Volume 32, Issue 12 e13947
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

High-resolution manometry features of paraesophageal hernia

Arvind Rengarajan

Arvind Rengarajan

Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Julieta Argüero

Julieta Argüero

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary Institute of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Etsuro Yazaki

Etsuro Yazaki

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary Institute of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
S. Sritharan Kadirkamanthan

S. Sritharan Kadirkamanthan

Division of General Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
H. P. Priyantha Siriwardana

H. P. Priyantha Siriwardana

Division of General Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
L. Michael Brunt

L. Michael Brunt

Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Sifrim

Daniel Sifrim

Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary Institute of London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
C. Prakash Gyawali

Corresponding Author

C. Prakash Gyawali

Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA

Correspondence

C. Prakash Gyawali, Division of Gastroenterology, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 July 2020
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) can be associated with obstructive symptoms, but high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics have not been described in detail.

Methods

HRM studies of confirmed PEH patients (n = 60, 66.3 ± 1.5 years, 76.7% F), axial hernias (n = 125, 56.1 ± 1.1 years, 58.4% F), and healthy controls (n = 20, 27.9 ± 0.7 years, 45% F) were analyzed. Axial hernias (type 1) were compared to PEH subtyped as isolated PEH (type 2), PEH with axial hernia (type 3), PEH with herniated abdominal organs (type 4), and unknown. Distal contractile integral (DCI), esophageal length, lower esophageal sphincter pressures (LESP), EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were extracted. Intra-luminal pressures were measured proximal (intrabolus pressure, IBP) and distal (intragastric pressure, IGP) to EGJ. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to characterize esophageal and EGJ motor physiology in PEH.

Key Results

PEH patients had LESP and EGJ-CI similar to controls; axial hernia patients had lower LESP. While IRP was within normal limits, PEH had elevated IBP and IGP, and shorter esophageal length compared to axial hernia and normal controls (P ≤ .0001 across groups). Short esophageal length was consistent across PEH subtypes (P = .06). On multivariate regression analysis, IBP remained an independent predictor of PEH (P < .0001). Within PEH subtypes, gastric pressure was higher when axial HH was also present, in contrast to isolated PEH (P = .03); other metrics did not differ.

Conclusions & Inferences

Luminal pressure increase both upstream and downstream of the EGJ on HRM likely represents obstructive phenomena in PEH, identification of which may support suspicion of PEH.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

AR, MJA, EY, SSK, HPPS, and LMB: None; DS: Research support: Diversatek, Reckitt-Benckiser; OMOM®, Jinshan Science & Technology (Group) Co. Ltd., Chongqing, China, Alfa Sigma Italy; CPG consultation: Medtronic, Diversatek, Quintiles, Ironwood and IsoThrive.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.