Volume 16, Issue 6 e13560
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Open Access

Glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes in relation to achieved glycemic control. A Danish nationwide study

Bochra Zareini

Corresponding Author

Bochra Zareini

Department of Cardiology, North Zealand University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

Correspondence

Bochra Zareini, Department of Cardiology, North Zealand University Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 2400 Hillerød, Denmark.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Katrine Kold Sørensen

Katrine Kold Sørensen

Department of Cardiology, North Zealand University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard

Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard

Department of Endocrinology and Nephrology, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Emil Loldrup Fosbøl

Emil Loldrup Fosbøl

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Køber

Lars Køber

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Torp-Pedersen

Christian Torp-Pedersen

Department of Cardiology, North Zealand University Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 May 2024
Citations: 2

Abstract

Aim

To compare the cardiovascular preventive effect associated with glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) according to the achieved target level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Methods

We used retrospective Danish registries to include type 2 diabetes patients already in metformin treatment initiating GLP-1 RA or DPP-4i between 2007 and 2021. Patients were included 6 months after GLP-1 RA or DPP-4i initiation. The last available HbA1c measurement before inclusion was collected. The achieved HbA1c level was categorized according to a target level below or above 53 mmol/mol (7%). The primary outcome was a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause death. We used a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the effect of HbA1c levels on the outcome among GLP-1 RA users compared to DPP-4i users.

Results

The study included 13 634 GLP-1 RA users (median age 56.9, interquartile range [IQR]: 48.5–65.5; 53% males) and 39 839 DPP-4i users (median age 63.4, IQR: 54.6–71.8; 61% males). The number of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4i users according to achieved HbA1c levels were as follows: HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%): 3026 (22%) versus 4824 (12%); HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol (>7.0%): 6577 (48%) versus 17 508 (44%); missing HbA1c: 4031 (30%) versus 17 507 (44%). During a median follow-up of 5 years (IQR: 2.6–5.0), 954 GLP-1 RA users experienced the primary outcome compared to 7093 DPP-4i users. The 5-year risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the outcome associated with GLP1-RA versus DPP-4i according to HbA1c categories was as follows: HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol: 10.3% (8.2–12.3) versus 24.3% (22.7–25.8); HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol: 16.0% (14.3–17.6) versus 21.1% (20.3–21.9); missing HbA1c: 17.1% (15.7–18.5) versus 25.6% (24.9–26.3). The preventive effect associated with GLP-1 RA versus DPP-4i was significantly enhanced when achieving lower HbA1c levels: HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol: 0.65 (0.52–0.80); HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol: 0.92 (0.83–1.03); missing HbA1c: 0.92 (0.84–1.02) (p value for interaction <.001).

Conclusion

GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower rate of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The association was stronger in patients achieving the target glycemic level and weaker in patients not achieving the target glycemic level, suggestive of an interaction between achieved HbA1c level and GLP-1 RA.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.