Volume 37, Issue S3 pp. 73-80
Comparative modeling: Prediction Report

Addressing the issue of sequence-to-structure alignments in comparative modeling of CASP3 target proteins

Česlovas Venclovas

Corresponding Author

Česlovas Venclovas

Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551===Search for more papers by this author
Krzysztof Ginalski

Krzysztof Ginalski

Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

Search for more papers by this author
Krzysztof Fidelis

Krzysztof Fidelis

Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California

Search for more papers by this author

This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Abstract

During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/casp3/), four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 62%, 29%, 24%, and 19% sequence identity, respectively, to the structurally homologous proteins most similar in sequence. The issue of sequence-to-structure alignment in cases of low sequence homology was the main emphasis. Selection of alignments was made by constructing and evaluating three-dimensional models based on series of samples produced mainly by automatic multiple sequence alignments. Sequence-to-structure alignments were correct in all but two regions, in which significant changes in target structures compared with related proteins were the source of errors. Template choice is an important determinant of model quality, and a correct selection was made of a lower homology template for modeling of T0070; however, in the case of T0055, a template with 8% greater sequence homology proved deceptive. Loops and some ungapped template regions were assigned conformations taken from other proteins. Using fragments from homologous structures led to improvement over template backbone more often than cases in which nonhomologous structures were the source. The results also indicate that side-chain prediction accuracy depends not only on sequence similarity but also on accuracy of the backbone. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:73–80. Published 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.