Volume 32, Issue 4 pp. 436-440
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The level of agreement between rapid-on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspirate and surgical histological diagnosis in gastrointestinal lesions

Tawfik Khoury

Corresponding Author

Tawfik Khoury

Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel

Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel

Correspondence

Tawfik Khoury, Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel; Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Wisam Sbeit

Wisam Sbeit

Department of Gastroenterology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel

Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 May 2021

Abstract

Objective

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the main tool for biopsy via fine needle aspiration (FNA) from gastrointestinal (GI) lesions including pancreatic, upper gastrointestinal, and adjacent lesions. The variable diagnostic yield and delay until the final pathological results can affect treatment planning and cause patient anxiety. We aimed to assess the agreement of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of EUS-FNA with the surgical histological diagnosis of patients who underwent resection.

Method

A retrospective study was performed including all patients 18 years or older who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE for GI lesions. For patients who underwent surgical resection, the correlation between ROSE and the surgical histological diagnosis was evaluated with the kappa coefficient.

Results

Overall, 73 patients who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE were included, of whom 22 (30.1%) had curative resection. The final pathological diagnosis from surgery showed 17 malignant and 5 benign lesions. Among the benign lesions, ROSE correctly identified 2 (diagnostic accuracy of 40%), while among the malignant lesions, ROSE correctly identified 14 (diagnostic accuracy of 82.4%), yielding a fair kappa coefficient of 0.366 (95% CI 0.035-0.697). When classifying the lesions as either malignant vs benign or suspicious of malignancy, the kappa coefficient increased to 0.58 (95% CI 0.180-0.975) for the subgroup of pancreatic lesions, with diagnostic accuracy of 81.2% for the malignant category.

Conclusions

A high level of agreement for malignancy was found between FNA-EUS with ROSE and the final surgical histological diagnosis. ROSE can be used as an adjuvant diagnostic tool to optimise patient management and decrease delay-related anxiety.

Abstract

Accurate and rapid diagnosis of gastrointestinal and especially pancreatic lesions by EUS-FNA is crucial to optimise patient management. As rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) with EUS-FNA was found highly comparable for malignancy to the final histological diagnosis in surgical cases, ROSE can be used as a reliable tool for immediate treatment planning and to reduce patient anxiety.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest regarding this manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data are available from the Gastroenterology department at Galilee Medical Center and will be provided upon request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.