1Herman A, de Montjoye L, Tromme I et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by medical devices for diabetes patients: a review. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79: 331–5.
10.1111/cod.13120
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2Ng KL, Nixon RL, Grills C, Tam MM. Solution using Stomahesive^® wafers for allergic contact dermatitis caused by isobornyl acrylate in glucose monitoring sensors. Australas J Dermatol 2021; https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.13675.
10.1111/ajd.13675
Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Nath N, Reeder M, Atwater AR. Isobornyl acrylate and diabetic devices steal the show for the 2020 American Contact Dermatitis Society allergen of the year. Cutis 2020; 105: 283–5.
10.12788/cutis.0014
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Ahrensbøll-Friis U, Simonsen AB, Zachariae C et al. Contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors, insulin pumps, and tapes: results from a 5-year period. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 84: 75–81.
10.1111/cod.13664
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5Lombardo F, Salzano G, Crisafulli G et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: an emerging issue. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 162: 108098.
10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108089
Web of Science® Google Scholar
6Schwensen JF, Friis UF, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Sensitization to cyanoacrylates caused by prolonged exposure to a glucose sensor set in a diabetic child. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74: 124–5.
10.1111/cod.12503
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Ulriksdotter J, Svedman C, Bruze M, Mowitz M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by dipropylene glycol diacrylate in the Omnipod^® insulin pump. Br J Dermatol 2022; 186: 334–40.
10.1111/bjd.20751
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume186, Issue2

February 2022

Pages 212-213

Time for a change

Abstract

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Time for a change

Abstract

References

References

Related

Information