Greener process for syngas cogeneration: Bi-reforming of methane coupled with chemical looping combustion
Shadab Alam
Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, India
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sumana Chenna
Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, India
Correspondence
Sumana Chenna, Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorShadab Alam
Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, India
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sumana Chenna
Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad, India
Correspondence
Sumana Chenna, Department of Process Engineering and Technology Transfer, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, Grant/Award Number: 341700/2K19/1
Summary
A greener, self-sustainable and integrated process has been proposed in this paper to produce syngas through chemical looping combustion (CLC) coupled bi-reforming of methane (BRM) with CO2 for the first time. The proposed process scheme is advantageous in several folds, that is, it consumes two major greenhouse gases, overcomes the drawback of catalyst deactivation caused by coke formation and it can produce syngas gas with an H2/CO molar ratio of 2 as required for methanol synthesis processes. Further, integration of BRM with CLC, helps to fulfil the endothermic heat demand and CO2 feed requirement of BRM. Further, the process is made self-sustainable with the incorporation of heat recovery and steam generation and power generation sections. Steady-state plant-wide models have been developed for the proposed integrated CLC-BRM process using ASPEN Plus software and detailed thermodynamic analysis has been performed. Rigorous sensitivity analysis has resulted in 98.2% CH4 conversion, H2 and CO yields of 93.6%, 93.9% respectively with a syngas ratio of ≈ 2 at the bi-reformer conditions of 850°C and 1 atm. The optimal steam and CO2 input flowrates for bi-reforming of 1 kmol/hour CH4 are found to be 0.8 and 0.4 kmol/h respectively, which are fulfilled by CLC integration. The performance of the proposed scheme is further compared with a conventional bi-reforming process that uses a combustor for energy supply. The results demonstrate the feasibility and potential pay-offs of the CLC-BRM scheme in terms of increased energy efficacy and eco-friendliness.
REFERENCES
- 1Spath PL, Dayton DC. Preliminary screening—technical and economic assessment of synthesis gas to fuels and chemicals with emphasis on the potential for biomass-derived syngas. Natl Renew Energy Lab. 2003; 1-160. doi:10.2172/15006100
- 2Cao Y, Gao Z, Jin J, et al. Synthesis gas production with an adjustable H2/CO ratio through the coal gasification process: effects of coal ranks and methane addition. Energy Fuels. 2008; 22: 1720-1730.
- 3Hegarty MES, O'Connor AM, Ross JRH. Syngas production from natural gas using ZrO2-supported metals. Catal Today. 1998; 42: 225-232.
- 4Siang TJ, Pham TLM, Cuong NV, et al. Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane for syngas production over carbon-resistant boron-promoted Ni/SBA-15 catalysts. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2018; 262: 122-132.
- 5Chun YN, Song HO. Syngas production from propane using gliding arc plasma reforming. Environ Eng Sci. 2006; 23: 1017-1023.
- 6Ouni F, Khacef A, Cormier JM. Syngas production from propane using atmospheric non-thermal plasma. Plasma Chem Plasma Process. 2009; 29: 119-130.
- 7Galvita VV, Semin GL, Belyaev VD, Semikolenov VA, Tsiakaras P, Sobyanin VA. Synthesis gas production by steam reforming of ethanol. Appl Catal Gen. 2001; 220: 123-127.
- 8Zhao S, Cai W, Li Y, Yu H, Zhang S, Cui L. Syngas production from ethanol dry reforming over Rh/CeO2 catalyst. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2018; 22: 58-65.
- 9Gonzalez H, Caro S, Toledo M, Olguin H. Syngas production from polyethylene and biogas in porous media combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018; 43: 4294-4304.
- 10Saad JM, Nahil MA, Wu C, Williams PT. Influence of nickel-based catalysts on syngas production from carbon dioxide reforming of waste high density polyethylene. Fuel Process Technol. 2015; 138: 156-163.
- 11Liu L, Wang Q, Ahmad S, Yang X, Ji M, Sun Y. Steam reforming of toluene as model biomass tar to H2-rich syngas in a DBD plasma-catalytic system. J Energy Institut. 2018; 91: 927-939.
- 12Oh G, Park SY, Seo MW, et al. Combined steam-dry reforming of toluene in syngas over CaNiRu/Al2O3 catalysts. Int J Green Energy. 2019; 16: 333-349.
- 13Badr O, Probert SD, O'Callaghan PW. Atmospheric methane: its contribution to global warming. Appl Energy. 1991; 40: 273-313.
- 14Özkara-Aydnolu Ş. Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined carbon dioxide reforming with steam reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35: 12821-12828.
- 15Medrano-García JD, Ruiz-Femenia R. Multi-objective optimization of a carbon dioxide utilization superstructure for the synthesis of formic and acetic acid. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. 2018: 43: 1419-1424.
- 16Koh ACW, Chen L, Kee Leong W, Johnson BFG, Khimyak T, Lin J. Hydrogen or synthesis gas production via the partial oxidation of methane over supported nickel-cobalt catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007; 32: 725-730.
- 17Zhang Q, Wang J, Ning P, et al. Dry reforming of methane over Ni/SBA-15 catalysts prepared by homogeneous precipitation method. Korean J Chem Eng. 2017; 34: 2823-2831.
- 18Taherian Z, Yousefpour M, Tajally M, Khoshandam B. Catalytic performance of Samaria-promoted Ni and Co/SBA-15 catalysts for dry reforming of methane. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017; 42: 24811-24822.
- 19Salhi N, Boulahouache A, Petit C, Kiennemann A, Rabia C. Steam reforming of methane to syngas over NiAl2O4 spinel catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36: 11433-11439.
- 20Yang E h, Noh YS, Hong GH, Moon DJ. Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane over La1-xSrxNiO3 perovskite oxides. Catal Today. 2018; 299: 242-250.
- 21Gao N, Cheng M, Quan C, Zheng Y. Syngas production via combined dry and steam reforming of methane over Ni-Ce/ZSM-5 catalyst. Fuel. 2020; 273: 117702.
- 22Dan M, Mihet M, Lazar MD. Hydrogen and/or syngas production by combined steam and dry reforming of methane on nickel catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45: 26254-26264.
- 23Batebi D, Abedini R, Mosayebi A. Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane (CSCRM) over Ni–Pd/Al2O3 catalyst for syngas formation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45: 14293-14310.
- 24Soria MA, Mateos-Pedrero C, Guerrero-Ruiz A, Rodríguez-Ramos I. Thermodynamic and experimental study of combined dry and steam reforming of methane on Ru/ZrO2-La2O3 catalyst at low temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36: 15212-15220.
- 25de Lima KPM, Dias V d F, Silva JD d. Numerical modelling for the solar driven bi-reforming of methane for the production of syngas in a solar thermochemical micro-packed bed reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45: 10353-10369.
- 26le Sache E, Pastor-Pérez L, Garcilaso V, et al. Flexible syngas production using a La2Zr2-xNixO7-delta pyrochlore-double perovskite catalyst: towards a direct route for gas phase CO2 recycling. Catal TODAY. 2020; 357: 583-589.
- 27Mallikarjun G, Sagar TV, Swapna S, Raju N, Chandrashekar P, Lingaiah N. Hydrogen rich syngas production by bi-reforming of methane with CO(2)over Ni supported on CeO2-SrO mixed oxide catalysts. Catal TODAY. 2020; 356: 597-603.
- 28Nguyen HM, Pham GH, Tade M, Phan C, Vagnoni R, Liu S. Microwave-assisted dry and bi-reforming of methane over M-Mo/TiO2(M = co, cu) bimetallic catalysts. Energy Fuels. 2020; 34: 7284-7294.
- 29Cunha AF, Morales-Torres S, Pastrana-Martínez LM, et al. Syngas production by bi-reforming methane on an Ni-K-promoted catalyst using hydrotalcites and filamentous carbon as a support material. RSC Adv. 2020; 10: 21158-21173.
- 30Cunha AF, Mata TM, Caetano NS, Martins AA, Loureiro JM. Catalytic bi-reforming of methane for carbon dioxide ennoblement. Energy Rep. 2020; 6: 74-79.
- 31Karemore AL, Sinha R, Chugh P, Vaidya PD. Mixed reforming of methane over Ni-K/CeO2-Al2O3: study of catalyst performance and reaction kinetics. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46: 5223-5233.
- 32Wysocka I, Mielewczyk-Gryń A, Łapiński M, Cieślik B, Rogala A. Effect of small quantities of potassium promoter and steam on the catalytic properties of nickel catalysts in dry/combined methane reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46: 3847-3864.
- 33Dharmasaroja N, Ratana T, Tungkamani S, Sornchamni T, Simakov DSA, Phongaksorn M. The effects of CeO2 and co doping on the properties and the performance of the Ni/Al2O3-MgO catalyst for the combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane using ultra-low steam to carbon ratio. Catalysts. 2020; 10: 1–13.
- 34Jang WJ, Jeong DW, Shim JO, et al. Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application. Appl Energy. 2016; 173: 80-91.
- 35Yu S, Hu Y, Cui H, Cheng Z, Zhou Z. Ni-based catalysts supported on MgAl2O4 with different properties for combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane. Chem Eng Sci. 2021; 232: 116379.
- 36Figueroa JD, Fout T, Plasynski S, McIlvried H, Srivastava RD. Advances in CO2 capture technology—the U.S. Department of Energy's carbon sequestration program. Int J Greenh Gas Control. 2008; 2: 9-20.
- 37Alam S, Kumar JP, Rani KY, Sumana C. Self-sustained process scheme for high purity hydrogen production using sorption enhanced steam methane reforming coupled with chemical looping combustion. J Clean Prod. 2017; 162: 687-701.
- 38Abbasi M, Farniaei M, Rahimpour MR, Shariati A. Simultaneous syngas production with different H2/CO ratio in a multi-tubular methane steam and dry reformer by utilizing of CLC. J Energy Chem. 2015; 24: 54-64.
- 39Rahimpour MR, Hesami M, Saidi M, Jahanmiri A, Farniaei M, Abbasi M. Methane steam reforming thermally coupled with fuel combustion: application of chemical looping concept as a novel technology. Energy Fuels. 2013; 27: 2351-2362.
- 40Rydén M, Lyngfelt A, Mattisson T. Two Novel Approaches for Hydrogen Production; Chemical-Looping Reforming and Steam Reforming with Carbon Dioxide Capture by Chemical-Looping Combustion, Vol. 16. World Hydrogen Energy Conference; 2006.
- 41Alam S, Kumar JP, Rani KY, Sumana C. Comparative assessment of performances of different oxygen carriers in a chemical looping combustion coupled intensified reforming process through simulation study. J Clean Prod. 2020; 262: 121146.
- 42Ruthwik N, Kavya D, Shadab A, Lingaiah N, Sumana C. Thermodynamic analysis of chemical looping combustion integrated oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene with CO2. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2020; 153(107959): 107959.
- 43Alam S, Sumana C. Thermodynamic analysis of plant-wide CLC-SESMR scheme for H2 production: studying the effect of oxygen carrier supports. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44: 3250-3263.
- 44Desideri U, Paolucci A. Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energy Convers Manag. 1999; 40: 1899-1915.