Creativity and Perception: Unveiling the Role of Cross-Modal Audiovisual Integration
Xinyao Xiao
Chongqing University
Chinese Institute of Music and Mental Health
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jian Wang
Golden Sword Primary School
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jian Wang, Golden Sword Primary School, Bishan District, Chongqing 402760, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXinyao Xiao
Chongqing University
Chinese Institute of Music and Mental Health
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jian Wang
Golden Sword Primary School
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jian Wang, Golden Sword Primary School, Bishan District, Chongqing 402760, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorWe want to thank Tan Jinpei, Jiang Yihe, and Liu Xiaolin for their insights and feedback during the development of this study. Parts of this study present at the Chinese Psychological Society's special committee on music psychology.
ABSTRACT
Multisensory environments rich in modal integration provide cues from various sensory modalities including visually, auditorily, and tactilely. Such modal integration plays a crucial role in cognitive processing, specifically in fostering creativity. Numerous studies highlight that emotional coherence through cross-modal affective integration enhances cognitive competencies such as memory, attention, and the capacity to generate original, fluent ideas. Nonetheless, current research lacks comparative studies pinpointing how different sensory modalities impact individual creativity. We addressed this research void by employing a cross-model matching paradigm, anchored on the concept of emotional coherence. Our investigation evaluated the impact of varying emotional stimuli (both positive and negative) on creativity performance, considering single sensory modalities (visual and auditory), as well as their cross. Our study participants were 119 Chinese university students who completed a creative task under varying emotional stimulation modality conditions. We observed that the bimodal audiovisual integration of positive emotional stimuli most effectively enhanced creativity as compared to solely auditory modality. The visual modality seemed the least effective, underscoring the impact of multichannel integration. Interestingly, the bimodal audiovisual integration of negative emotional stimuli significantly boosted originality, albeit with little difference in fluency relative to the auditory modality. Based on the theoretical significance of multimodal emotional integration, our interpretation of these findings suggests that audiovisual cross-modal emotional integration, with its rich emotional information, serves as a catalyst for enhancing originality. However, we observed that the facilitative effect on overall creativity and fluency is primarily observed in the context of positive emotions. It is important to note that we carefully controlled for participants' creative personality factors and conducted three types of emotional evaluations across modalities to ensure the validity of our results. Furthermore, the impact of cross-modal audiovisual emotional integration on creativity, both in terms of originality and fluency, is influenced by the distinct emotional perceptual characteristics inherent to each modality.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that the research was conducted without commercial or financial relationships that could be a potential conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.
REFERENCES
- Abele-Brehm, A. (1992). Positive versus negative mood influences on problem solving: A review. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 23, 187–202.
- Akinola, M., & Mendes, W.B. (2008). The dark side of creativity: Biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1677–1686.
- Altenmüller, E., Ioannou, C.I., Raab, M., & Lobinger, B. (2014). Apollo's curse: Causes and cures of motor failures in musicians: A proposal for a new classification. Paper presented at the Progress in Motor Control: Skill Learning, Performance, Health, and Injury.
- Amabile, T.M., Barsade, S.G., Mueller, J.S., & Staw, B.M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.
- Andonova, V., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., Jimenez Ramirez, M.A., & Carrasquilla, D. (2023). Does multisensory stimulation with virtual reality (VR) and smell improve learning? An educational experience in recall and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1176697.
- Baas, M., De Dreu, C.K., & Nijstad, B.A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779.
- Beaty, R.E., Kenett, Y.N., Christensen, A.P., Rosenberg, M.D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., … & Kane, M.J. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 1087–1092.
- Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133.
- Blood, A.J., & Zatorre, R.J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 11818–11823.
- Blurton, S.P., Greenlee, M.W., & Gondan, M. (2014). Multisensory processing of redundant information in go/no-go and choice responses. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1212–1233.
- Boden, M.A. (2007). Creativity in a nutshell. Think, 5, 83–96.
10.1017/S147717560000230X Google Scholar
- Bolte, A., Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Emotion and intuition: Effects of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic coherence. Psychological Science, 14, 416–421.
- Borgan, F., O'Daly, O., Veronese, M., Reis Marques, T., Laurikainen, H., Hietala, J., & Howes, O. (2021). The neural and molecular basis of working memory function in psychosis: A multimodal PET-fMRI study. Molecular Psychiatry, 26, 4464–4474.
- Botta, F., Santangelo, V., Raffone, A., Sanabria, D., Lupiáñez, J., & Belardinelli, M.O. (2011). Multisensory integration affects visuo-spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1099.
- Bradley, M.M., & Lang, P.J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59.
- Burdea, G.C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.1002/9780471723752 Google Scholar
- Callaghan, K.T., & Growney, C.M. (2013). The impact of music and mood on creative thinking. International Journal of Psychological Research, 18; doi: 10.24839/2164-8204.JN18.4.164.
10.24839/2164-8204.JN18.4.164 Google Scholar
- Choi, Y.Y., Shamosh, N.A., Cho, S.H., DeYoung, C.G., Lee, M.J., Lee, J.-M., … & Gray, J.R. (2008). Multiple bases of human intelligence revealed by cortical thickness and neural activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10323–10329.
- Christensen, P.R., Guilford, J.P., & Wilson, R.C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 82.
- Classen, C. (2012). The deepest sense: A cultural history of touch. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
10.5406/illinois/9780252034930.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Conway, A.M., Tugade, M.M., Catalino, L.I., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function and mechanisms. In S.A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 17–34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Day, R.-F., Lin, C.-H., Huang, W.-H., & Chuang, S.-H. (2009). Effects of music tempo and task difficulty on multi-attribute decision-making: An eye-tracking approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 130–143.
- de Aldecoa, P.I., Burdett, E., & Gustafsson, E. (2022). Riding the elephant in the room: Towards a revival of the optimal level of stimulation model. Developmental Review, 66, 101051.
10.1016/j.dr.2022.101051 Google Scholar
- De Dreu, C.K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B.A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739.
- Diaconescu, A.O., Alain, C., & McIntosh, A.R. (2011). The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 2896–2909.
- Diaconescu, A.O., Hasher, L., & McIntosh, A.R. (2013). Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age. NeuroImage, 65, 152–166.
- Doi, H., & Shinohara, K. (2015). Unconscious presentation of fearful face modulates electrophysiological responses to emotional prosody. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 817–832.
- Driver, J., & Noesselt, T. (2008). Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on ‘sensory-specific’ brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron, 57, 11–23.
- Dugosh, K.L., & Paulus, P.B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 313–320.
- Duncan, J., Martens, S., & Ward, R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities. Nature, 387, 808–810.
- Duncum, P. (2012). An eye does not make an I: Expanding the sensorium. Studies in Art Education, 53, 182–193.
10.1080/00393541.2012.11518862 Google Scholar
- Evans, K.K., & Treisman, A. (2010). Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of Vision, 10, 6.
- Feldman, Y., Arno, M., Carrano, C., Ng, B., & Chen, B. (2018). Toward a multimodal-deep learning retrieval system for monitoring nuclear proliferation activities. Journal of Nuclear Materials Management, 46, 68–80.
- Fernández-Abascal, E.G., & Díaz, M.D.M. (2013). Affective induction and creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 213–221.
- Fink, A., Grabner, R.H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M., … & Neubauer, A.C. (2009). The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 734–748.
- Fink, A., Grabner, R.H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 52, 1687–1695.
- Fink, A., & Neubauer, A.C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 46–53.
- Fong, E., Lyddon, S., & Holmes, C. (2019). Scalable nonparametric sampling from multimodal posteriors with the posterior bootstrap. Paper presented at the International Conference on Machine Learning.
- Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218.
- Fredrickson, B.L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations.
- Fredrickson, B.L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1367–1377.
- Fredrickson, B.L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332.
- Frith, E., Kane, M.J., Welhaf, M.S., Christensen, A.P., Silvia, P.J., & Beaty, R.E. (2021). Keeping creativity under control: Contributions of attention control and fluid intelligence to divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 33, 138–157.
- Fritz, T., Jentschke, S., Gosselin, N., Sammler, D., Peretz, I., Turner, R., … & Koelsch, S. (2009). Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music. Current Biology, 19, 573–576.
- Gentile, F., van Atteveldt, N., De Martino, F., & Goebel, R. (2017). Approaching the ground truth: Revealing the functional organization of human multisensory STC using ultra-high field fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 10104–10113.
- Gruzelier, J.H. (2014). EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. II: Creativity, the performing arts and ecological validity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 142–158.
- Guilford, J.P. (1966). Measurement and creativity. Theory Into Practice, 5, 185–189.
10.1080/00405846609542023 Google Scholar
- Guilford, J.P. (1967a). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 3–14.
- Guilford, J.P. (1967b). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Gustafsson, E. (2023). How can contextual variables influence creative thinking? Contributions from the optimal-level of arousal model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57, 96–108.
- Haijuan, Y., Yajing, C., & Yunping, Z. (2018). The effect of emotional state and background music on the creative thinking. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 243–249.
- Hanson, K., & Shelton, B.E. (2008). Design and development of virtual reality: Analysis of challenges faced by educators. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 118–131.
- He, W.-j. (2023). Positive and negative affect facilitate creativity motivation: Findings on the effects of habitual mood and experimentally induced emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1014612.
- Hennessey, B.A. (2015). Creative behavior, motivation, environment and culture: The building of a systems model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 194–210.
- Hunter, B., Wolfermann, A., & Boltze, M. (2011). Multimodal assessment of signalized intersections considering the number of travellers. Paper presented at the TRB Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.
- Huron, D., & Vuoskoski, J.K. (2020). On the enjoyment of sad music: Pleasurable compassion theory and the role of trait empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 499421.
- Janata, P. (2009). The neural architecture of music-evoked autobiographical memories. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2579–2594.
- Juslin, P.N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10, 235–266.
- Kuling, I.A., Kohlrausch, A., & Juola, J.F. (2013). Quantifying temporal ventriloquism in audiovisual synchrony perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1583–1599.
- Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.
- Lau, K.W., & Lee, P.Y. (2015). The use of virtual reality for creating unusual environmental stimulation to motivate students to explore creative ideas. Interactive Learning Environments, 23, 3–18.
- Li, Y., Tao, J., Schuller, B., Shan, S., Jiang, D., & Jia, J. (2016). MEC 2016: The multimodal emotion recognition challenge of CCPR 2016. Paper presented at the Pattern Recognition: 7th Chinese Conference, CCPR 2016, Chengdu, China, November 5–7, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 7.
- Li, Y., Xiao, X., Ma, W., Jiang, J., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for emotional valence and competitive arousal effects on insight problem solving. Brain Research, 1538, 61–72.
- Liu, X., Liu, Y., Shi, H., & Zheng, M. (2021). Effects of mindfulness meditation on musical aesthetic emotion processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648062.
- Livingstone, S.R., & Russo, F.A. (2018). The Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS): A dynamic, multimodal set of facial and vocal expressions in North American English. PLoS One, 13, e0196391.
- Lloyd-Cox, J., Chen, Q., & Beaty, R.E. (2022). The time course of creativity: Multivariate classification of default and executive network contributions to creative cognition over time. Cortex, 156, 90–105.
- Lu, B., Hui, M., & Yu-Xia, H. (2005). The development of native Chinese affective picture system—A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19, 719–722.
- Lugo, J., Doti, R., Wittich, W., & Faubert, J. (2008). Multisensory integration: Central processing modifies peripheral systems. Psychological Science, 19, 989–997.
- Luo, X., Kang, G., Guo, Y., Yu, X., & Zhou, X. (2020). A value-driven McGurk effect: Value-associated faces enhance the influence of visual information on audiovisual speech perception and its eye movement pattern. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 1928–1941.
- Mazza, V., Turatto, M., Rossi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2007). How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention? Neuropsychologia, 45, 514–522.
- McDonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., & Ward, L.M. (2001). Multisensory integration and crossmodal attention effects in the human brain. Science, 292, 1791.
- Merter, S. (2017). Synesthetic approach in the design process for enhanced creativity and multisensory experiences. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4519–S4528.
10.1080/14606925.2017.1352948 Google Scholar
- Miron-Spektor, E., Efrat-Treister, D., Rafaeli, A., & Schwarz-Cohen, O. (2011). Others' anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1065.
- Misselhorn, J., Friese, U., & Engel, A.K. (2019). Frontal and parietal alpha oscillations reflect attentional modulation of cross-modal matching. Scientific Reports, 9, 5030.
- Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Murray, M.M., Javitt, D.C., Schroeder, C.E., & Foxe, J.J. (2002). Multisensory auditory–visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: A high-density electrical mapping study. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 115–128.
- Mungan, E. (2023). Gestalt theory: A revolution put on pause? Prospects for a paradigm shift in the psychological sciences. New Ideas in Psychology, 71, 101036.
- Newell, A., & Card, S.K. (1985). The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 209–242.
10.1207/s15327051hci0103_1 Google Scholar
- Newton, D.P. (2013). Moods, emotions and creative thinking: A framework for teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 34–44.
- Paulus, P.B., & Nijstad, B.A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J.B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, 17.
- Pessoa, L., Lindquist, K.A., Wager, T.D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L.F. (2012). Beyond brain regions: Network perspective of cognition–emotion interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 158.
- Petrini, K., Crabbe, F., Sheridan, C., & Pollick, F.E. (2011). The music of your emotions: Neural substrates involved in detection of emotional correspondence between auditory and visual music actions. PLoS One, 6, e19165.
- Radocy, R.E., & Boyle, J.D. (2012). Psychological foundations of musical behavior. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
- Ripp, I., zur Nieden, A.N., Blankenagel, S., Franzmeier, N., Lundström, J.N., & Freiherr, J. (2018). Multisensory integration processing during olfactory-visual stimulation—An fMRI graph theoretical network analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 3713–3727.
- Ritter, S.M., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PLoS One, 12, e0182210.
- Rowe, G., Hirsh, J.B., & Anderson, A.K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 383–388.
- Russ, S.W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. London: Psychology Press.
- Sachs, M.E., Damasio, A., & Habibi, A. (2015). The pleasures of sad music: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 404; doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00404.
- Schmidhuber, J. (2010). Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990–2010). IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 2, 230–247.
10.1109/TAMD.2010.2056368 Google Scholar
- Schmidt, S. (2019). In the making: Open Creative Labs as an emerging topic in economic geography? Geography Compass, 13, e12463.
- Schmidt, S.R., & Saari, B. (2007). The emotional memory effect: Differential processing or item distinctiveness? Memory and Cognition, 35, 1905–1916.
- Shams, L., & Seitz, A.R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 411–417.
- Silvia, P.J., Fayn, K., Nusbaum, E.C., & Beaty, R.E. (2015). Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 376.
- Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677.
- Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Stock, A.-K., Gohil, K., Huster, R.J., & Beste, C. (2017). On the effects of multimodal information integration in multitasking. Scientific Reports, 7, 4927.
- Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M.G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400–410.
- Tellinghuisen, D.J., & Nowak, E.J. (2003). The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 817–828.
- Thompson, W.F., Schellenberg, E.G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12, 248–251.
- To, M.L., Fisher, C.D., Ashkanasy, N.M., & Rowe, P.A. (2012). Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 599.
- Torrance, E.P., Gowan, J.C., Wu, J.-J., & Aliotti, N.C. (1970). Creative functioning of monolingual and bilingual children in Singapore. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 72.
- Torrance, E.P., & Presbury, J. (1984). The criteria of success used in 242 recent experimental studies of creativity. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 9, 238–242.
- Trehub, S.E., & Hannon, E.E. (2006). Infant music perception: Domain-general or domain-specific mechanisms? Cognition, 100, 73–99.
- Twomey, D.R.F., Burns, E., & Morris, S. (1998). Personality, creativity, and aesthetic preference: Comparing psychoticism, sensation seeking, schizotypy, and openness to experience. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 153–178.
10.2190/8GVJ-ERL3-HYUM-EH88 Google Scholar
- Van der Burg, E., Olivers, C.N., Bronkhorst, A.W., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Audiovisual events capture attention: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Journal of Vision, 8, 2.
- Vergara, D., Extremera, J., Rubio, M.P., & Dávila, L.P. (2019). Meaningful learning through virtual reality learning environments: A case study in materials engineering. Applied Sciences, 9, 4625.
10.3390/app9214625 Google Scholar
- Vogler, J.N., & Titchener, K. (2011). Cross-modal conflicts in object recognition: Determining the influence of object category. Experimental Brain Research, 214, 597–605.
- Vosburg, S., & Kaufmann, G. (1999). What is meant by “creativity”? In S.W. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience, and psychological adjustment (p. 19). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
- Vuoskoski, J.K., & Eerola, T. (2012). Can sad music really make you sad? Indirect measures of affective states induced by music and autobiographical memories. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 204.
- Vuoskoski, J.K., Gatti, E., Spence, C., & Clarke, E.F. (2016). Do visual cues intensify the emotional responses evoked by musical performance? A psychophysiological investigation. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 26, 179.
10.1037/pmu0000142 Google Scholar
- Weller, M. (2007). Virtual learning environments: Using, choosing and developing your VLE. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203964347 Google Scholar
- Williams, F.E. (1979). Assessing creativity across Williams “cube” model. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 23, 748–756.
- Wilson, R.C., Guilford, J.P., & Christensen, P.R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 362.
- Wolf, T., Goupil, L., & Canonne, C. (2023). Beyond togetherness: Interactional dissensus fosters creativity and tension in freely improvised musical duos. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi: 10.1037/aca0000588
- Xiao, X., Tan, J., Liu, X., & Zheng, M. (2023). The dual effect of background music on creativity: Perspectives of music preference and cognitive interference. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1247133.
- Zhou, X., Wu, Y., Zheng, Y., Xiao, Z., & Zheng, M. (2022). The mechanism and neural substrate of musical emotions in the audio-visual modality. Psychology of Music, 50, 779–796.
- Zinchenko, Y., Khoroshikh, P., Sergievich, A., Smirnov, A., Tumyalis, A., Kovalev, A., & Golokhvast, K. (2020). Virtual reality is more efficient in learning human heart anatomy especially for subjects with low baseline knowledge. New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100786.