Glucose oxidase from Penicillium amagasakiense: Characterization of the transition state of its denaturation from molecular dynamics simulations
Guido Todde
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorSven Hovmöller
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAatto Laaksonen
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy
Stellenbosch Institute of Advanced Studies (STIAS), Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Francesca Mocci
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy
Correspondence to: Francesca Mocci, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorGuido Todde
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorSven Hovmöller
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAatto Laaksonen
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy
Stellenbosch Institute of Advanced Studies (STIAS), Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Francesca Mocci
Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy
Correspondence to: Francesca Mocci, Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Cagliari University, Cagliari, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Glucose oxidase (GOx) is a flavoenzyme having applications in food and medical industries. However, GOx, as many other enzymes when extracted from the cells, has relatively short operational lifetimes. Several recent studies (both experimental and theoretical), carried out on small proteins (or small fractions of large proteins), show that a detailed knowledge of how the breakdown process starts and proceeds on molecular level could be of significant help to artificially improve the stability of fragile proteins. We have performed extended molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to study the denaturation of GOx (a protein dimer containing nearly 1200 amino acids) to identify weak points in its structure and in this way gather information to later make it more stable, for example, by mutations. A denaturation of a protein can be simulated by increasing the temperature far above physiological temperature. We have performed a series of MD simulations at different temperatures (300, 400, 500, and 600 K). The exit from the protein's native state has been successfully identified with the clustering method and supported by other methods used to analyze the simulation data. A common set of amino acids is regularly found to initiate the denaturation, suggesting a moiety where the enzyme could be strengthened by a suitable amino acid based modification. Proteins 2014; 82:2353–2363. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
prot24596-sup-0001-suppinfo01.pdf2.9 MB | Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Heller A. Miniature biofuel cells. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2004; 6: 209–216.
- 2 Wong CM, Wong KH, Chen XD. Glucose oxidase: natural occurrence, function, properties and industrial applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008; 78: 927–938.
- 3 Bankar SB, Bule MV, Singhal RS, Ananthanarayan L. Glucose oxidase—an overview. Biotechnol Adv 2009; 27: 489–501.
- 4 Chen L, Zhang X, Xie W, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Cass A. Genetic modification of glucose oxidase for improving performance of an amperometric blucose biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 2002; 17: 851–857.
- 5 Bhatti HN, Saleem N. Characterization of glucose oxidase from Penicillium notatum. Food Technol Biotechnol 2009; 47: 331–335.
- 6 Bodade RG, Khobragade CN, Arfeen S. Optimization of culture conditions for glucose oxidase production by a Penicillium chrysogenum SRT 19 strain. Eng Life Sci 2010; 10: 35–39.
- 7 Zhu Z, Momeu C, Zakhartsev M, Schwaneberg U. Making glucose oxidase fit for biofuel cell applications by directed protein evolution. Biosens Bioelectro 2006; 21: 2046–2051.
- 8 Prévoteau A, Courjean O, Mano N. Deglycosylation of glucose oxidase to improve biosensors and biofuel cells. Electrochem Commun 2010; 12: 213–215.
- 9 Holland JT, Harper JC, Dolan PL, Manginell MM, Arango DC, Rawlings JA, Apblett CA, Brozik SM. Rational redesign of glucose oxidase for improved catalytic function and stability. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37924.
- 10 Courjean O, Mano N. Recombinant glucose oxidase from Penicillium amagasakiense for efficient bioelectrochemical applications in physiological conditions. J Biotechnol 2011; 151: 122–129.
- 11 Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995; 247: 536–540.
- 12 Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235–242.
- 13 Wohlfahrt G, Witt S, Hendle J, Schomburg D, Kalisz HM, Hecht HJ. 1.8 and 1.9 Å resolution structures of the Penicillium amagasakiense and Aspergillus niger glucose oxidases as a basis for modelling substrate complexes. Acta Crystallogr D 1999; 55: 969–977.
- 14 Eremin AN, Metelitsa DI, Shishko ZF, Mikhailova RV. Thermal stability of glucose oxidase from Penicillium adametzii. Appl Biochem Microbiol 2001; 37: 578–586.
- 15 Caves MS, Derham BK, Jezek J, Freedman RB. The mechanism of inactivation of glucose oxidase from Penicillium amagasakiense under ambient storage conditions. Enzyme Microb Tech 2011; 49: 79–87.
- 16 Zoldák G, Zubrik A, Musatov A, Stupák M, Sedlák E. Irreversible thermal denaturation of glucose oxidase from Aspergillus niger is the transition to the denatured state with residual structure. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 47601–47609.
- 17 Wang Q, Xu W, Wu P, Zhang H, Cai C, Zhao B. New insights into the effects of thermal treatment on the catalytic activity and conformational structure of glucose oxidase studied by electrochemistry, #IR |spectroscopy, and theoretical calculation. J Phys Chem B 2010; 114: 12754–12764.
- 18 Daggett V. Protein folding simulation. Chem Rev (Washington, DC, US) 2006; 106: 1898–1916.
- 19 Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Bank JA, Jumper JM, Salmon JK, Shan Y, Wriggers W. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science (New York, NY) 2010; 330: 341–346.
- 20 Alonso DO, Alm E, Daggett V. Characterization of the unfolding pathway of the cell-cycle protein p13suc1 by molecular dynamics simulations: implications for domain swapping. Structure 2000; 8: 101–110.
- 21 Day R, Bennion BJ, Ham S, Daggett V. Increasing temperature accelerates protein unfolding without changing the pathway of unfolding. J Mol Biol 2002; 322: 189–203.
- 22 Tirado-Rives J, Orozco M, Jorgensen WL. Molecular dynamics simulations of the unfolding of barnase in water and 8 M aqueous urea. Biochemistry 1997; 36: 7313–7329.
- 23 Su JG, Xu XJ, Li CH, Chen WZ, Wang CX. An analysis of the influence of protein intrinsic dynamical properties on its thermal unfolding behavior. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2011; 29: 105–121.
- 24 Katano H, Sugimoto Y, Uematsu KU, Hibi T. Kinetic study of the thermal inactivation of glucose oxidase in the presence of denaturant and stabilizer by means of bioelectrocatalysis method. Analyt Sci 2011; 27: 979–983.
- 25 Sarupria S, Ghosh T, García AE, Garde S. Studying pressure denaturation of a protein by molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2010; 78: 1641–1651.
- 26 Trzesniak D, Lins RD, van Gunsteren WF. Protein under pressure: molecular dynamics simulation of the arc repressor. Proteins 2006; 144: 136-144.
- 27 Paci E. High pressure simulations of biomolecules. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1595: 185–200.
- 28 Chng C-P, Kitao A. Mechanical unfolding of bacterial Flagellar filament protein by molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Graphics Modell 2010; 28: 548–554.
- 29 Hisatomi Y, Katagiri D, Neya S, Hara M, Hoshino T. Analysis of the unfolding process of green fluorescent protein by molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2008; 112: 8672–8680.
- 30 Toofanny RD, Daggett V. Understanding protein unfolding from molecular simulations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Mol Sci 2012; 2: 405–423.
- 31 Beck DAC, Daggett V. Methods for molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding/unfolding in solution. Methods 2004; 34: 112–120.
- 32 Yoda T, Saito M, Arai M, Horii K, Tsumoto K, Matsushima M, Kumagai I, Kuwajima K. Folding-unfolding of goat α-lactalbumin studied by stopped-flow circular dichroism and molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2001; 42: 49–65.
- 33 Pikkemaat MG, Linssen ABM, Berendsen HJC, Janssen DB. Molecular dynamics simulations as a tool for improving protein stability. Protein Eng 2002; 15: 185–192.
- 34 Badieyan S, Bevan DR, Zhang C. Study and design of stability in GH5 cellulases. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012; 109: 31–44.
- 35 Berendsen H, Van der Spoel D, Van Drunen R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 1995; 91: 43–56.
- 36 Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J Comput Chem 2005; 26: 1701–1718.
- 37 Hess B, Kutzner C, Van der Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 2008; 4: 435–447.
- 38 Lindahl E, Hess B. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 2001; 7: 306–317.
- 39 Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 2006; 725: 712–725.
- 40
Schneider C,
Suhnel J. Simulation of the flavin mononucleotide RNA aptamer complex. Biopolymers 1999; 50: 287–302.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199909)50:3<287::AID-BIP5>3.0.CO;2-G CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 41 Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell W, Kollman PA. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem B 1993; 97: 10269–10280.
- 42 Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983; 79: 926–935.
- 43 Hoover WG. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A 1985; 31: 1695–1697.
- 44 Nosé S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol Phys 1984; 52: 255–268.
- 45 Nosé S, Klein ML. Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Mol Phys 1983; 50: 1055–1076.
- 46 Parrinello M, Rahman A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 1981; 52: 7182–7190.
- 47 Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 1993; 98: 10089–10092.
- 48 Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys 1995; 103: 8577–8593.
- 49 Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraajie JGEM. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 1997; 18: 1463–1472.
- 50 Andersson K, Hovmöller S. The average atomic volume and density of proteins. Z Kristallogr 1998; 213: 369–373.
- 51 Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577–2637.
- 52 Joosten, R. P., T. A. H. te Beek, E. Krieger, M. L. Hekkelman, R. W. W. Hooft, R. Schneider, C. Sander, and G. Vriend, 2011. A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: D411–D419.
- 53 Hünenberger, P. H., A. E. Mark, and W. F. van Gunsteren, 1995. Fluctuation and cross-correlation analysis of protein motions observed in nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 252: 492–503.
- 54 Doruker, P., A. R. Atilgan, and I. Bahar, 2000. Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: application to α-amylase inhibitor. Proteins 1983; 524: 512–524.
- 55 Lobanov MY, Bogatyreva NS, Galzitskaya OV. Radius of gyration as an indicator of protein structure compactness. Mol Biol (Mosk) 2008; 42: 623–628.
- 56 Richmond TJ. Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. J Mol Biol 1984; 178: 63–89.
- 57 Goldenberg DP, Creighton TE. Energetics of protein structure and folding. Biopolymers 1985; 24: 167–182.
- 58 Li A, Daggett V. Characterization of the transition state of protein unfolding by Use of molecular dynamics: chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 10430–10434.
- 59 Matouschek A, Kellis JTJ, Serrano L, Fersht AL. Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering. Nature 1989; 340: 122–126.
- 60 Jackson SE, Fersht AR. Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. Influence of proline isomerization on the folding kinetics and thermodynamic characterization of the transition state of folding. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 10436–10443.
- 61 Jackson SE, el Masry N, Fersht AR. Structure of the hydrophobic core in the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2: a critical test of the protein engineering method of analysis. Biochemistry 1993; 32: 11270–11278.
- 62 Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE. Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 97: 2958–2966.
- 63 Kazmirski SL, Li A, Daggett V. Analysis methods for comparison of multiple molecular dynamics trajectories: applications to protein unfolding pathways and denatured ensembles. J Mol Biol 1999; 290: 283–304.
- 64 Beck DAC, Daggett V. A one-dimensional reaction coordinate for identification of transition states from explicit solvent P(fold)-like calculations. Biophys J 2007 93: 3382-3391.
- 65 Scott KA, Randles LG, Moran SJ, Daggett V, Clarke J. The folding pathway of spectrin R17 from experiment and simulation: using experimentally validated MD simulations to characterize states hinted at by experiment. J Mol Biol 2006; 359: 235101.
- 66 Toofanny RD, Jonsson AL, Daggett V. A comprehensive multidimensional-embedded, one-dimensional reaction coordinate for protein unfolding/folding. Biophys J 2010; 98: 2671-2681.
- 67 Tiana G, Camilloni C. Ratcheted molecular-dynamics simulations identify efficiently the transition state of protein folding. J Chem Phys 2012; 137: 235101.
- 68 Li A, Daggett V. Identification and characterization of the unfolding transition state of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1996; 257: 412–429.
- 69 Jonsson AL, Scott KA, Daggett V. Dynameomics: a consensus view of the protein unfolding/folding transition state ensemble across a diverse set of protein folds. Biophys J 2009; 97: 2958–2966.
- 70 Levitt M. Molecular dynamics of native protein II. Analysis and nature of motion. J Mol Biol 1983; 168: 621–657.
- 71 Daggett V, Levitt M. A molecular dynamics simulation of the C-terminal fragment of the L7/L12 ribosomal protein in solution. Chem Phys 1991; 158: 501–512.
- 72 Gianni S, Guydosh NR, Khan F, Caldas TD, Mayor U, White GWN, De Marco ML, Daggett V, Fersht AR. Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 13286–13291.
- 73 Petrovich M, Jonsson AL, Ferguson N, Daggett V, Fersht AR. Phi-analysis at the experimental limits: mechanism of beta-hairpin formation. J Mol Biol 2006; 360: 865–881.
- 74 Witt S, Singh M, Kalisz HM. Structural and kinetic properties of nonglycosylated recombinant Penicillium amagasakiense glucose oxidase expressed in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998; 64: 1405–1411.
- 75 Malkov SN, Zivković MV, Beljanski MV, Hall MB, Zarić SD. A reexamination of the propensities of amino acids towards a particular secondary structure: classification of amino acids based on their chemical structure. J Mol Model 2008; 14: 769–775.
- 76 Chou PY, Fasman GD. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, β-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 1974; 13: 211–222.
- 77 Levitt M. Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry 1978; 17: 4277–4285.
- 78 Gibrat JF, Garnier J, Robson B. Further developments of protein secondary structure prediction using information theory. New parameters and consideration of residue pairs. J Mol. Biol 1987; 198: 425–443.
- 79 Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 10915–10919.
- 80 Eisenmenger M, Reyes-de Corcuera J. High pressure enhancement of enzymes: a review. Enzyme Microb Tech 2009; 45: 331–347.