Volume 34, Issue 6 pp. 640-644
ENIGMA PORTAL
Open Access

Quiz case: Abnormal haematopoietic cells in pleural effusion

Diane Frankel

Corresponding Author

Diane Frankel

APHM, INSERM, MMG, Hôpital la Timone, Service de Biologie Cellulaire, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France

Correspondence

Diane Frankel, INSERM, MMG, U1251, Aix Marseille University, Faculty of Medicine la Timone, 27, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille 13385, France.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Elise Kaspi

Elise Kaspi

APHM, INSERM, MMG, Hôpital la Timone, Service de Biologie Cellulaire, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France

Search for more papers by this author
Sylvie Cointe

Sylvie Cointe

APHM, INSERM, C2VN, APHM, Hôpital la Timone, Plateforme de cytométrie, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France

Search for more papers by this author
Bruno Valentin

Bruno Valentin

Service de Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalier de Martigues, Martigues, France

Search for more papers by this author
Patrice Roll

Patrice Roll

APHM, INSERM, MMG, Hôpital la Timone, Service de Biologie Cellulaire, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 August 2023

Graphical Abstract

This case was presented because of the number of plasmablasts in a patient with a medical history of multiple myeloma. Flow cytometry is a “gold standard” technique for the diagnosis of haematological malignancies. This technique works for all fluids and should be performed in effusions (pleural, pericardial, ascites) in cases of suspected haematological malignancy. Alternatively, immunohistochemistry using appropriate markers could be performed if flow cytometry is not available.

This case illustrates a pleural infiltration by plasmablasts. Myelomatous cells were characterised by immunocytochemistry and flow cytometry.

1 CASE HISTORY

A 66-year-old non-smoking man presented to the emergency department with dyspnea and severe chest pain. He had had bronchitis for the past 15 days, and had been treated with antibiotics and corticoids without improvement. The computed tomography scan showed a massive pleural effusion on the left side. The pleural effusion was punctured and a cytological analysis performed. In the patient's medical history, there is multiple myeloma in remission for 2 years, sarcoidosis, and type 2 diabetes.

The cytological picture is shown in Figure 1.

Details are in the caption following the image
Representative images of plasmablasts with (A,B) May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining, (B) Papanicolaou staining

2 MORPHOLOGY QUIZ

1. What is your diagnosis based on the cytological images:
  1. Reactive mesothelial cells.
  2. Mesothelioma.
  3. Adenocarcinoma.
  4. Haematological malignancy.
2. Which of the following analyses would you use to confirm the diagnosis?
  1. Immunocytochemistry using BerEP4 antibody.
  2. Immunocytochemistry using WT1 antibody.
  3. Immunocytochemistry using CD45, CD19, CD3, CD38, and CD138 antibodies.
  4. Flow cytometry analysis.
3. Flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry were performed on the pleural effusion. The results are shown in Figure 2. What is your final diagnosis?
  1. High grade lymphoma.
  2. Hodgkin lymphoma.
  3. Multiple myeloma with plasmablasts.
  4. Acute lymphocytic leukaemia.
Details are in the caption following the image
(A-C) Flow cytometry results, using (A) CD45, (B) CD38 and CD138, (C) lambda and kappa light chains antibodies. Malignant cells show positivity for CD45, CD138, CD38, and kappa light chain. (D,E) Immunocytochemistry with peroxidase staining, using (D) cytokeratin, and (E) CD45 antibodies. Malignant cells show a positivity for CD45. Cells with brown staining in (D) are mesothelial cells. SS: side scatter, FITC: fluorescein isothiocyanate, APC: allophycocianin, PE: phycoerythrin

ANSWERS TO THE QUIZ

  1. The nature of the chromatin staining, the deep blue cytoplasmic staining, and the large and multiple nucleoli point to a haematological malignancy (D).
  2. Flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry using CD45, CD19, CD3, CD38, and CD138 can characterise these haematopoietic cells (C).
  3. CD45 positivity confirms the presence of haematopoietic cells. CD138 and CD38 positivity associated with kappa monoclonal expression confirm the presence of plasma cells and support a diagnosis of multiple myeloma relapse (C).

3 EXPLANATION

Cytological examination points to a haematological disease: one or more prominent nucleoli, chromatin appearance, and the deep blue staining of the cytoplasm. For comparison, mesothelial cells are indicated by an asterisk * in Figure 4 (corresponding to Figure 1, with annotation). Typical myelomatous plasma cells are shown in Figure 3A,B (black arrows). Plasma cells are round to ovoid with a round eccentric nucleus, clock face or spoke wheel chromatin with a nucleolus, an extensive deep blue staining cytoplasm with a perinuclear clear zone corresponding to the Golgi apparatus.1 Myelomatous plasma cells show morphological abnormalities in 50% of cases. Nuclear abnormalities include diffuse chromatin pattern, increased nucleocytoplasmic ratio, prominent nucleolus, anisokaryosis, and nuclear irregularity (including blebs, multilobulated nucleus, irregular nuclear contour, or clover-leaf shaped nucleus). Plasmablasts are immature plasma cells characterised by a large nucleus, nucleocytoplasmic ratio of >0.6, finely dispersed chromatin with a prominent nucleolus, and no perinuclear clear zone. These cytological criteria correspond to immaturity or aggressiveness of plasma cells.2

Details are in the caption following the image
(A,B) Typical myelomatous plasma cells (black arrows). (C) Large B cell lymphoma with plasmacytoid morphology
Details are in the caption following the image
Corresponds to Figure 1 with annotations. Mesothelial cells are indicated with asterisks. Typical plasma cells are indicated with black arrows

Both immunocytochemistry with appropriate markers or flow cytometry can be performed to confirm the origin of malignant cells.3 Plasma cells are usually detected by flow cytometry using the following markers: CD45, CD138, CD38, CD56, CD34, CD19, and CD117, and kappa and lambda light chains.4 Myelomatous plasma cells are characterised by negative CD19 expression (>95% of cases), weak or negative CD45 expression (70%-45% of cases), kappa or lambda cytoplasmic restriction, and moderate to strong CD56 expression (60%-80% of cases).5 In the presented case, malignant cells were CD45 weak, CD138+, CD38+, kappa light chain (99.97% of plasma cells), CD200+, CD27+, CD56− and CD19−. If flow cytometry cannot be performed, immunohistochemistry is useful using CD138, MUM1 (Multiple Myeloma Oncogene 1), kappa and lambda light chains.

In this case, the cytology was atypical, and flow cytometry was performed to confirm the nature of malignant cells. The absence of spoke wheel chromatin, the elevated nucleocytoplasmic ratio, the multiple nucleoli, and the clover-leaf shaped nuclei tend to classify these abnormal cells more as plasmablasts rather than plasma cells. The plasmablastic morphology can be seen at diagnosis but is more commonly observed when plasmablast transformation occurs in known cases of plasma cell myeloma. The presence of plasmablasts is a poor prognostic factor associated with high tumour proliferation and shortened survival.6

A differential diagnosis to plasma cell neoplasm with plasmablasts is plasmablastic lymphoma.7 It is a highly aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma frequently associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or other immunodeficiencies. It represents 1% of large B cell lymphomas and 2% of all HIV-related lymphomas. Plasmablastic lymphoma cells express CD79a, MUM1, BLIMP1, XBP1, CD38, and CD138. They are negative for CD19, CD20, and PAX5.3, 8 Features favouring plasmablastic lymphoma are association with HIV, whereas features favouring multiple myeloma are monoclonal paraproteinemia, hypercalcemia, lytic bone lesions, and renal dysfunction. Another differential diagnosis is large B cell lymphoma with plasmacytoid morphology (Figure 3C). In this case B cell markers such as CD19, CD20, or PAX5 are positive. In the case presented, the medical history helped to orient the diagnosis.

Myelomatous pleural effusion (MPE) is a form of extramedullary disease with infiltration of the pleural cavity by plasma cells. It occurs in 1% to 2% of patients with multiple myeloma and is predominantly a unilateral effusion.9, 10 It can be present at diagnosis or during follow-up. As for complex karyotypic abnormalities, MPE in patients with multiple myeloma is associated with high-risk disease. MPE is associated with poor prognosis and short survival times, with a median between 2.4 to 13 months.9, 11, 12

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Diane Frankel and Sylvie Cointe: Data collection. Diane Frankel: Writing the manuscript. Elise Kaspi, Patrice Roll, Sylvie Cointe, and Bruno Valentin: Reviewing the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Michael Mitchell for his contribution.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

    INFORMED CONSENT

    The patient described in this report gave his informed consent to the anonymous publication of our clinical findings in his case.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.