Volume 49, Issue 13 pp. 4532-4548
CASE STUDY

Evaluation of geomorphological classification uncertainty using rough set theory: A case study of Shaanxi Province, China

Jilong Li

Jilong Li

School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Shan He

Shan He

School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Han Wu

Han Wu

School of Geography and Planning, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jiaming Na

Corresponding Author

Jiaming Na

College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

Correspondence

Jiaming Na, College of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Hu Ding

Hu Ding

School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 September 2024
Citations: 1

Abstract

Geomorphological classification is affected by classification principles, indicators, methods, and data resolution, which can lead to uncertainty in the results. Such uncertainty directly affects the quality and subsequent applications of geomorphological classification. To quantify and control the uncertainty, it is important to select an appropriate and effective method for evaluating the uncertainty of geomorphological classification. This study evaluated the uncertainty of geomorphological classification of Shaanxi Province at the ground-feature class and image scales, which derived from rough set theory: rough entropy, approximate classification quality, and approximate classification accuracy. The three indicators helped effectively assess the uncertainty of geomorphological classification at multi-scale and measured the degree to which different factors affected the uncertainty of geomorphological classification. The relative impacts of three factors on the uncertainty of classification decreased in the order of classification methods, data resolution, and classification indicators. This finding is helpful to objectively evaluate and control the uncertainty generated in the process and results of geomorphological classification, and can provide targeted reference and guidance for future geomorphological classification work, which is more conducive to decision-making and application. At the same time, this study is also a beneficial supplement to the geomorphological research based on digital terrain analysis.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Research data are not shared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.