Volume 90, Issue 11 pp. 2264-2268
HEPATOPANCREATICOBILIARY SURGERY

The incidence of symptomatic remnant gall bladder: a population study

Luke Bradshaw FRACS

Corresponding Author

Luke Bradshaw FRACS

Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Dr Luke Bradshaw St Vincent's Hospital 41 Victoria Pde, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Lawrence Lau FRACS

Lawrence Lau FRACS

Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Brett Knowles FRACS

Brett Knowles FRACS

Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

HPB Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Adrian Fox FRACS

Adrian Fox FRACS

Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Department of Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Simon W. Banting FRACS

Simon W. Banting FRACS

Hepatobiliary and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 June 2020
Citations: 15
L. Bradshaw FRACS; L. Lau FRACS; B. Knowles FRACS; A. Fox FRACS; S. W. Banting FRACS.

Abstract

Background

Subtotal cholecystectomy is utilized in conditions of high risk to critical structures, like the common bile duct. However, the remnant gall bladder may become symptomatic and require a completion cholecystectomy for treatment. This second procedure can itself be a risk to critical structures. To establish the incidence of redo-cholecystectomy and identify risk factors that lead to subtotal cholecystectomy and repeat operation in a review of state-based practices for cholecystectomy.

Methods

A search of state coding records relating to cholecystectomy from 1998 to 2016. Patients who were coded for cholecystectomy-related procedures on different dates were identified. Patients who underwent the procedures within 6 months were excluded to avoid acute post-operative complications and gall bladder malignancy.

Results

210 719 cholecystectomies were performed. 1133 required repeat procedure. 616 were excluded, leaving 516 (0.25%) cholecystectomy patients requiring a second cholecystectomy. The subsequent operation was more likely to be an emergency procedure; involve transcystic bile duct exploration, adhesiolysis and require intensive care unit admission post-operatively. A repeat cholecystectomy was more likely to occur after having the primary procedure at a public hospital and when an intra-operative cholangiogram was not performed. Over the study period, the rate of repeat cholecystectomy increased from 0.02% to 0.6%. Incidentally, the rate of intra-operative cholangiogram during a primary cholecystectomy increased from 43% to 73%.

Conclusions

Repeat cholecystectomy is an uncommon procedure. A second cholecystectomy is a more complex and likely to require intensive care unit support. Referral to a tertiary hepatobiliary unit is recommended.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.