Functional evolution of PLP-dependent enzymes based on active-site structural similarities
Jonathan Catazaro
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0304
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Caprez
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorAshu Guru
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorDavid Swanson
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Robert Powers
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0304
Correspondence to: Robert Powers, Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 722 Hamilton Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorJonathan Catazaro
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0304
Search for more papers by this authorAdam Caprez
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorAshu Guru
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorDavid Swanson
Holland Computing Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0150
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Robert Powers
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68588-0304
Correspondence to: Robert Powers, Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 722 Hamilton Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Families of distantly related proteins typically have very low sequence identity, which hinders evolutionary analysis and functional annotation. Slowly evolving features of proteins, such as an active site, are therefore valuable for annotating putative and distantly related proteins. To date, a complete evolutionary analysis of the functional relationship of an entire enzyme family based on active-site structural similarities has not yet been undertaken. Pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP) dependent enzymes are primordial enzymes that diversified in the last universal ancestor. Using the comparison of protein active site structures (CPASS) software and database, we show that the active site structures of PLP-dependent enzymes can be used to infer evolutionary relationships based on functional similarity. The enzymes successfully clustered together based on substrate specificity, function, and three-dimensional-fold. This study demonstrates the value of using active site structures for functional evolutionary analysis and the effectiveness of CPASS. Proteins 2014; 82:2597–2608. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
prot24624-sup-0001-suppinfo1.xlsx18.6 KB |
Supplementary Information |
prot24624-sup-0002-suppinfo2.pdf535.5 KB |
Supplementary Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001; 307: 1113–1143.
- 2 Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Evolving genes proteins. Symp Rutgers, State Univ; New York: Academic Press; 1965. pp 97–166.
- 3 Morozova O, Marra MA. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 2008; 92: 255–264.
- 4 Burley SK, Almo SC, Bonanno JB, Capel M, Chance MR, Gaasterland T, Lin D, Sali A, Studier FW, Swaminathan S. Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nat Genet 1999; 23: 151–157.
- 5 Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2006; 7: 337–348.
- 6 Chothia C, Gough J. Genomic and structural aspects of protein evolution. Biochem J 2009; 419: 15–28.
- 7 Martincorena I, Seshasayee ASN, Luscombe NM. Evidence of non-random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy. Nature 2012; 485: 95–98.
- 8 Eliot AC, Kirsch JF. Pyridoxal phosphate enzymes: mechanistic, structural, and evolutionary considerations. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73: 383–415.
- 9 Hasson MS, Schlichting I, Moulai J, Taylor K, Barrett W, Kenyon GL, Babbitt PC, Gerlt JA, Petsko GA, Ringe D. Evolution of an enzyme active site: the structure of a new crystal form of muconate lactonizing enzyme compared with mandelate racemase and enolase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 10396–10401.
- 10 La D, Sutch B, Livesay DR. Predicting protein functional sites with phylogenetic motifs. Proteins 2005; 58: 309–320.
- 11 Georgi B, Schultz J, Schliep A. Partially-supervised protein subclass discovery with simultaneous annotation of functional residues. BMC Struct Biol 2009; 9: 68.
- 12 Gutteridge A, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM. Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes. J Mol Biol 2003; 330: 719–734.
- 13 Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJE. Supersites withing superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol 1998; 282: 903–918.
- 14 Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. J Mol Biol 2002; 323: 387–406.
- 15 Powers R, Copeland JC, Germer K, Mercier KA, Ramanathan V, Revesz P. Comparison of protein active site structures for functional annotation of proteins and drug design. Proteins 2006; 65: 124–135.
- 16 Fetrow JS, Godzik A, Skolnick J. Functional analysis of the Escherichia coli genome using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm: identification of proteins exhibiting the glutaredoxin/thioredoxin disulfide oxidoreductase activity. J Mol Biol 1998; 282: 703–711.
- 17 Kolker E, Picone AF, Galperin MY, Romine MF, Higdon R, Makarova KS, Kolker N, Anderson GA, Qiu X, Auberry KJ, Babnigg G, Beliaev AS, Edlefsen P, Elias DA, Gorby YA, Holzman T, Klappenbach JA, Konstantinidis KT, Land ML, Lipton MS, McCue LA, Monroe M, Pasa-Tolic L, Pinchuk G, Purvine S, Serres MH, Tsapin S, Zakrajsek BA, Zhu W, Zhou J, Larimer FW, Lawrence CE, Riley M, Collart FR, Yates JR, Smith RD, Giometti CS, Nealson KH, Fredrickson JK, Tiedje JM. Global profiling of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1: expression of hypothetical genes and improved functional annotations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2099–2104.
- 18 Hemrika W, Renirie R, Dekker HL, Barnett P, Wever R. From phosphatases to vanadium peroxidases: a similar architecture of the active site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2145–2149.
- 19 Kull FJ, Vale RD, Fletterick RJ. The case for a common ancestor: kinesin and myosin motor proteins and G proteins. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1998; 19: 877–886.
- 20 Kaessmann H. Origins, evolution, and phenotypic impact of new genes. Genome Res 2010; 20: 1313–1326.
- 21 Hughes AL. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc Biol Sci 1994; 256: 119–124.
- 22 Prince VE, Pickett FB. Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3: 827–837.
- 23 Jones S, Thornton JM. Searching for functional sites in protein structures. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2004; 8: 3–7.
- 24 Christen P, Mehta PK. From cofactor to enzymes. The molecular evolution of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enyzmes. Chem Rec 2001; 1: 436–447.
- 25 Bairoch A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 304–305.
- 26 Jansonius JN. Structure, evolution and action of vitamin B6-dependent enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1998; 8: 759–769.
- 27 Dunathan HC. Conformation and reaction specificity in pyridoxal phosphate enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1966; 55: 712–716.
- 28 Hayashi H. Pyridoxal enzymes: mechanistic diversity and uniformity. J Biochem 1995; 118: 463–473.
- 29 Christen P, Kasper P, Gehring H, Sterk M. Stereochemical constraint in the evolution of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enzymes. A hypothesis. FEBS Lett 1996; 389: 12–14.
- 30 Schneider G, Kack H, Lindqvist Y. The manifold of vitamin B6 dependent enzymes. Structure 2000; 8: 1–6.
- 31 Alexander FW, Sandmeier E, Mehta PK, Christen P. Evolutionary relationships among pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enzymes. Regio-specific α, β and γ families. Eur J Biochem 1994; 219: 953–960.
- 32 Mehta PK, Christen P. The molecular evolution of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-dependent enzymes. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 2000; 74: 129–184.
- 33 Powers R, Copeland JC, Stark JL, Caprez A, Guru A, Swanson D. Searching the protein structure database for ligand-binding site similarities using CPASS v.2. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4: 17.
- 34 Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235–242.
- 35 Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrixes from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 10915–10919.
- 36 Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrixes. Proteins 1993; 17: 49–61.
- 37 The UniProt Consortium. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(Database): D193–D197.
- 38 Huson DH. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 2005; 23: 254–267.
- 39 Bryant D. Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol Biol Evol 2003; 21: 255–265.
- 40 Huson DH, Scornavacca C. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst Biol 2012; 61: 1061–1067.
- 41 Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Söding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 2011; 7: 539.
- 42 Zhang Y. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 2302–2309.
- 43 Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1605–1612.
- 44 Jensen RA, Gu W. Evolutionary recruitment of biochemically specialized subdivisions of family I within the protein superfamily of aminotransferases. J Bacteriol 1996; 178: 2161–2171.
- 45 Grishin NV, Phillips MA, Goldsmith EJ. Modeling of the spatial structure of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylases. Prot Sci 1995; 4: 1291–1304.
- 46 Rausch C, Lerchner A, Schiefner A, Skerra A. Crystal structure of the ω-aminotransferase from Paracoccus denitrificans and its phylogenetic relationship with other class III aminotransferases that have biotechnological potential. Proteins 2013; 81: 774–787.
- 47 Liu L, Iwata K, Yohda M, Miki K. Structural insight into gene duplication, gene fusion and domain swapping in the evolution of PLP-independent amino acid racemases. FEBS Lett 2002; 528: 114–118.
- 48 Kidron H, Repo S, Johnson MS, Salminen TA. Functional classification of amino acid decarboxylases from the alanine racemase structural family by phylogenetic studies. Mol Biol Evol 2006; 24: 79–89.
- 49 Shah R, Coleman CS, Mir K, Baldwin J, Van Etten JL, Grishin NV, Pegg AE, Stanley BA, Phillips MA. Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 encodes an unusual arginine decarboxylase that is a close homolog of eukaryotic ornithine decarboxylases. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 35760–35767.
- 50 Sugio S, Petsko GA, Manning JM, Soda K, Ringe D. Crystal structure of a D-amino acid aminotransferase: how the protein controls stereoselectivity. Biochemistry 1995; 34: 9661–9669.
- 51 Rost B. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 2002; 318: 595–608.
- 52 Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25: 3389–3402.
- 53 Karplus K, Barrett W, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998; 14: 846–856.
- 54 Doolittle RF. Of URFs and ORFs: a primer on how to analyze derived amino acid sequences. Mill Valley (CA): University Science Books; 1986.
- 55 Pei J, Kim BH, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 2295–2300.
- 56 Armougom F, Moretti S, Poirot O, Audic S, Dumas P, Schaeli B, Keduas V, Notredame C. Expresso: automatic incorporation of structural information in multiple sequence alignments using 3D-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34(Web Server): W604–W608.
- 57 Percudani R, Peracchi A. A genomic overview of pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent enzymes. EMBO Rep 2003; 4: 850–854.
- 58 Percudani R, Peracchi A. The B6 database: a tool for the description and classification of vitamin B6-dependent enzymatic activities and of the corresponding protein families. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10: 273.
- 59 Rajaram V, Ratna Prasuna P, Savithri HS, Murthy MRN. Structure of biosynthetic N-acetylornithine aminotransferase from Salmonella typhimurium: studies on substrate specificity and inhibitor binding. Proteins 2007; 70: 429–441.
- 60 Kack H, Sandmark J, Gibson K, Schneider G, Lindqvist Y. Crystal structure of diaminopelargonic acid synthase: evolutionary relationships between pyridoxal-5'-phosphatedependent enzymes. J Mol Biol 1999; 291: 857–876.
- 61 Goldberg JM, Swanson RV, Goodman HS, Kirsch JF. The tyrosine-225 to phenylalanine mutation of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase results in an alkaline transition in the spectrophotometric and kinetic pKa values and reduced values of both kcat and Km. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 305–312.
- 62 Kamitori S, Okamoto A, Hirotsu K, Higuchi T, Kuramitsu S, Kagamiyama H, Matsuura Y, Katsube Y. Three-dimensional structures of aspartate aminotransferase from Escherichia coli and its mutant enzyme at 2.5A resolution. J Biochem 1990; 108: 175–184.
- 63 Liu W, Peterson PE, Carter RJ, Zhou X, Langston JA, Fisher AJ, Toney MD. Crystal structures of unbound and aminooxyacetate-bound Escherichia coli γ-aminobutyrate aminotransferase. Biochemistry 2004; 43: 10896–10905.
- 64 Malashkevich VN, Onuffer JJ, Kirsch JF, Jansonius JN. Alternating argninie-modulated substrate specificity in an engineered tyrosine aminotransferase. Nat Struct Biol 1995; 2: 548–553.