum KA,McDonald L,Utterback TR,Malek JA,Linher KD,Garrett MM,Stewart AM,Cotton MD,Pratt MS,Phillips CA,Richardson D,Heidelberg J,Sutton GG,Fleischmann RD,Eisen JA,White O,Salzberg SL,Smith HO,Venter JC,Fraser CM. Evidence for lateral gene transfer between archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritima. Nature 1999; 399: 323–329.
- 26 Berman HM,Westbrook J,Feng Z,Gilliland G,Bhat TN,Weissig H,Shindyalov IN,Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl Acid Res 2000; 28: 235–242.
- 27 Bondi A. van der Waals volumes and radii. J Phys Chem 1964; 68: 441–451.
- 28 Richards FM. The interpretation of protein structures: Total volume, group volume distributions and packing density. J Mol Biol 1974; 82: 1–14.
- 29 Tsai J,Taylor R,Chothia C,Gerstein M. The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes. J Mol Biol 1999; 290: 253–266.
- 30 Poupon A. Voronoi and Voronoi-related tessellations in studies of protein structure and interaction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004; 14: 233–241.
- 31 Levitt M,Gerstein M,Huang ES,Subbiah S,Tsai J. Protein folding: the endgame. Ann Rev Biochem 1997; 66: 549–579.
- 32 Gerstein M,Lynden-Bell RM. What is the natural boundary of a protein in solution? J Mol Biol 1993; 230: 641–650.
- 33 Gerstein M,Tsai J,Levitt M. The volume of atoms on the protein surface: calculated from simulation, using Voronoi Polyhedra. J Mol Biol 1995; 249: 955–966.
- 34 Voronoi GF. Nouveles applications des paramétres continus á la théorie de formes quadratiques. J Reine Angew Math 1908; 134: 198–287.
- 35
de Berg M,van Kreveld M,Overmars M,Schwarskopf O.
Computational geometry: algorithms and applications.
Berlin:
Springer;
2000.
10.1007/978-3-662-04245-8 Google Scholar
- 36 Liang J,Dill KA. Are proteins well-packed? Biophys J 2001; 86: 751–766.
- 37 Gerstein M,Chothia C. Packing at the protein-water interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 10167–10172.
- 38
Dijkstra EW.
A note on two problems in connexion with graphs.
Numer Math
1959;
1:
269–271.
10.1007/BF01386390 Google Scholar
- 39 Coleman RG,Sharp KA. Finding and characterizing tunnels in macromolecules with application to ion channels and pores. Biophys J 2009; 96: 632–645.
- 40 Pintar A,Carugo O,Pongor S. DPX: for the analysis of the protein core. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 313–314.
- 41 Pintar A,Carugo O,Pongor S. Atom depth as a descriptor of the protein interior. Biophys J 2003; 84: 2553–2561.
- 42 Varrazzo D,Bernini A,Spiga O,Ciutti A,Chiellini S,Venditti V,Bracci L,Niccolai N. Three-dimensional computation of atom depth in complex molecular structures. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2856–2860.
- 43 Chakravarty S,Varadarajan R. Residue depth: a novel parameter for the analysis of protein structure and stability. Structure 1999; 7: 723–732.
- 44
Yuan Z,Wang Z-X.
Quantifying the relationship of protein burying depth and sequence
Proteins
2007;
70:
509–516.
10.1002/prot.21545 Google Scholar
- 45 Liu S,Zhang C,Liang S,Zhou Y. Fold recognition by concurrent use of solvent accessibility and residue depth. Proteins 2007; 68: 636–645.
- 46 Pintar A,Carugo O,Pongor S. Atom depth in protein structure and function. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28: 593–597.
- 47 Huang ES,Subbiah S,Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J Mol Biol 1995; 252: 709–720.
- 48
Pereira de Araújo AF,Gomes ALC,Bursztyn AA,Shakhnovich EI.
Native atomic burials, supplemented by physically motivated hydrogen bond constraints, contain sufficient information to determine the tertiary structure of small globular proteins.
Proteins
2007;
70:
971–983.
10.1002/prot.21571 Google Scholar
- 49 Ben-Shimon A,Eisenstein M. Looking at enzymes from the inside out: the proximity of catalytic residues to the molecular centroid can be used for detection of active sites and enzyme-ligand interfaces. J Mol Biol 2005; 351: 309–326.
- 50 del Sol A,Fujihashi H,Amoros D,Nussinov R. Residue centrality, functionally important residues, and active site shape: analysis of enzyme and non-enzyme families. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 2120–2128.
- 51 Amitai G,Shemesh A,Sitbon E,Shklar M,Netanely D,Venger I,Pietrokovski S. Network analysis of protein structure identifies functional residues. J Mol Biol 2004; 344: 1135–1146.
- 52 Brinda KV,Vishveshwara S. A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. Biophys J 2005; 89: 4159–4170.
- 53 Wadell H. Volume, shape and roundness of quartz particles. J Geol 1935; 43: 250–280.
- 54 Fisher RA. “The Coefficient of Racial Likeness” and the future of craniometry. J R Anthropol Inst 1936; 66: 57–63.
- 55 Wang W,Cho HS,Kim R,Jancarik J,Yokota H,Nguyen HH,Grigoriev IV,Wemmer DE,Kim SH. Structural characterization of the reaction pathway in phosphoserine phosphatase: crystallographic “snapshots” of intermediate states. J Mol Biol 2002; 319: 421–431.
- 56 Peeraer Y,Rabijns A,Verboven C,Collet JF,Van Schaftingen E,De Ranter C. High-resolution structure of human phosphoserine phosphatase in open conformation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2003; 59: 971–977.
- 57 DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. San Carlos, California: DeLano Scientific; 2002.
- 58 Yee A,Chang X,Pineda-Lucena A,Wu B,Semesi A,Le B,Ramelot T,Lee GM,Bhattacharyya S,Gutierrez P,Denisov A,Lee CH,Cort JR,Kozlov G,Liao J,Finak G,Chen L,Wishart D,Lee W,McIntosh LP,Gehring K,Kennedy MA,Edwards AM,Arrowsmith CH. An NMR approach to structural proteomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1825–1830.
- 59 Klapper I,Hagstrom R,Fine R,Sharp K,Honig B. Focusing of electrical fields in the active site of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase: effects of ionic strength and amino-acid modifications. Proteins 1986; 1: 47–59.
- 60 Yang Q,Sharp KA. Building alternate protein structures using the elastic network model. Protein Sci 2009; 74: 682–700.
- 61 Canutescu AA,Shelenkov AA,Dunbrack RL,Jr,Canutescu AA,Shelenkov Dunbrack RL,Jr. A graph theory algorithm for protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 2001–2014.
- 62 Kono H,Saven JG. Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. J Mol Biol 2001; 306: 607–628.
- 63 Shah PS,Hom GK,Ross SA,Lassila JK,Crowhurst KA,Mayo SL. Full-sequence Computational design and solution structure of a thermostable protein variant. J Mol Biol 2007; 372: 1–6.
- 64 Lehmann M,Wyss M. Engineering proteins for thermostability: the use of sequence alignments versus rational design and directed evolution Curr Opin Biotech 2001; 12: 371–375.
- 65 van der Burg B,Eijsink VGH. Selection of mutations for increased protein stability Curr Opin Biotech 2002; 13: 333–337.
- 66 DiTursi MK,Kwon S-J,Reeder PJ,Dordick JS. Bioinformatics-driven, rational engineering of protein thermostability. Protein Eng Des Sel 2006; 19: 517–524.
- 67 Danciulescu C,Ladenstein R,Nilsson L. Dynamic arrangement of ion pairs and individual contributions to the thermal stability of the cofactor-binding domain of glutamate dehydrogenase from Thermotoga maritima. Biochem 2007; 46: 8537–8549.
- 68 Henzler-Wildman KA,Lei M,Thai V,Kerns SJ,Karplus M,Kern D. A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis. Nature 2007; 450: 913–916.
- 69 Hollien J,Marqusee S. Structural distribution of stability in a thermophilic enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 13674–13678.
- 70 Luke KA,Higgins CL,Wittung-Stafshede P. Thermodynamic stability and folding of proteins from hyperthermophilic organisms. FEBS 2007; 274: 4023–4033.