Volume 92, Issue 6 pp. 1415-1422
OTOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY

Use of telemedicine consultations in head and neck cancer: patient perceptions, acceptability and accessibility

Kaman Dhillon MBBS

Corresponding Author

Kaman Dhillon MBBS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Kaman Dhillon, 305 Grattan Street, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Jamil Manji MSc, MD

Jamil Manji MSc, MD

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Mario Tapia Céspedes MD

Mario Tapia Céspedes MD

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Prasad MBBS, FRACS

Jessica Prasad MBBS, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Kleid MBBS, FRACS

Stephen Kleid MBBS, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel Flatman MBBS, FRACS

Samuel Flatman MBBS, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Nguyen MBBS, FRACS

Kevin Nguyen MBBS, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy McLean MBBS, FRACS

Timothy McLean MBBS, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew Magarey BMed, FRACS

Matthew Magarey BMed, FRACS

Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Medical Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 May 2022
Citations: 3
K. Dhillon MBBS; J. Manji MSc, MD; M. Tapia Céspedes MD; J. Prasad MBBS, FRACS; S. Kleid MBBS, FRACS; S. Flatman MBBS, FRACS; K. Nguyen MBBS, FRACS; T. McLean MBBS, FRACS; M. Magarey BMed, FRACS.

Abstract

Backgrounds

Telemedicine has been effective in the management of various medical conditions, however, there is limited knowledge of its use in head and neck oncosurveillance. This is of importance currently while trying to mitigate the risk of transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to evaluate acceptability, satisfaction and perceptions of telemedicine technology among outpatients for head and neck oncologic surveillance.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted for head and neck surgical oncology patients who attended telemedicine consultations between March and October 2020 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Data on demographic, socioeconomic and acceptability variables was collected, utilizing Likert scale questions. The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction and perceptions, while the secondary outcome was access to technology.

Results

One hundred and fifteen patients were invited to participate, and 100 were included in the final analysis; 95% of patient's had a positive experience with telemedicine appointments and were willing to have future telemedicine appointments. Regional and rural patients were more accepting of telemedicine consultations, citing savings in travel time and the minimal disruption to normal day-to-day activities. All participants had access to telecommunication devices, with 63% having three or more devices. Issues identified include a lack of physical examination by clinician for 65% of participants and the inability to self-examine for 88% of participants.

Conclusion

The study demonstrates patients' acceptance of telemedicine appointments as a component of outpatient surveillance for head and neck surgical oncology. This has benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to increasing accessibility for rural patients.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.