Evaluation of geomorphological classification uncertainty using rough set theory: A case study of Shaanxi Province, China
Jilong Li
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorShan He
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorHan Wu
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jiaming Na
College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence
Jiaming Na, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHu Ding
School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorJilong Li
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorShan He
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorHan Wu
School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jiaming Na
College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence
Jiaming Na, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHu Ding
School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Geomorphological classification is affected by classification principles, indicators, methods, and data resolution, which can lead to uncertainty in the results. Such uncertainty directly affects the quality and subsequent applications of geomorphological classification. To quantify and control the uncertainty, it is important to select an appropriate and effective method for evaluating the uncertainty of geomorphological classification. This study evaluated the uncertainty of geomorphological classification of Shaanxi Province at the ground-feature class and image scales, which derived from rough set theory: rough entropy, approximate classification quality, and approximate classification accuracy. The three indicators helped effectively assess the uncertainty of geomorphological classification at multi-scale and measured the degree to which different factors affected the uncertainty of geomorphological classification. The relative impacts of three factors on the uncertainty of classification decreased in the order of classification methods, data resolution, and classification indicators. This finding is helpful to objectively evaluate and control the uncertainty generated in the process and results of geomorphological classification, and can provide targeted reference and guidance for future geomorphological classification work, which is more conducive to decision-making and application. At the same time, this study is also a beneficial supplement to the geomorphological research based on digital terrain analysis.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Research data are not shared.
REFERENCES
- Alem, A. & Kumar, S. (2022) Deep learning models performance evaluations for remote sensed image classification. IEEE Access, 10, 111784–111793. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3215264
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3215264 Google Scholar
- Arrell, K. & Carver, S. (2009) Surface roughness scaling trends. In: R. Purves, S. Gruber, R. Straumann & T. Hengl (Eds.) Proceedings of Geomorphometry 2009, Geomorphometry 2009, 31 August - 2 September, 2009. Zurich, Switzerland: Departmentof Geography, University of Zurich, pp. 120–123.
- Barman, B. & Patra, S. (2020) Variable precision rough set based unsupervised band selection technique for hyperspectral image classification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 193, 105414. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105414
- Bo, Y. & Wang, J. (2005) Assessment on uncertainty in remotely sensed data classification: progresses, problems and prospects. Advances in Earth Science, 20(11), 1218. (in Chinese).
- Brown, D.G., Lusch, D.P. & Duda, K.A. (1998) Supervised classification of types of glaciated landscapes using digital elevation data. Geomorphology, 21(3–4), 233–250. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00063-9
- Burrough, P.A. & McDonnell, R. (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chambers, J.C., Bradley, B.A., Brown, C.S., D'Antonio, C., Germino, M.J., Grace, J.B., et al. (2014) Resilience to stress and disturbance, and resistance to Bromus tectorum L. invasion in cold desert shrublands of western North America. Ecosystems, 17(2), 360–375. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9725-5
- Cheng, W., Xi, H., Sindikubwabo, C., Si, J., Zhao, C., Yu, T., et al. (2020) Ecosystem health assessment of desert nature reserve with entropy weight and fuzzy mathematics methods: a case study of Badain Jaran Desert. Ecological Indicators, 119, 106843. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106843
- Cheng, W., Zhou, C., Chai, H., Zhao, S., Liu, H. & Zhou, Z. (2011) Research and compilation of the geomorphologic atlas of the People's Republic of China (1: 1,000,000). Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(1), 89–100. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-011-0831-z
- Chien, C.F. & Wu, H.J. (2024) Integrated circuit probe card troubleshooting based on rough set theory for advanced quality control and an empirical study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 35(1), 275–287. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02042-8
10.1007/s10845-022-02042-8 Google Scholar
- Csatáriné Szabó, Z., Mikita, T., Négyesi, G., Varga, O.G., Burai, P., Takács-Szilágyi, L., et al. (2020) Uncertainty and overfitting in fluvial landform classification using laser scanned data and machine learning: a comparison of pixel and object-based approaches. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3652. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213652
- Derbyshire, J. (2020) Answers to questions on uncertainty in geography: old lessons and new scenario tools. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 52(4), 710–727. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19877885
- Ding, H. (2015) Research on Automated Morphological Landform Types Classification Methods Based on the 1:1,000,000 DEM. Thesis, Nanjing, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, viewed 1 June 2015, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database.
- Ding, H., Tao, F., Zhao, W., Na, J. & Tang, G. (2016) An object-based method for Chinese geomorphological types classification. ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, 213–217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B7-213-2016
10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B7-213-2016 Google Scholar
- Drăguţ, L., & Blaschke, T. (2006) Automated classification of geomorphological elements using object-based image analysis. Geomorphology, 81(3–4), 330–344. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013
- Editorial Committee of Geomorphologic Atlas of People's Republic of China. (2009) The geomorphologic atlas of People's Republic of China (1:1,000,000). Beijing: Science Press.
- Eltner, A., Baumgart, P., Maas, H.G. & Faust, D. (2015) Multi-temporal UAV data for automatic measurement of rill and interrill erosion on loess soil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40(6), 741–755. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3673
- Evans, D.A., Williard, K.W. & Schoonover, J.E. (2016) Comparison of terrain indices and landform classification procedures in low-relief agricultural fields. Journal of Geospatial Applications in Natural Resources, 1(1), 1.
- Feng, G., Ming, D., Wang, M. & Yang, J. (2017) Connotations of pixel-based scale effect in remote sensing and the modified fractal-based analysis method. Computers & Geosciences, 103, 183–190. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.03.014
- Foody, G.M. (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185–201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4
- Foody, G.M. (2020) Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, 111630. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111630
- Gupta, R., Sharma, K. & Garg, R.K. (2024) Innovative approach to android malware detection: prioritizing critical features using rough set theory. Electronics, 13(3), 482. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13030482
10.3390/electronics13030482 Google Scholar
- Huang, D., Xu, S., Sun, J., Liang, S., Song, W. & Wang, Z. (2017) Accuracy assessment model for classification result of remote sensing image based on spatial sampling. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11(4), 046023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.046023
10.1117/1.JRS.11.046023 Google Scholar
- Irfan, M., Bali, B.S. & Afzal, A. (2024) Late Quaternary tectono-geomorphological investigations of Zanskar Basin, NW Himalaya, India, using geospatial techniques. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(2), 684–705. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5730
- Jactel, H., Bauhus, J., Boberg, J., Bonal, D., Castagneyrol, B., Gardiner, B., et al. (2017) Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Current Forestry Reports, 3(3), 223–243. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0064-1
- Jing, X., Liu, Z., Yang, M. & Bao, Y. (2015) Uncertainty research of remote sensing image classification using the modified rough entropy model. In: A. Hussain & M. Ivanovic (Eds.) Electronics, communications and networks IV: proceedings of the 4th international conference on electronics, communications and networks (CECNET IV), 12–15 December 2014. Beijing, China, London: CRC Press, pp. 149–154 https://doi.org/10.1201/b18592-30
10.1201/b18592-30 Google Scholar
- Karagulle, D., Frye, C., Sayre, R., Breyer, S., Aniello, P., Vaughan, R., et al. (2017) Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250-m elevation data. Transactions in GIS, 21(5), 1040–1060. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12265
- Kong, C., Li, Y., Dong, K., Tian, Y. & Xu, K. (2023) Landslide susceptibility assessment in Qinzhou based on rough set and semi-supervised support vector machine. Earth Science Informatics, 16(4), 3163–3177. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01087-4
- Korzeniowska, K., Pfeifer, N. & Landtwing, S. (2018) Mapping gullies, dunes, lava fields, and landslides via surface roughness. Geomorphology, 301, 53–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.011
- Kurgan, L.A. & Cios, K.J. (2004) CAIM discretization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(2), 145–153. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2004.1269594
10.1109/TKDE.2004.1269594 Google Scholar
- Lepistö, L., Kunttu, I. & Visa, A. (2006) Classification of natural rock images using classifier combinations. Optical Engineering, 45(9), 097201. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2354086
10.1117/1.2354086 Google Scholar
- Li, J. (2020) Research on Uncertainty of Geomorphic Classification Based on Digital Elevation Models—A Case Study of Shaanxi Province. Thesis, Nanjing, Nanjing Normal University, viewed 13 March 2020, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database.
- Li, S., Ge, Y., Li, D. & Wang, J. (2006) Measurement of the uncertainty in remote sensing information. Journal of Shanxi University (Nat. Sci. Ed.), 29(1), 30–32. (in Chinese).
- Li, M., Li, L., Lai, Y., He, L., He, Z. & Wang, Z. (2023) Geological Hazard susceptibility analysis based on RF, SVM, and NB models, using the Puge section of the Zemu River valley as an example. Sustainability, 15(14), 11228. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411228
10.3390/su151411228 Google Scholar
- Li, B., Pan, B. & Han, J. (2008) Basic terrestrial geomorphological types in China and their circumscriptions. Quaternary Sciences, 28(4), 535–543. (in Chinese).
- Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S. & Wu, C. (2014) A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: the role of spatio-contextual information. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 47(1), 389–411. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20144723
- Lin, S., Chen, N. & He, Z. (2021) Automatic geomorphological recognition from the perspective of watershed spatial structure based on digital elevation models. Remote Sensing, 13(19), 3926. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193926
- Liu, A. & Wang, Y. (2011) Object-oriented method based research on classification of relief form of China. In: International conference on information science and technology, 26-28 march 2011, Nanjing, China. New York, USA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), pp. 679–684. Available from https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765338
- Louargant, M., Jones, G., Faroux, R., Paoli, J.N., Maillot, T., Gée, C., et al. (2018) Unsupervised classification algorithm for early weed detection in row-crops by combining spatial and spectral information. Remote Sensing, 10(5), 761. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050761
- Luoto, M., Marmion, M. & Hjort, J. (2010) Assessing spatial uncertainty in predictive geomorphological mapping: a multi-modelling approach. Computers & Geosciences, 36(3), 355–361. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.008
- Lyu, Y., Gao, F., Wu, I.S. & Lim, B.Y. (2020) Imma sort by two or more attributes with interpretable monotonic multi-attribute sorting. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(4), 2369–2384. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3043487
10.1109/TVCG.2020.3043487 Google Scholar
- Ma, L., Li, M., Blaschke, T., Ma, X., Tiede, D., Cheng, L., et al. (2016) Object-based change detection in urban areas: the effects of segmentation strategy, scale, and feature space on unsupervised methods. Remote Sensing, 8(9), 761. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090761
- MacMillan, R.A. & Shary, P.A. (2009) Landforms and landform elements in geomorphometry. Developments in Soil Science, 33, 227–254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00009-3
10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00009-3 Google Scholar
- Marichal, J.L., Meyer, P. & Roubens, M. (2005) Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: the TOMASO method. Computers & Operations Research, 32(4), 861–877. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2003.09.002
- Mashimbye, Z.E. & Loggenberg, K. (2023) A scoping review of landform classification using geospatial methods. Geomatics, 3(1), 93–114. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics3010005
10.3390/geomatics3010005 Google Scholar
- Mokarram, M. & Hojati, M. (2016) Comparison of landform classifications of elevation, slope, relief and curvature with topographic position index in the south of Bojnoord. Ecopersia, 4(2), 1343–1357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18869/modares.ecopersia.4.2.1343
10.18869/modares.ecopersia.4.2.1343 Google Scholar
- Mu, C., Dong, Z. & Liu, Y. (2022) A two-branch convolutional neural network based on multi-spectral entropy rate superpixel segmentation for hyperspectral image classification. Remote Sensing, 14(7), 1569. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071569
- Na, J., Ding, H., Zhao, W., Liu, K., Tang, G. & Pfeifer, N. (2021) Object-based large-scale terrain classification combined with segmentation optimization and terrain features: a case study in China. Transactions in GIS, 25(6), 2939–2962. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12795
- National Center for Basic Geographic Information of China. (2019) National Basic Geographic Information Database. Available at: https://www.ngcc.cn/ [Accessed 30 June 2019].
- Paul, A. & Bhattacharji, M. (2023) Prediction of landuse/landcover using CA-ANN approach and its association with river-bank erosion on a stretch of Bhagirathi River of lower ganga plain. GeoJournal, 88(3), 3323–3346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10814-1
10.1007/s10708-022-10814-1 Google Scholar
- Pawlak, Z. (1982) Rough sets. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, 11(5), 341–356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01001956
10.1007/BF01001956 Google Scholar
- Pawlak, Z. & Sowinski, R. (1994) Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 72(3), 443–459. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90415-4
- Qahtan, S., Alsattar, H.A., Zaidan, A.A., Deveci, M., Pamucar, D. & Delen, D. (2023) Performance assessment of sustainable transportation in the shipping industry using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough sets-based decision making methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 223, 119958. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119958
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119958 Google Scholar
- Sarkar, S., Pramanik, A. & Maiti, J. (2023) An integrated approach using rough set theory, ANFIS, and Z-number in occupational risk prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, 105515. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105515
10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105515 Google Scholar
- Sewwandi, M.A.N.D., Li, Y. & Zhang, J. (2023) A class-specific feature selection and classification approach using neighborhood rough set and K-nearest neighbor theories. Applied Soft Computing, 143, 110366. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110366
10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110366 Google Scholar
- Shi, W. (2005) Principles of modeling uncertainties in spatial data and spatial analyses. Beijing: Science Press.
- Shi, W., & Liu, K. (2004) Modeling fuzzy topological relations between uncertain objects in a GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(8), 921–929. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.8.921
10.14358/PERS.70.8.921 Google Scholar
- Sun, L., Wang, L., Ding, W., Qian, Y. & Xu, J. (2020) Feature selection using fuzzy neighborhood entropy-based uncertainty measures for fuzzy neighborhood multigranulation rough sets. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29(1), 19–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.2989098
- Tang, G., Li, F. & Liu, X. (2010) Tutorial of digital elevation model. Beijing: Science Press.
- Tang, G., Li, F., Liu, X., Long, Y. & Yang, X. (2008) Research on the slope spectrum of the loess plateau. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 51(Suppl 1), 175–185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-008-5002-9
10.1007/s11431-008-5002-9 Google Scholar
- Tang, G., Li, J., Xiong, L. & Na, J. (2022) Scientific attributes and expression methods of geographical boundary. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(6), 1119–1135. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1988-3
- Tenerelli, P. & Carver, S. (2012) Multi-criteria, multi-objective and uncertainty analysis for agro-energy spatial modelling. Applied Geography, 32(2), 724–736. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.013
10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.013 Google Scholar
- Turner, M.G. (1987) Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 29–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275263
- Ventura, S.J. & Irvin, B.J. (2000) Automated geomorphological classification methods for soil-landscape studies. In: J.P. Wilson & J.C. Gallant (Eds.) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 267–294.
- Wang, C., Huang, Y., Shao, M. & Chen, D. (2019) Uncertainty measures for general fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 360, 82–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2018.07.00
10.1016/j.fss.2018.07.006 Google Scholar
- Wei, M. (2013) Multi-scale assessment for uncertainty of classification of remote sensing image based on information theory and rough set. Thesis. Xi'an, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, viewed 30 June 2013, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database.
- Wei, H., Li, S., Li, C., Zhao, F., Xiong, L. & Tang, G. (2021) Quantification of loess geomorphologicals from three-dimensional landscape pattern perspective by using DEMs. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(10), 693. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10100693
- Wu, S., Liu, J. & Yang, P. (2013) Evaluation on uncertainty in agricultural remote sensing classification based on exponential hybrid entropy model in parametric form. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(6), 177–184. (in Chinese).
- Xiong, L., Tang, G., Yang, X. & Li, F. (2021) Geomorphology-oriented digital terrain analysis: Progress and perspectives. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(3), 456–476. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1853-9
- Xu, L., Wang, Y., Mo, L., Tang, Y., Wang, F. & Li, C. (2023) The research progress and prospect of data mining methods on corrosion prediction of oil and gas pipelines. Engineering Failure Analysis, 144, 106951. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106951
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106951 Google Scholar
- Yi, L. (2011) Uncertainty analysis in Object-oriented Remote Sensing Image Classification. Thesis, Wuhan, Wuhan University, viewed 1 April 2011, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database
- Zeng, D. (2015) Classification of Relief Form Based on the Best Terrain Factor Combination. Thesis, Chongqing, Chongqing Jiaotong University, viewed 20 April 2015, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database
- Zhang, J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2002) Uncertainty in geographical information. London: CRC Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1201/b12624
10.4324/9780203471326 Google Scholar
- Zhang, P., Li, T., Wang, G., Luo, C., Chen, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) Multi-source information fusion based on rough set theory: a review. Information Fusion, 68, 85–117. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.11.004
- Ziarko, W. (1993) Variable precision rough set model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 46(1), 39–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(93)90048-2