A miniaturized technique for assessing protein thermodynamics and function using fast determination of quantitative cysteine reactivity
Corresponding Author
Daniel G. Isom
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
UNC, Chapel Hill, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 120 Mason Farm Road, CB 7260, RM 4048 GM, Chapel Hill, NC 27599===Search for more papers by this authorPhilippe R. Marguet
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorTerrence G. Oas
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorHomme W. Hellinga
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Daniel G. Isom
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
UNC, Chapel Hill, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 120 Mason Farm Road, CB 7260, RM 4048 GM, Chapel Hill, NC 27599===Search for more papers by this authorPhilippe R. Marguet
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorTerrence G. Oas
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorHomme W. Hellinga
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Protein thermodynamic stability is a fundamental physical characteristic that determines biological function. Furthermore, alteration of thermodynamic stability by macromolecular interactions or biochemical modifications is a powerful tool for assessing the relationship between protein structure, stability, and biological function. High-throughput approaches for quantifying protein stability are beginning to emerge that enable thermodynamic measurements on small amounts of material, in short periods of time, and using readily accessible instrumentation. Here we present such a method, fast quantitative cysteine reactivity, which exploits the linkage between protein stability, sidechain protection by protein structure, and structural dynamics to characterize the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of proteins. In this approach, the reaction of a protected cysteine and thiol-reactive fluorogenic indicator is monitored over a gradient of temperatures after a short incubation time. These labeling data can be used to determine the midpoint of thermal unfolding, measure the temperature dependence of protein stability, quantify ligand-binding affinity, and, under certain conditions, estimate folding rate constants. Here, we demonstrate the fQCR method by characterizing these thermodynamic and kinetic properties for variants of Staphylococcal nuclease and E. coli ribose-binding protein engineered to contain single, protected cysteines. These straightforward, information-rich experiments are likely to find applications in protein engineering and functional genomics. Proteins 2011. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials.pdf14.7 KB | Supporting Information Materials. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials1.nbp53.4 KB | Supporting Information Materials 1. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials2.nbp123.5 KB | Supporting Information Materials 2. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials3.nbp50.9 KB | Supporting Information Materials 3. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials4.nbp268.3 KB | Supporting Information Materials 4. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials5.nbp526.3 KB | Supporting Information Materials 5. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials6.pdf126.5 KB | Supporting Information Materials 6. |
PROT_22932_sm_SuppMaterials7.pdf159.8 KB | Supporting Information Materials 7. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Snyder M,Gallagher JEG. Systems biology from a yeast omics perspective. FEBS Lett 2009; 583: 3895–3899.
- 2 DeRisi J,Iyer V,Brown P. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997; 278: 680–686.
- 3 Zhu H,Bilgin M,Bangham R,Hall D,Casamayor A,Bertone P,Lan N,Jansen R,Bidlingmaier S,Houfek T,Mitchell T,Miller P,Dean R,Gerstein M,Snyder M. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 2001; 293: 2101–2105.
- 4 Choudhary C,Kumar C,Gnad F,Nielsen ML,Rehman M,Walther TC,Olsen JV,Mann M. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 2009; 325: 834–840.
- 5 Kung LA,Tao S-C,Qian J,Smith MG,Snyder M,Zhu H. Global analysis of the glycoproteome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals new roles for protein glycosylation in eukaryotes. Mol Syst Biol 2009; 5: 308.
- 6 Peng J,Schwartz D,Elias JE,Thoreen CC,Cheng D,Marsischky G,Roelofs J,Finley D,Gygi SP. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nature Biotechnol 2003; 21: 921–926.
- 7 Ptacek J,Devgan G,Michaud G,Zhu H,Zhu X,Fasolo J,Guo H,Jona G,Breitkreutz A,Sopko R,McCartney RR,Schmidt MC,Rachidi N,Lee S-J,Mah AS,Meng L,Stark MJR,Stern DF,De Virgilio C,Tyers M,Andrews B,Gerstein M,Schweitzer B,Predki PF,Snyder M. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005; 438: 679–684.
- 8 Wohlschlegel JA,Johnson ES,Reed SI,Yates JR. Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 45662–45668.
- 9 Agard NJ,Wells JA. Methods for the proteomic identification of protease substrates. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009; 13: 503–509.
- 10 Doucet A,Butler GS,Rodríguez D,Prudova A,Overall CM. Metadegradomics: toward in vivo quantitative degradomics of proteolytic post-translational modifications of the cancer proteome. Mol Cellular Proteomics 2008; 7: 1925–1951.
- 11 Belle A,Tanay A,Bitincka L,Shamir R,O'Shea EK. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 13004–13009.
- 12 Matthews BW. Protein Structure Initiative: getting into gear. Nature Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14: 459–460.
- 13 Weigelt J,McBroom-Cerajewski LDB,Schapira M,Zhao Y,Arrowsmith CH. Structural genomics and drug discovery: all in the family. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2008; 12: 32–39.
- 14 Zhang Y,Thiele I,Weekes D,Li Z,Jaroszewski L,Ginalski K,Deacon AM,Wooley J,Lesley SA,Wilson IA,Palsson B,Osterman A,Godzik A. Three-dimensional structural view of the central metabolic network of Thermatoga maritime. Science 2009; 325: 1544–1549.
- 15 Pace C,McGrath T. Substrate stabilization of lysozyme to thermal and guanidine-hydrochloride denaturation. J Biol Chem 1980; 255: 3862–3865.
- 16 Schellman J. Macromolecular binding. Biopolymers 1975; 14: 999–1018.
- 17 Waldron T,Murphy K. Stabilization of proteins by ligand binding: application to drug screening and determination of unfolding energetics. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 5058–5064.
- 18 Xie D,Gulnik S,Erickson J. Dissection of binding energy with native and ligand-bound protein stabilities: determining the affinity of ultratight-binding inhibitors of HIV-1 protease and its drug-resistance mutants. J Am Chem Soc 2000; 122: 11533–11534.
- 19 Boeckler F,Joerger A,Jaggi G,Rutherford T,Veprintsev D,Fersht A. Targeted rescue of a destabilized mutant of p53 by an in silico screened drug. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 10360–10365.
- 20 Rutherford K,Alphandéry E,McMillan A,Daggett V,Parson WW. The V108M mutation decreases the structural stability of catechol O-methyltransferase. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1784: 1098–1105.
- 21 Hagihara Y,Tan Y,Goto Y. Comparison of the conformational stability of the molten globule and native states of horse cytochrome c. Effects of acetylation, heat, urea and guanidine-hydrochloride. J Mol Biol 1994; 237: 336–348.
- 22 Nosworthy NJ,Peterkofsky A,König S,Seok YJ,Szczepanowski RH,Ginsburg A. Phosphorylation destabilizes the amino-terminal domain of enzyme I of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. Biochemistry 1998; 37: 6718–6726.
- 23 Parsell D,Sauer R. The structural stability of a protein is an important determinant of its proteolytic susceptibility in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1989; 264: 7590–7595.
- 24 Sinha S,Surolia A. Attributes of glycosylation in the establishment of the unfolding pathway of soybean agglutinin. Biophys J 2007; 92: 208–216.
- 25 Toska K,Kleppe R,Armstrong C,Morrice N,Cohen P,Haavik J. Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase by stress-activated protein kinases. J Neurochem 2002; 83: 775–783.
- 26 Isom D,Vardy E,Oas T,Hellinga H. Picomole-scale characterization of protein stability and function by quantitative cysteine reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 4908–4913.
- 27 Niesen FH,Berglund H,Vedadi M. The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability. Nature Protocols 2007; 2: 2212–2221.
- 28 Pantoliano M,Petrella E,Kwasnoski J,Lobanov V,Myslik J,Graf E,Carver T,Asel E,Springer B,Lane P,Salemme F. High-density miniaturized thermal shift assays as a general strategy for drug discovery. J Biomol Screening 2001; 6: 429–440.
- 29 Ghaemmaghami S,Fitzgerald M,Oas T. A quantitative, high-throughput screen for protein stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 8296–8301.
- 30 Park C,Marqusee S. Pulse proteolysis: a simple method for quantitative determination of protein stability and ligand binding. Nature Methods 2005; 2: 207–212.
- 31 West GM,Tang L,Fitzgerald MC. Thermodynamic analysis of protein stability and ligand binding using a chemical modification- and mass spectrometry-based strategy. Anal Chem 2008; 80: 4175–4185.
- 32 Cimmperman P,Baranauskiene L,Jachimoviciūte S,Jachno J,Torresan J,Michailoviene V,Matuliene J,Sereikaite J,Bumelis V,Matulis D. A quantitative model of thermal stabilization and destabilization of proteins by ligands. Biophys J 2008; 95: 3222–3231.
- 33 Powell KD,Fitzgerald MC. High-throughput screening assay for the tunable selection of protein ligands. J Combinatorial Chem 2004; 6: 262–269.
- 34 Huyghues-Despointes BM,Pace CN,Englander SW,Scholtz JM. Measuring the conformational stability of a protein by hydrogen exchange. Methods Mol Biol 2001; 168: 69–92.
- 35 Cox JC,Lape J,Sayed MA,Hellinga HW. Protein fabrication automation. Protein Sci 2007; 16: 379–390.
- 36 Studier F. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expression and Purification 2005; 41: 207–234.
- 37 Gill S,von Hippel P. Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino-acid sequence data. Anal Biochem 1989; 182: 319–326.
- 38 Toyo'oka T,Imai K. New fluorogenic reagent having halogenobenzofurazan structure for thiols: 4-(aminosulfonyl)-7-fluoro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole. Anal Chem 1984; 56: 2461–2464.
- 39 Bulaj G,Kortemme T,Goldenberg D. Ionization-reactivity relationships for cysteine thiols in polypeptides. Biochemistry 1998; 37: 8965–8972.
- 40 Ellman G. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch Biochem Biophys 1959; 82: 70–77.
- 41 Dattelbaum JD,Looger LL,Benson DE,Sali KM,Thompson RB,Hellinga HW. Analysis of allosteric signal transduction mechanisms in an engineered fluorescent maltose biosensor. Protein Sci 2005; 14: 284–291.
- 42 de Lorimier RM,Smith JJ,Dwyer MA,Looger LL,Sali KM,Paavola CD,Rizk SS,Sadigov S,Conrad DW,Loew L,Hellinga HW. Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family. Protein Sci 2002; 11: 2655–2675.
- 43 Gross A,Columbus L,Hideg K,Altenbach C,Hubbell W. Structure of the KcsA potassium channel from Streptomyces lividans: a site-directed spin labeling study of the second transmembrane segment. Biochemistry 1999; 38: 10324–10335.
- 44 Shuck K,Lamb RA,Pinto LH. Analysis of the pore structure of the influenza A virus M(2) ion channel by the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. J Virol 2000; 74: 7755–7761.
- 45 Feng Z,Butler M,Alam S,Loh S. On the nature of conformational openings: native and unfolded-state hydrogen and thiol-disulfide exchange studies of ferric aquomyoglobin. J Mol Biol 2001; 314: 153–166.
- 46 Silverman JA,Harbury PB. Rapid mapping of protein structure, interactions, and ligand binding by misincorporation proton-alkyl exchange. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 30968–30975.
- 47 Silverman JA,Harbury PB. The equilibrium unfolding pathway of a (beta/alpha)8 barrel. J Mol Biol 2002; 324: 1031–1040.
- 48 Ha J,Loh S. Changes in side chain packing during apomyoglobin folding characterized by pulsed thiol-disulfide exchange. Nature Struct Biol 1998; 5: 730–737.
- 49 Sridevi K,Udgaonkar JB. Unfolding rates of barstar determined in native and low denaturant conditions indicate the presence of intermediates. Biochemistry 2002; 41: 1568–1578.
- 50 Jha SK,Udgaonkar JB. Exploring the cooperativity of the fast folding reaction of a small protein using pulsed thiol labeling and mass spectrometry. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 37479–37491.
- 51 Ramachandran S,Rami BR,Udgaonkar JB. Measurements of cysteine reactivity during protein unfolding suggest the presence of competing pathways. J Mol Biol 2000; 297: 733–745.
- 52 Hvidt A,Nielsen SO. Hydrogen exchange in proteins. Adv Protein Chem 1966; 21: 287–386.
- 53 Krishna MMG,Hoang L,Lin Y,Englander SW. Hydrogen exchange methods to study protein folding. Methods 2004; 34: 51–64.
- 54 Itzhaki LS,Neira JL,Fersht AR. Hydrogen exchange in chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 probed by denaturants and temperature. J Mol Biol 1997; 270: 89–98.
- 55 Neira JL,Mateu MG. Hydrogen exchange of the tetramerization domain of the human tumour suppressor p53 probed by denaturants and temperature. Eur J Biochem 2001; 268: 4868–4877.
- 56 Schutz C,Warshel A. What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2001; 44: 400–417.
- 57 Fitzkee NC,García-Moreno EB. Electrostatic effects in unfolded staphylococcal nuclease. Protein Sci 2008; 17: 216–227.
- 58 Kuhlman B,Luisi DL,Young P,Raleigh DP. pKa values and the pH dependent stability of the N-terminal domain of L9 as probes of electrostatic interactions in the denatured state. Differentiation between local and nonlocal interactions. Biochemistry 1999; 38: 4896–4903.
- 59 Chaires J. Possible origin of differences between van't Hoff and calorimetric enthalpy estimates. Biophys Chem 1997; 64: 15–23.
- 60 Prabhu NV,Sharp KA. Heat capacity in proteins. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2005; 56: 521–548.
- 61 Myers J,Pace N,Scholtz J. Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding. Protein Sci 1995; 4: 2138–2148.
- 62 Gomez J,Hilser V,Xie D,Freire E. The heat-capacity of proteins. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1995; 22: 404–412.
- 63 Razvi A,Scholtz JM. Lessons in stability from thermophilic proteins. Protein Sci 2006; 15: 1569–1578.
- 64 Rees D,Robertson A. Some thermodynamic implications for the thermostability of proteins. Protein Sci 2001; 10: 1187–1194.
- 65 Maxwell KL,Wildes D,Zarrine-Afsar A,De Los Rios MA,Brown AG,Friel CT,Hedberg L,Horng J-C,Bona D,Miller EJ,Vallée-Bélisle A,Main ERG,Bemporad F,Qiu L,Teilum K,Vu N-D,Edwards AM,Ruczinski I,Poulsen FM,Kragelund BB,Michnick SW,Chiti F,Bai Y,Hagen SJ,Serrano L,Oliveberg M,Raleigh DP,Wittung-Stafshede P,Radford SE,Jackson SE,Sosnick TR,Marqusee S,Davidson AR,Plaxco KW. Protein folding: defining a “standard” set of experimental conditions and a preliminary kinetic data set of two-state proteins. Protein Sci 2005; 14: 602–616.
- 66 Chen X,Zhou Y,Peng X,Yoon J. Fluorescent and colorimetric probes for detection of thiols. Chem Soc Rev 2010; 39: 2120–2135.
- 67 Toyo'oka T,Imai K. Isolation and characterization of cysteine-containing regions of proteins using 4-(aminosulfonyl)-7-fluoro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole and high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Chem 1985; 57: 1931–1937.
- 68 Englander SW,Mayne L,Bai Y,Sosnick TR. Hydrogen exchange: the modern legacy of Linderstrøm-Lang. Protein Sci 1997; 6: 1101–1109.