Identification of specificity and promiscuity of PDZ domain interactions through their dynamic behavior
Z. Nevin Gerek
Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Search for more papers by this authorOzlem Keskin
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
S. Banu Ozkan
Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Arizona State University, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504===Search for more papers by this authorZ. Nevin Gerek
Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Search for more papers by this authorOzlem Keskin
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
S. Banu Ozkan
Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Department of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
Arizona State University, Department of Physics, P.O. Box 871504, Tempe, AZ 85287-1504===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
PDZ domains (PDZs), the most common interaction domain proteins, play critical roles in many cellular processes. PDZs perform their job by binding specific protein partners. However, they are very promiscuous, binding to more than one protein, yet selective at the same time. We examined the binding related dynamics of various PDZs to have insight about their specificity and promiscuity. We used full atomic normal mode analysis and a modified coarse-grained elastic network model to compute the binding related dynamics. In the latter model, we introduced specificity for each single parameter constant and included the solvation effect implicitly. The modified model, referred to as specific-Gaussian Network Model (s-GNM), highlights some interesting differences in the conformational changes of PDZs upon binding to Class I or Class II type peptides. By clustering the residue fluctuation profiles of PDZs, we have shown: (i) binding selectivities can be discriminated from their dynamics, and (ii) the dynamics of different structural regions play critical roles for Class I and Class II specificity. s-GNM is further tested on a dual-specific PDZ which showed only Class I specificity when a point mutation exists on the βA-βB loop. We observe that the binding dynamics change consistently in the mutated and wild type structures. In addition, we found that the binding induced fluctuation profiles can be used to discriminate the binding selectivity of homolog structures. These results indicate that s-GNM can be a powerful method to study the changes in binding selectivities for mutant or homolog PDZs. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
PROT_22492_sm_suppinfo.doc431 KB | Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Fan JS,Zhang M. Signaling complex organization by PDZ domain proteins. Neurosignals 2002; 11: 315–321.
- 2 Nourry C,Grant SG,Borg JP. PDZ domain proteins: plug and play! Sci STKE 2003; 2003: RE7.
- 3 Hung AY,Sheng M. PDZ domains: structural modules for protein complex assembly. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 5699–5702.
- 4 van Ham M,Hendriks W. PDZ domains-glue and guide. Mol Biol Rep 2003; 30: 69–82.
- 5 Appleton BA,Zhang Y,Wu P,Yin JP,Hunziker W,Skelton NJ,Sidhu SS,Wiesmann C. Comparative structural analysis of the Erbin PDZ domain and the first PDZ domain of ZO-1. Insights into determinants of PDZ domain specificity. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 22312–22320.
- 6 Birrane G,Chung J,Ladias JA. Novel mode of ligand recognition by the Erbin PDZ domain. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 1399–1402.
- 7 Chen Q,Niu X,Xu Y,Wu J,Shi Y. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the AF-6 PDZ domain/Bcr peptide complex. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 1053–1062.
- 8 Daniels DL,Cohen AR,Anderson JM,Brunger AT. Crystal structure of the hCASK PDZ domain reveals the structural basis of class II PDZ domain target recognition. Nat Struct Biol 1998; 5: 317–325.
- 9 Dev KK. PDZ domain protein-protein interactions: a case study with PICK1. Curr Top Med Chem 2007; 7: 3–20.
- 10 Elkins JM,Papagrigoriou E,Berridge G,Yang X,Phillips C,Gileadi C,Savitsky P,Doyle DA. Structure of PICK1 and other PDZ domains obtained with the help of self-binding C-terminal extensions. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 683–694.
- 11 Harris BZ,Lim WA. Mechanism and role of PDZ domains in signaling complex assembly. J Cell Sci 2001; 114(Part 18): 3219–3231.
- 12 Hillier BJ,Christopherson KS,Prehoda KE,Bredt DS,Lim WA. Unexpected modes of PDZ domain scaffolding revealed by structure of nNOS-syntrophin complex. Science 1999; 284: 812–815.
- 13 Im YJ,Lee JH,Park SH,Park SJ,Rho SH,Kang GB,Kim E,Eom SH. Crystal structure of the Shank PDZ-ligand complex reveals a class I PDZ interaction and a novel PDZ-PDZ dimerization. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 48099–48104.
- 14 Im YJ,Park SH,Rho SH,Lee JH,Kang GB,Sheng M,Kim E,Eom SH. Crystal structure of GRIP1 PDZ6-peptide complex reveals the structural basis for class II PDZ target recognition and PDZ domain-mediated multimerization. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 8501–8507.
- 15 Kang BS,Cooper DR,Devedjiev Y,Derewenda U,Derewenda ZS. Molecular roots of degenerate specificity in syntenin's PDZ2 domain: reassessment of the PDZ recognition paradigm. Structure 2003; 11: 845–853.
- 16 Karthikeyan S,Leung T,Birrane G,Webster G,Ladias JA. Crystal structure of the PDZ1 domain of human Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor provides insights into the mechanism of carboxyl-terminal leucine recognition by class I PDZ domains. J Mol Biol 2001; 308: 963–973.
- 17 Karthikeyan S,Leung T,Ladias JA. Structural determinants of the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor interaction with the beta 2 adrenergic and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 18973–18978.
- 18 Laura RP,Witt AS,Held HA,Gerstner R,Deshayes K,Koehler MF,Kosik KS,Sidhu SS,Lasky LA. The Erbin PDZ domain binds with high affinity and specificity to the carboxyl termini of delta-catenin and ARVCF. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 12906–12914.
- 19 Sallee NA,Yeh BJ,Lim WA. Engineering modular protein interaction switches by sequence overlap. J Am Chem Soc 2007; 129: 4606–4611.
- 20 Tochio H,Hung F,Li M,Bredt DS,Zhang M. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the second PDZ domain of postsynaptic density-95. J Mol Biol 2000; 295: 225–237.
- 21 Lockless SW,Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999; 286: 295–299.
- 22 Zimmermann P. The prevalence and significance of PDZ domain-phophoinositide interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006; 1761: 947–956.
- 23 Zimmermann P,Meerschaert K,Reekmans G,Leenaerts I,Small JV,Vandekerckhove J,David G,Gettemans J. PIP2-PDZ domain binding controls the association of syntenin with the plasma membrane. Mol Cell 2002; 9: 1215–1225.
- 24 DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Palo Alto, CA: DeLano Scientific; 2002 (http://www.pymol.org).
- 25 Songyang Z,Fanning AS,Fu C,Xu J,Marfatia SM,Chishti AH,Crompton A,Chan AC,Anderson JM,Cantley LC. Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science 1997; 275: 73–77.
- 26 Bezprozvanny I,Maximov A. Classification of PDZ domains. FEBS Lett 2001; 509: 457–462.
- 27 Kurakin A,Swistowski A,Wu SC,Bredesen DE. The PDZ domain as a complex adaptive system. Plos Comput Biol 2007; 2: e953.
- 28 Vaccaro P,Dente L. PDZ domains: troubles in classification. FEBS Lett 2002; 512: 345–346.
- 29 Fuentes EJ,Der CJ,Lee AL. Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain. J Mol Biol 2004; 335: 1105–1115.
- 30 Basdevant N,Weinstein H,Ceruso M. Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study. J Am Chem Soc 2006; 128: 12766–12777.
- 31 Cecconi F,Rios PDL,Piazza F. Diffusion-limited unbinding of small peptides from PDZ domains. J Phys Chem B 2007; 111: 11057–11063.
- 32 De Los Rios P,Cecconi F,Pretre A,Dietler G,Michielin O,Piazza F,Juanico B. Functional dynamics of PDZ binding domains: a normal-mode analysis. Biophys J 2005; 89: 14–21.
- 33 Dhulesia A,Gsponer J,Vendruscolo M. Mapping of two networks of residues that exhibit structural and dynamical changes upon binding in a PDZ domain protein. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130: 8931–8939.
- 34 Giallourakis C,Cao Z,Green T,Wachtel H,Xie X,Lopez-Illasaca M,Daly M,Rioux J,Xavier R. A molecular-properties-based approach to understanding PDZ domain proteins and PDZ ligands. Genome Res 2006; 16: 1056–1072.
- 35 Kempkens O,Medina E,Fernandez-Ballester G,Ozuyaman S,Le Bivic A,Serrano L,Knust E. Computer modelling in combination with in vitro studies reveals similar binding affinities of Drosophila Crumbs for the PDZ domains of Stardust and DmPar-6. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 85: 753–767.
- 36 Niv MY,Weinstein H. A flexible docking procedure for the exploration of peptide binding selectivity to known structures and homology models of PDZ domains. J Am Chem Soc 2005; 127: 14072–14079.
- 37 Ota N,Agard DA. Intramolecular signaling pathways revealed by modeling anisotropic thermal diffusion. J Mol Biol 2005; 351: 345–354.
- 38 Reina J,Lacroix E,Hobson SD,Fernandez-Ballester G,Rybin V,Schwab MS,Serrano L,Gonzalez C. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nat Struct Biol 2002; 9: 621–627.
- 39 Sharp K,Skinner JJ. Pump-probe molecular dynamics as a tool for studying protein motion and long range coupling. Proteins 2006; 65: 347–361.
- 40 Tang C,Schwieters CD,Clore GM. Open-to-closed transition in apo maltose-binding protein observed by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 2007; 449: 1078–1082.
- 41 Eisenmesser EZ,Millet O,Labeikovsky W,Korzhnev DM,Wolf-Watz M,Bosco DA,Skalicky JJ,Kay LE,Kern D. Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis. Nature 2005; 438: 117–121.
- 42 Volkman BF,Lipson D,Wemmer DE,Kern D. Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. Science 2001; 291: 2429–2433.
- 43 Atilgan AR,Durell SR,Jernigan RL,Demirel MC,Keskin O,Bahar I. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 2001; 80: 505–515.
- 44 Bahar I,Atilgan AR,Demirel MC,Erman B. Vibrational dynamics of folded proteins: significance of slow and fast motions in relation to function and stability. Phys Rev Lett 1998; 80: 2733–2736.
- 45 Bahar I,Atilgan AR,Erman B. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. Fold Des 1997; 2: 173–181.
- 46 Keskin O,Bahar I,Flatow D,Covell DG,Jernigan RL. Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. Biochemistry 2002; 41: 491–501.
- 47 Keskin O,Jernigan RL,Bahar I. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. Biophys J 2000; 78: 2093–2106.
- 48 Kondrashov DA,Cui Q,Phillips GN,Jr. Optimization and evaluation of a coarse-grained model of protein motion using x-ray crystal data. Biophys J 2006; 91: 2760–2767.
- 49 Rader AJ, Vlad DH, Bahar I. Maturation dynamics of bacteriophage HK97 capsid. Structure 2005; 13: 413–421.
- 50 Sen TZ,Feng Y,Garcia JV,Kloczkowski A,Jernigan RL. The extent of cooperativity of protein motions observed with elastic network models is similar for atomic and coarser-grained models. J Chem Theory Comput 2006; 2: 696–704.
- 51 Sen TZ,Jernigan RL. Optimizing cutoff distances and spring constants for the Gaussian Network Model of ATP-binding proteins. In: IBaQ Cui, editor. Normal mode analysis: theory and applications to biological and chemical systems. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2006. pp 171–186.
- 52 Tama F,Brooks CL. The mechanism and pathway of pH induced swelling in cowpea chlorotic mottle virus. J Mol Biol 2002; 318: 733–747.
- 53 Tama F,Brooks CL. Diversity and identity of mechanical properties of icosahedral viral capsids studied with elastic network normal mode analysis. J Mol Biol 2005; 345: 299–314.
- 54 Delarue M,Sanejouand YH. Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. J Mol Biol 2002; 320: 1011–1024.
- 55 Ikeguchi M,Ueno J,Sato M,Kidera A. Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys Rev Lett 2005; 94: 078102.
- 56 Keskin O. Binding induced conformational changes of proteins correlate with their intrinsic fluctuations. BMC Struct Biol 2007; 7: 31.
- 57 Kundu S,Jernigan RL. Molecular mechanism of domain swapping in proteins: an analysis of slower motions. Biophys J 2004; 86: 3846–3854.
- 58 Tama F,Sanejouand YH. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng 2001; 14: 1–6.
- 59 Tobi D,Bahar I. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 18908–18913.
- 60 Zheng W,Brooks BR. Normal-modes-based prediction of protein conformational changes guided by distance constraints. Biophys J 2005; 88: 3109–3117.
- 61 Demirel MC,Atilgan AR,Jernigan RL,Erman B,Bahar I. Identification of kinetically hot residues in proteins. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 2522–2532.
- 62 Haliloglu T,Keskin O,Ma B,Nussinov R. How similar are protein folding and protein binding nuclei? Examination of vibrational motions of energy hot spots and conserved residues. Biophys J 2005; 88: 1552–1559.
- 63 Haliloglu T,Seyrek E,Erman B. Prediction of binding sites in receptor-ligand complexes with the Gaussian Network Model. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 228102.
- 64 Rader AJ,Anderson G,Isin B,Khorana HG,Bahar I,Klein-Seetharaman J. Identification of core amino acids stabilizing rhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 7246–7251.
- 65 Lu Q,Sun EE,Klein RS,Flanagan JG. Ephrin-B reverse signaling is mediated by a novel PDZ-RGS protein and selectively inhibits G protein-coupled chemoattraction. Cell 2001; 105: 69–79.
- 66 Long JF,Feng W,Wang R,Chan LN,Ip FC,Xia J,Ip NY,Zhang M. Autoinhibition of X11/Mint scaffold proteins revealed by the closed conformation of the PDZ tandem. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2005; 12: 722–728.
- 67 Berman HM,Westbrook J,Feng Z,Gilliland G,Bhat TN,Weissig H,Shindyalov IN,Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235–242.
- 68 Brooks BR,Bruccoleri RE,Olafson BD,States DJ,Swaminathan S,Karplus M. Charmm—a Program for macromolecular energy. Minimization, and dynamics calculations J Comput Chem 1983; 4: 187–217.
- 69 Masunov A,Lazaridis T. Potentials of mean force between ionizable amino acid side chains in water. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125: 1722–1730.
- 70 Brooks B,Karplus M. Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80: 6571–6575.
- 71 Tirion MM. Large amplitude elastic motions in proteins from a single-parameter, atomic analysis. Phys Rev Lett 1996; 77: 1905–1908.
- 72 Rader AJ,Chennubhotla C,Yang L-W,Bahar I. The Gaussian Network Model: theory and applications. In: Q Cui, I Bahar, editors. Normal mode analysis theory and applications to biological and chemical systems, Chapman and Hall/CRC Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton; 2006. pp 41–64.
- 73 Yang LW,Eyal E,Chennubhotla C,Jee J,Gronenborn AM,Bahar I. Insights into equilibrium dynamics of proteins from comparison of NMR and X-ray data with computational predictions. Structure 2007; 15: 741–749.
- 74 Tsodikov OV,Record MT,Jr,Sergeev YV. Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature. J Comput Chem 2002; 23: 600–609.
- 75 Miyazawa S,Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996; 256: 623–644.
- 76 Thomas PD,Dill KA. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 11628–11633.
- 77 Stiffler MA,Chen JR,Grantcharova VP,Lei Y,Fuchs D,Allen JE,Zaslavskaia LA,MacBeath G. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 2007; 317: 364–369.
- 78 Fujii N,Shelat A,Hall RA,Guy RK. Design of a selective chemical probe for class I PDZ domains. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007; 17: 546–548.
- 79 Grootjans JJ,Zimmermann P,Reekmans G,Smets A,Degeest G,Durr J,David G. Syntenin, a PDZ protein that binds syndecan cytoplasmic domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 13683–13688.
- 80 Hinsen K. Structural flexibility in proteins: impact of the crystal environment. Bioinformatics 2008; 24: 521–528.
- 81 Riccardi D,Cui Q,Phillips GN,Jr. Application of elastic network models to proteins in the crystalline state. Biophys J 2009; 96: 464–475.
- 82 Soheilifard R,Makarov DE,Rodin GJ. Critical evaluation of simple network models of protein dynamics and their comparison with crystallographic B-factors. Phys Biol 2008; 5: 26008.
- 83 Song G,Jernigan RL. vGNM: a better model for understanding the dynamics of proteins in crystals. J Mol Biol 2007; 369: 880–893.
- 84 Isin B,Schulten K,Tajkhorshid E,Bahar I. Mechanism of signal propagation upon retinal isomerization: insights from molecular dynamics simulations of rhodopsin restrained by normal modes. Biophys J 2008; 95: 789–803.
- 85 Maguid S,Fernandez-Alberti S,Ferrelli L,Echave J. Exploring the common dynamics of homologous proteins. Application to the globin family. Biophys J 2005; 89: 3–13.
- 86 Leo-Macias A,Lopez-Romero P,Lupyan D,Zerbino D,Ortiz AR. An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies. Biophys J 2005; 88: 1291–1299.
- 87 Chen SC,Bahar I. Mining frequent patterns in protein structures: a study of protease families. Bioinformatics 2004; 20( Suppl 1): i77–i85.
- 88 Yang LW,Bahar I. Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. Structure 2005; 13: 893–904.
- 89 ClustalW, WWW Service at the European Bioinformatics (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2).
- 90 Thompson JD,Higgins DG,Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 4673–4680.
- 91
Bahar I,Atilgan AR,Jernigan RL,Erman B.
Understanding the recognition of protein structural classes by amino acid composition.
Proteins
1997;
29:
172–185.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199710)29:2<172::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 92 Keskin O,Bahar I,Jernigan RL,Beutler JA,Shoemaker RH,Sausville EA,Covell DG. Characterization of anticancer agents by their growth inhibitory activity and relationships to mechanism of action and structure. Anticancer Drug Des 2000; 15: 79–98.
- 93 Guex N,Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997; 18: 2714–2723.
- 94 Case DA,Cheatham TE,III,Darden T,Gohlke H,Luo R,Merz KM,Jr,Onufriev A,Simmerling C,Wang B,Woods RJ. The amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1668–1688.
- 95
Kollman PA,Dixon R,Cornell W,Vox T,Chipot C,Pohorille A.
The development/application of a “Minimalist” organic/biochemical molecular mechanical force field using a combination of ab initio calculations and experimental data. In:
WF van Gunsteren, PK Weiner, AJ Wilkinson, editors.
Computer simulation of biomolecular systems theoretical and experimental applications.
Boston:
Kluwer;
1997. pp
83–96.
10.1007/978-94-017-1120-3_2 Google Scholar
- 96 Schultz J,Milpetz F,Bork P,Ponting CP. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 5857–5864.
- 97 Bujnicki JM,Elofsson A,Fischer D,Ryclewski L. Structure prediction meta server. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 750–751.
- 98 Ginalski K,Elofsson A,Fischer D,Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1015–1018.
- 99 Lambert C,Leonard N,De Bolle X,Depiereux E. ESyPred3D: prediction of proteins 3D structures. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 1250–1256.
- 100 Sali A,Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993; 234: 779–815.
- 101 Shen MY,Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 2507–2524.
- 102 Yang L,Song G,Jernigan RL. How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models? Biophys J 2007; 93: 920–929.
- 103 Gianni S,Walma T,Arcovito A,Calosci N,Bellelli A,Engstrom A,Travaglini-Allocatelli C,Brunori M,Jemth P,Vuister GW. Demonstration of long-range interactions in a PDZ domain by NMR, kinetics, and protein engineering. Structure 2006; 14: 1801–1809.
- 104 Grootjans JJ,Reekmans G,Ceulemans H,David G. Syntenin-syndecan binding requires syndecan-synteny and the co-operation of both PDZ domains of syntenin. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 19933–19941.
- 105 Harris BZ,Lau FW,Fujii N,Guy RK,Lim WA. Role of electrostatic interactions in PDZ domain ligand recognition. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 2797–2805.
- 106 Imamura F,Maeda S,Doi T,Fujiyoshi Y. Ligand binding of the second PDZ domain regulates clustering of PSD-95 with the Kv1.4 potassium channel. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 3640–3646.
- 107 Madsen KL,Beuming T,Niv MY,Chang CW,Dev KK,Weinstein H,Gether U. Molecular determinants for the complex binding specificity of the PDZ domain in PICK1. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 20539–20548.
- 108 Nonaka M,Doi T,Fujiyoshi Y,Takemoto-Kimura S,Bito H. Essential contribution of the ligand-binding beta B/beta C loop of PDZ1 and PDZ2 in the regulation of postsynaptic clustering, scaffolding, and localization of postsynaptic density-95. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 763–774.
- 109 Staudinger J,Lu J,Olson EN. Specific interaction of the PDZ domain protein PICK1 with the COOH terminus of protein kinase C-alpha. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 32019–32024.
- 110 Wang L,Piserchio A,Mierke DF. Structural characterization of the intermolecular interactions of synapse-associated protein-97 with the NR2B subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 26992–26996.
- 111 Jaulin-Bastard F,Saito H,Le Bivic A,Ollendorff V,Marchetto S,Birnbaum D,Borg JP. The ERBB2/HER2 receptor differentially interacts with ERBIN and PICK1 PSD-95/DLG/ZO-1 domain proteins. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 15256–15263.
- 112 Dev KK,Nakanishi S,Henley JM. The PDZ domain of PICK1 differentially accepts protein kinase C-alpha and GluR2 as interacting ligands. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 41393–41397.
- 113 Dev KK. Making protein interactions druggable: targeting PDZ domains. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004; 3: 1047–1056.