Volume 32, Issue 5 pp. 1034-1046
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pilot feasibility study of the Walking Away from Diabetes programme for adults with intellectual disabilities in two further education colleges: Process evaluation findings

Andrew Maine

Corresponding Author

Andrew Maine

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Correspondence

Andrew Maine, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Michael J. Brown

Michael J. Brown

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Adele Dickson

Adele Dickson

Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Truesdale

Maria Truesdale

Edinburgh Napier University School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 April 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

Background

People with intellectual disabilities remain at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to lifestyle-associated risk factors. Educational programmes have been adapted for people with intellectual disabilities targeting ongoing T2D self-management. However, there are no adapted programmes which aim to prevent T2D through reducing risk factors. The present study initiates addressing this gap.

Methods

Further education (FE) colleges in Scotland were recruited for feasibility study using the Walking Away (WA) from Diabetes programme. Process evaluation assessed recruitment, retention, baseline physical activity levels, and acceptability and accessibility using focus groups.

Results

Ninety six percent of invited students agreed to participate. WA was positively received, and some short-term impact was described. Suggestions for further adaptations regarding materials, delivery and content were provided, including delivery embedded within FE college curriculum.

Conclusions

Recruitment, retention and acceptability provide rationale for further research on T2D prevention in FE colleges.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.