Volume 43, Issue 8 pp. 1783-1792
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

EUS-guided coil and glue injection versus endoscopic glue injection for gastric varices: International multicentre propensity-matched analysis

Jayanta Samanta

Corresponding Author

Jayanta Samanta

Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence

Jayanta Samanta, Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Sector -12, Chandigarh -160012, India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Zaheer Nabi

Zaheer Nabi

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
Antonio Facciorusso

Antonio Facciorusso

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Jahnvi Dhar

Jahnvi Dhar

Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Wahid Akbar

Wahid Akbar

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
Aritra Das

Aritra Das

Care India Solutions, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Chhagan Lal Birda

Chhagan Lal Birda

Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Benedetto Mangiavillano

Benedetto Mangiavillano

Humanitas Mater Domini, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Auriemma

Francesco Auriemma

Humanitas Mater Domini, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Stefano Francesco Crino

Stefano Francesco Crino

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The pancreas institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Rakesh Kochhar

Rakesh Kochhar

Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sundeep Lakhtakia

Sundeep Lakhtakia

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
Duvvur Nageshwar Reddy

Duvvur Nageshwar Reddy

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 June 2023
Citations: 1

Jayanta Samanta and Zaheer Nabi be considered as co-first authors.

Abstract

Background

Gastric varices (GVs) are conventionally managed with endoscopic cyanoacrylate (E-CYA) glue injection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapy using combination of coils and CYA glue (EUS-CG) is a relatively recent modality. There is limited data comparing the two techniques.

Methodology

This international multicentre study included patients with GV undergoing endotherapy from two Indian and two Italian tertiary care centres. Patients undergoing EUS-CG were compared with propensity-matched E-CYA cases from a cohort of 218 patients. Procedural details such as amount of glue, number of coils used, number of sessions required for obliteration, bleeding after index procedure rates and need for re-intervention were noted.

Results

Of 276 patients, 58 (male 42, 72.4%; mean age—44.3 ± 12.1 years) underwent EUS-CG and were compared with 118 propensity-matched cases of E-CYA. In the EUS-CG arm, complete obliteration at 4 weeks was noted in 54 (93.1%) cases. Compared to the E-CYA cohort, EUS-CG arm showed significantly lower number of session (1.0 vs. 1.5; p < 0.0001) requirement, lower subsequent-bleeding episodes (13.8% vs. 39.1%; p < 0.0001) and lower re-intervention (12.1% vs. 50.4%; p < 0.001) rates. On multivariable regression analysis, size of the varix (aOR-1.17; CI 1.08–1.26) and technique of therapy (aOR-14.71; CI 4.32–50.0) were significant predictors of re-bleeding. A maximum GV size >17.5 mm had a 69% predictive accuracy for need for re-intervention.

Conclusion

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy of GV using coil and CYA glue is a safe technique with better efficacy and lower re-bleeding rates on follow-up compared to the conventional endoscopic CYA therapy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

All the authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.