Volume 31, Issue 5 pp. 372-378
REVIEW ARTICLE

Current state of whole slide imaging use in cytopathology: Pros and pitfalls

Albino Eccher

Corresponding Author

Albino Eccher

Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy

Correspondence

Albino Eccher, Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1; 37126, Verona, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ilaria Girolami

Ilaria Girolami

Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 February 2020
Citations: 47

Abstract

Whole slide imaging (WSI) allows generation of large whole slide images and their navigation with zoom in and out like a true virtual microscope. It has become widely used in surgical pathology for many purposes, such as education and training, research activity, teleconsultation, and primary diagnosis. However, in cytopathology, the use of WSI has been lagging behind histology, mainly due to the cytological specimen's characteristics, as groups of cells of different thickness are distributed throughout the slide. To allow the same focusing capability of light microscope, slides have to be scanned at multiple focal planes, at the cost of longer scan times and larger file size. These are the main technical pitfalls of WSI for cytopathology, partly overcome by solutions like liquid-based preparations. Validation studies for the use in primary diagnosis are less numerous and more heterogeneous than in surgical pathology. WSI has been proved effective for training students and successfully used in proficiency testing, allowing the creation of digital cytology atlases. Longer scan times are also a barrier for use in rapid on-site evaluation, but WSI retains its advantages of easy sharing of images for consultation, multiple simultaneous viewing in different locations, the possibility of unlimited annotations and easy integration with medical records. Moreover, digital slides set the laboratory free from reliance on a physical glass slide, with no more concern of fading of stain or slide breakage. Costs are still a problem for small institutions, but WSI can also represent the beginning of a more efficient way of working.

Abstract

This review summarizes the advantages and the disadvantages of the use of whole slide imaging (WSI) in cytopathology, starting from the cytological specimen to the entire laboratory and istitution. Whole Slide Imaging provides high-quality standardized slides, but there is still a need for validation studies before full adoption for primary diagnosis. Whole Slide Imaging in cytology retains most of the advantages of surgical pathology, and in the near future barriers to adoption will be overcome.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.