Volume 50, Issue 7 pp. 974-975

COMMENTARY

Can we improve the diagnosis of fetal macrosomia?

Giuseppe Rizzo MD,

Corresponding Author

Giuseppe Rizzo MD

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-4353

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Correspondence

Giuseppe Rizzo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Lodovico Patrizi,

Lodovico Patrizi

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Ilenia Mappa MD,PhD,

Ilenia Mappa MD,PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Giuseppe Rizzo MD,

Corresponding Author

Giuseppe Rizzo MD

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0002-5525-4353

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Correspondence

Giuseppe Rizzo, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Lodovico Patrizi,

Lodovico Patrizi

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Ilenia Mappa MD,PhD,

Ilenia Mappa MD,PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 07 September 2022

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23238

Share a link

Email
Wechat
Bluesky

No abstract is available for this article.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All Authors report no conflicts of interest.

Open Research

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

REFERENCES

1Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 134-145.
10.1080/00016340801899289
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2Beta J, Khan N, Khalil A, Fiolna M, Ramadan G, Akolekar R. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 54(3): 308-318.
10.1002/uog.20279
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3Plagemann A, Harder T, Dudenhausen JW. Childhood obesity, other cardiovascular risk factors, and premature death. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362: 1840-1841.
10.1056/NEJMc1002801
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Song J, Liu J, Liu L, et al. The birth weight of macrosomia influence the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term. J Clin Ultrasound. 2022; 50(7): 967-973.
10.1002/jcu.23236
Web of Science® Google Scholar
5Dall'Asta A, Rizzo G, Kiener A, et al. Identification of large-for-gestational age fetuses using antenatal customized fetal growth charts: can we improve the prediction of abnormal labor course? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 248: 81-88.
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.024
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6Khan N, Ciobanu A, Karampitsakos T, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep; 54(3): 326-333.
10.1002/uog.20377
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Sirico A, Rizzo G, Maruotti GM, et al. Does fetal macrosomia affect umbilical artery Doppler velocity waveforms in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29(20): 3266-3270.
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8Maruotti GM, Rizzo G, Sirico A, et al. Are there any relationships between umbilical artery Pulsatility index and macrosomia in fetuses of type I diabetic mothers? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27(17): 1776-1781.
10.3109/14767058.2013.879706
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, Khizroeva J, Makatsarya A, D'Antonio F. The added value of umbilical vein flow in predicting fetal macrosomia at 36 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100(5): 900-907.
10.1111/aogs.14047
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10Lu J, Capponi A, Mappa I, Maneschi F, Rizzo G. Effects of gestational diabetes mellitus on ductus venosus shunting during the third trimester. Prenatal. Cardiology. 2021; 11(1):29-36. doi:10.5114/pcard.2021.112315
10.5114/pcard.2021.112315
Google Scholar
11Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, et al. Role of first-trimester umbilical vein blood flow in predicting large-for-gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 56(1): 67-72.
10.1002/uog.20408
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume50, Issue7

September 2022

Pages 974-975

Can we improve the diagnosis of fetal macrosomia?

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Open Research

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

REFERENCES

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Can we improve the diagnosis of fetal macrosomia?

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Open Research

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

REFERENCES

References

Related

Information