Volume 50, Issue 7 pp. 931-939
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Intravenous combined with intrabiliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinomas

Wang Jianxiong MD

Corresponding Author

Wang Jianxiong MD

Department of Ultrasound, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China

Correspondence

Wang Jianxiong, Department of Ultrasound, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, No. 6 Changjiang Road, Nankai District, 300100, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Wu Yu PhD

Wu Yu PhD

Department of Ultrasound, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wang Juyi MD

Wang Juyi MD

Department of Ultrasound, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wang Guangxia MD

Wang Guangxia MD

Department of Ultrasound, Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Tianjin University, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 July 2022

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the application value of combined intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IV-CEUS) with intrabiliary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (IB-CEUS) in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) resectability.

Methods

Clinical data from 82 patients with HCCA confirmed by surgery and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were performed and the results were compared with surgical and pathological findings.

Results

The accuracy of the Bismuth-Corlette classification confirmed by IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS and MRCP was 95.12% (78/82) and 87.8% (72/82), respectively. The diagnostic precision of IV-CEUS + IB-CEUS was better than MRCP (p = 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and precision of CEUS for diagnosing lymph node metastases (72.7%, 93.3%, and 87.8%), intrahepatic metastases (78.6%, 98.5%, and 93.9%), invasion of the hepatic artery (92.9%, 98.5%, and 97.6%) and invasion of the portal vein (93.8%, 98.5%, and 97.6%) of HCCA were, respectively. The consistency between the preoperative evaluation of resectability confirmed by IV-CEUS +IB-CEUS and MRCP was 85.4% (70/82) and 78.0% (64/82), respectively. In addition, the evaluations did not have statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two evaluations (p = 0.266).

Conclusion

IV-CEUS combined with IB-CEUS has significant value in classifying HCCA and evaluating the resectability of lymph node metastases, liver metastases, and vessel invasion.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors declared that no conflicts of interest in this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated and used are presented in this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.