Volume 32, Issue 1 e2379
EXPLORATORY REPORT

Who is a thinker? With age, higher SES American children increasingly associate social status with divisions in labour

Shaylene E. Nancekivell

Corresponding Author

Shaylene E. Nancekivell

Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

Correspondence

Shaylene E. Nancekivell, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Tatyana Farrow

Tatyana Farrow

Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
Brian A. Maurer

Brian A. Maurer

Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 October 2022
Citations: 1

Abstract

This exploratory report investigates how children, aged 6- to 12-years, reason about divisions in labour. It focuses on understanding when in development children might associate higher status groups with intellectual as opposed to physical labour. It explores this question by introducing a sample of mostly mid/high-SES American children to a novel factory setting and then asking them who is likely to have one of two jobs: a ‘builder’ (physical labour), or ‘thinker’ (intellectual labour) job. Older children were more likely than younger children to associate an individual's higher social status with intellectual labour work as opposed to physical labour work. Children also explained their reasoning, and with age their explanations focused more on social factors like the role of access to ‘choices’ or opportunities in shaping the nature of others' work.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The majority of the data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/5d9qy/?view_only=83c13d06da11442fb39e2e88106c7da1.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.