An Exploratory Investigation of the Ethical Behavior of Engineering Undergraduates
Corresponding Author
Trevor S. Harding Ph.D.
Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering
California Polytechnic State University
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Donald D. Carpenter Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor of Civil Engineering
Lawrence Technological University
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cynthia J. Finelli Ph.D.
Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research Associate Professor of Engineering Education
University of Michigan
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Trevor S. Harding Ph.D.
Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering
California Polytechnic State University
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Donald D. Carpenter Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor of Civil Engineering
Lawrence Technological University
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cynthia J. Finelli Ph.D.
Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research Associate Professor of Engineering Education
University of Michigan
California Polytechnic State University, Bldg. 41–229, 1 Grand Avenue, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile, Southfield, MI 48075-1058; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 208 Gorguze Family Laboratory, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2101; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Recent national reports have indicated the need for an increased emphasis on the ethical development of engineering undergraduates. Despite this call for increased focus on ethical development, little is known about how engineering students make ethical decisions or how these decisions are related to personal differences and environmental influences.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
This is an exploratory investigation to determine which demographic, academic, moral reasoning, and decision-making variables are predictive of the extent of test cheating among engineering undergraduates. Rather than beginning with a particular hypothesis, the study investigates predictive relationships between the variables described above and self-reported rates of test cheating among engineering undergraduates.
Design/Method
Three hundred and eighty eight engineering undergraduates from three Midwestern U.S. institutions completed a survey based on a modified version of the theory of planned behavior as a conceptual framework. The three institutions are of different Carnegie classifications, sizes, missions, and institutional cultures.
Results
Results indicate that our proposed model of ethical decision-making was successful in predicting the behavioral outcome with regard to college test cheating and there were observed significant differences in the level of cheating between institutions. However, institution as a variable was not a predictive of behavior.
Conclusions
The effect of institution on cheating was mitigated through other measured variables including past high school cheating, involvement in Pan-Hellenic groups, moral obligation, and perceived behavioral control. It is these underlying predictive variables that need to be addressed when engineering educators and student affairs staff consider the issue of unethical undergraduate behavior.
References
- Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behaviors from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (15): 1355–1374.
-
Adams, R.,
Fortenberry, S.,
Haghighi, K.,
Imbrie, P. K.,
Jamieson, L.,
Lohmann … Smith, K. (2006). Special Report: The research agenda for the new discipline of engineering education.
Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (4): 259–261.
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00900.x Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
- Ajzen, I. (2002a). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Ajzen, I. (2002b). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6 (2): 107–122.
- Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta–analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
- American Society for Engineering Education. (2003). Profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. American Society for Engineering Education: Washington, D.C.
- Baldwin, D. C., Jr., Daugherty, S. R., Rowley, B. D., & Schwarz, M. D. (1996). Cheating in medical school: a survey of second–year students at 31 schools. Academic Medicine, 71 (3): 267–273.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T.L. (1999, July). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54 (7): 462–479.
- Bargh, J. A., & Fergunson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126 (6) 925–945.
- Bebeau, M. J. (2002). The defining issues test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education. Journal of Moral Education, 31 (3): 271–295.
- Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (2003). Guide for DIT-2: A guide for using the Defining Issues Test, Version 2 (“DIT-2”) and the Scoring. Minneapolis, MN: Center for the Study of Ethical Development.
- Beck, L. & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25 (3): 285–301.
- Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York, NY: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
- Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2009). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from www.carnegiefoundation.orgclassificationsindex.asp.
- Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow, H. J. (2006). Engineering students' perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (3): 181–194.
- Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (15): 1429–1464.
- Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37 (4): 487–502.
- Eve, R. A., & Bromley, D. G. (1981). Scholastic dishonesty among college undergraduates: Parallel tests of two sociological explanations. Youth & Society, 13 (1): 3–22.
- Fass, R. A. (1990). Cheating and plagiarism. In W.W. May (Ed.), Ethics and higher education (pp. 170–184). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S. & Carpenter, D. D. (2007, June). Academic integrity among engineering undergraduates: Seven years of research. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
- Finelli, C. J., Szwalek, J. L., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2005, Oct.). A case study of research in engineering education: Designing, testing, and administering the PACES-2 Survey on academic integrity. Proceedings of the 35th Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
- Generaux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36 (6): 687–704.
- Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E. & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107 (3): 1144–1154.
- Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44 (2): 389–400.
- Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316 (5827): 998–1002.
- Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.
-
Hall, T. L., &
Kuh, G. D. (1998). Honor among students: Academic integrity and honor codes at state–assisted universities.
NASPA Journal, 36 (1): 2–18.
10.2202/0027-6014.1069 Google Scholar
- Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 311–324.
- Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Carpenter, D. D., & Mayhew, M. J. (2006, June). Examining the underlying motivations of engineering undergraduates to behave unethically. Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.
- Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in humanities and engineering undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17 (3): 255–279.
- King, P., & Mayhew, M. J. (2002). Moral judgment development in higher education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test. Journal of Moral Education, 31 (3): 247–270.
- Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
- Kuehn, P., Stanwyck, D. J., & Holland, C. L. (1990). Attitudes toward “cheating” behaviors in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (2), 313–317.
- Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of Cheating: An analysis across countries. The Journal of Economic Education, 33 (2): 125–135.
- Malinowski, C. I., & Smith, C.P. (1985). Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg's theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (4): 1016–1027.
- Mayhew, M. J., Hubbard, S. M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to validate the theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting student cheating. Review of Higher Education, 32 (4): 441–468.
- McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38 (3): 379–396.
- McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11 (3): 219–232.
- Moffat, M. (1990). Undergraduate cheating. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers State University.
- Narvaez, D. & Lapsely, D. K. (2005). The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In D. K. Lapsely & F.C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education, (pp. 140–165). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
- National Academy of Engineering. (2003). Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Engineering (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Science Foundation. (2006). Investing in America's future–National Science Foundation Strategic Plan FY 2006–2011. Retrieved from http:www.nsf.govpublicationspub_summ.jspods_keynsf0648.
-
Nonis, S. A., &
Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation.
Journal of Education for Business, 77 (2): 69–77.
10.1080/08832320109599052 Google Scholar
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Vol.2: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
- Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students' decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47 (7): 643–684.
-
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson,
P. R. Shaver, &
L. S. Wrightman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X Google Scholar
- Peng, C. J., Lee, K. L., & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. Journal of Educational Research, 96 (1): 3–14.
-
Rest, J. R., &
Narvaez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10.4324/9781410601162 Google Scholar
- Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1998). Guide for DIT-2. Minneapolis, MN: Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota.
- Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (1): 5–28.
- Rogers, G. (2002). Rethinking moral growth in college and beyond. Journal of Moral Education, 31 (3): 325–338.
- Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers. Design for the future of the Field. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Sutkus, J. A., Finelli, C. J., Carpenter, D. D., & Harding, T. S. (2009). An examination of student experiences related to engineering ethics: Initial findings. Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, TX.
- Thoma, S. J., & Rest, J. R. (1999). The relationship between moral decision making and patterns of consolidation and transition in moral judgment development. Developmental Psychology, 35 (2): 323–334.
- Whitley, Jr., B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39 (3): 235–274.
- Whitley, Jr., B. E., & Keith–Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Zimny, S. T., Readhead, T., & Heckman, K. (1996, March, Predictors of dishonest behaviors across domains. Paper Presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
