Volume 10, Issue 12 pp. 1714-1722
Full Article

Is the nuclear refractive index lower than cytoplasm? Validation of phase measurements and implications for light scattering technologies

Zachary A. Steelman

Zachary A. Steelman

Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 101 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708. USA

Search for more papers by this author
Will J. Eldridge

Will J. Eldridge

Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 101 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708. USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jacob B. Weintraub

Jacob B. Weintraub

Cornell University, Department of Physics, 109 Clark Hall, Ithaca, New York, 14853. USA

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Wax

Corresponding Author

Adam Wax

Duke University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 101 Science Drive, Durham, NC, 27708. USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 April 2017
Citations: 55

Abstract

The refractive index (RI) of biological materials is a fundamental parameter for the optical characterization of living systems. Numerous light scattering technologies are grounded in a quantitative knowledge of the refractive index at cellular and subcellular scales. Recent work in quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) has called into question the widely held assumption that the index of the cell nucleus is greater than that of the cytoplasm, a result which disagrees with much of the current literature. In this work, we critically examine the measurement of the nuclear and whole-cell refractive index using QPM, validating that nuclear refractive index is lower than that of cytoplasm in four diverse cell lines and their corresponding isolated nuclei. We further examine Mie scattering and phase-wrapping as potential sources of error in these measurements, finding they have minimal impact. Finally, we use simulation to examine the effects of incorrect RI assumptions on nuclear morphology measurements using angle-resolved scattering information. Despite an erroneous assumption of the nuclear refractive index, accurate measurement of nuclear morphology was maintained, suggesting that light scattering modalities remain effective.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.