Framing Faculty and Student Discrepancies in Engineering Ethics Education Delivery
Corresponding Author
Matthew A. Holsapple
Doctoral Candidate
University of Michigan
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Donald D. Carpenter
Director of Assessment and Associate Professor of Civil Engineering
Lawrence Technological University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Janel A. Sutkus
Director of Institutional Research and Analysis
Carnegie Mellon University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cynthia J. Finelli
Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research Associate Professor of Engineering Education
University of Michigan
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Trevor S. Harding
Department Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering
California Polytechnic University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Matthew A. Holsapple
Doctoral Candidate
University of Michigan
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Donald D. Carpenter
Director of Assessment and Associate Professor of Civil Engineering
Lawrence Technological University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Janel A. Sutkus
Director of Institutional Research and Analysis
Carnegie Mellon University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Cynthia J. Finelli
Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering and research Associate Professor of Engineering Education
University of Michigan
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Trevor S. Harding
Department Chair and Professor of Materials Engineering
California Polytechnic University
Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, University of Michigan, 610 E. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109; [email protected].
Lawrence Technological University, 21000 W. Ten Mile Road, Southfield, MI, 48075; [email protected].
Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213; [email protected].
University of Michigan, 2609 Draper Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; [email protected].
California Polytechnic State University, 1 Grand Ave., San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
The importance of ethics education in professional engineering preparation programs is well established, yet student outcomes remain mixed despite the efforts of engineering educators.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
A long line of research has suggested that students and faculty often have different perceptions of educational efforts and practices. In this study, we consider this as a potential reason for the continued mixed results of engineering ethics education by examining differing perceptions of faculty and students about ethics education and identifying contributing factors to those differences.
Design/Method
We conducted focus groups and interviews with engineering undergraduate students, faculty, and administrators on 18 campuses. Transcripts were analyzed using both deductive and inductive analyses and constant comparison. We identified both themes of discrepancies between faculty/administrator and student perceptions and factors in the educational environment that contributed to those discrepancies.
Results
Discrepancies between the perceptions of faculty/administrators were seen in two forms. Faculty/administrators believed that ethics education encompasses teaching about laws, ethical codes, and other black-and-white solutions while also addressing more nuanced ethical dilemmas; students reported only experiencing the laws-and-rules approach. Students also did not see faculty as the positive ethical role models that faculty believed they are. Factors that contribute to both types of discrepancies are identified and reported.
Conclusions
This approach can be effective in examining difficulties in teaching engineering ethics. Educators should take steps to understand the different ways faculty/administrators and students perceive ethics education, and how factors in the educational environment contribute to differences in those perceptions.
References
- ABET (2010). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2010–2011 accreditation cycle. Retrieved from http:www.abet.org.
-
Astin, A. W. (1970a). The methodology of research on college impact (Part I).
Sociology of Education, 43 (3): 223–254.
10.2307/2112065 Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W. (1970b). The methodology of research on college impact (Part II). Sociology of Education, 43 (4): 437–450.
- Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
- Bielby, R., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C.J., Carpenter, D. D., Sutkus, J. A., Holsapple, M. A., Burt, B. A., & Ra, E. (2011). Impact of different curricular approaches to ethics education on ethical reasoning ability. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.
- Burt, B. A., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., Sutkus, J. A., Holsapple, M. A., Bielby, R., & Ra, E. (2011). Outcomes of engaging engineering undergraduates in co-curricular experiences. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.
- Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2009). The Carnegie classifications of institutions of higher education. Retrieved from http:www.carnegiefoundation.orgclassifications.
- Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3): 327–338.
-
Corbin, J., &
Strauss, A. (2008). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781452230153 Google Scholar
-
Eagen, M. K., &
Jaeger, A. J. (2008). Closing the gate: Part-time faculty instruction in gatekeeper courses and first-year persistence.
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2008 (115): 39–54.
10.1002/tl.324 Google Scholar
- Falls, M. D. (2009). Psychological sense of community and retention: Rethinking the first-year experience of students in STEM (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http:etd.fcla.eduCFCFE0002841DagleyFalls_Melissa_A_200912_EdD.pdf.
- Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., & Mayhew, M. J. (2007). Academic integrity among engineering undergraduates: Seven years of research by the E3 Team. Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
- Finelli, C. J., Holsapple, M. A., Ra, E., Bielby, R. M., Burt, B.A., Carpenter … Sutkus, J. A. (In Press). Journal of Engineering Education.
- Fritschner, L.M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. Journal of Higher Education, 71 (3): 342–362.
- Gill, D., Heins, M., & Jones, P.B. (1984). Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback. Journal of Medical Education, 59 (11): 856–864.
- Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99 (1): 5–22.
- Goldstein, G. S., & Benassi, V.A. (2006). Students' and instructors' beliefs about excellent lecturers, and discussion leaders. Research in Higher Education, 47 (6): 685–707.
- Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10 (2): 311–324.
- Harding, T. S., Sutkus, J. A., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Engineering culture and the ethical development of undergraduate students. Proceedings of the 2009 International Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Palm Cove, Queensland, Australia.
-
Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta-analysis.
Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (2): 223–229.
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00596.x Google Scholar
- Holsapple, M. A., Sutkus, J. A., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., Burt, B. A., Harding, T. S., & Bielby, R. (2011). We can't get no satisfaction!: The relationship between students' ethical reasoning and their satisfaction with engineering ethics education. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada.
- Holsapple, M. A., Finelli, C. J., Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., & Sutkus, J. A. (2009). Work in progress - A mixed-methods approach to developing an instrument measuring engineering students' positive ethical behavior. Proceedings of the 39th IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
-
Jaeger, A. J., &
Hinz, D. (2008). The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshman retention: A predictive model using logistic regression.
Journal of College Student Retention, 10 (3): 265–286.
10.2190/CS.10.3.b Google Scholar
- Lincoln, T. D. (2009). The seminary experience: Conceptual worlds of first-career and second-career seminarians. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin, TX.
- Lovik, E. G., & Volkwein, J. F. (2010). The impact of organizational features and student experiences on spiritual development during the first year of college. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), Indianapolis, IN.
-
MacLellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (4): 307–318.
10.1080/02602930120063466 Google Scholar
- McGinn, R. E. (2003). ‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997–2001. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9 (4): 517–542.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Miron, M. (1988). Students' evaluation and instructors' self-evaluation of university instruction. Higher Education, 17 (2): 175–181.
- Murphy, C. (2010). Residential learning outcomes: Analysis using the college student experiences questionnaire at a large public research university. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
-
Nasser, F., &
Fresko, B. (2006). Predicting student ratings: The relationship between actual student ratings and instructors' predictions.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (1): 1–18.
10.1080/02602930500262338 Google Scholar
- National Academy of Engineering. (2003). Emerging technologies and ethical issues in engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10 (2): 343–351.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods ( 3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Journal of College Student Development, 50 (6): 659–682.
- Reason, R. D., Cox, B. E., Quaye, B.R.L., & Terenzini, P. T. (2010). Faculty and institutional factors that promote student encounters with difference in first-year courses. Review of Higher Education, 33 (3): 391–414.
- Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2007). Developing social and personal competence in the first year of college. The Review of Higher Education, 30 (3): 271–299.
- Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47 (2): 149–175.
- Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Sutkus, J. A., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Harding, T. S. (2008). Work in progress: Building the Survey of Engineering Ethical Development (SEED) instrument. Proceedings of the 38th Frontiers in Education Conference, Sarasota Springs, NY.
- Terenzini, P. T., & Reason, R. D. (2005). Parsing the first year of college: Rethinking the effects of college on students. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.
- Turns, J., Eliot, M., Neal, R., & Linse, A. (2007). Investigating the teaching concerns of engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (4): 295–308.
-
Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
23 (2): 191–211.
10.1080/0260293980230207 Google Scholar
