Enhancement of the Quantum Coherence of the Rydberg Atoms System by Weak Measurement
Qi Chen
Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics and Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jing-Bo Xu
Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics and Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 P. R. China
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorQi Chen
Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics and Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jing-Bo Xu
Zhejiang Institute of Modern Physics and Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027 P. R. China
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The influence of weak measurement along with quantum measurement reversal on the Rydberg atoms system is investigated, and is found to have an important practical significance as both weak measurement along with quantum measurement reversal and Rydberg atoms system can be experimentally realized. The quantum coherence and the entropic uncertainty relation of the system are explored, and it is found that the quantum coherence of the system is enhanced and the values of uncertainty and the uncertainty bound are reduced under some particular weak measurements along with quantum measurement reversals. This indicates that the decoherence effect of the system can be weakened by weak measurement along with quantum measurement reversal. Furthermore, the trace distance which is a reflection of the entanglement is also examined, and it is shown that weak measurement along with quantum measurement reversal can improve the entanglement of the system.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1S. Maniscalco, F. Francica, R. L. Zaffino, N. Lo Gullo, F. Plastina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 090503.
- 2A. M. Steane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 793.
- 3D. A. Lidar, I. L. Chuang, K. B. Whaley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 2594.
- 4L. Viola, E. Knill, S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2417.
- 5S. C. Hou, X. L. Huang, X. X. Yi, Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82, 012336.
- 6A. N. Korotkov, K. Keane, Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81, 040103.
- 7N. Katz, M. Neeley, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, M. Hofheinz, E. Lucero, A. O'Connell, H. Wang, A. N. Cleland, J. M. Martinis, A. N. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 200401.
- 8Y.-J. Zhang, W. Han, H. Fan, Y.-J. Xia, Ann. Phys. 2015, 354, 203.
- 9A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Jordan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 166805.
- 10M. Koashi, M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2598.
- 11Y.-S. Kim, J.-C. Lee, O. Kwon, Y.-H. Kim, Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 117.
- 12M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, K. Mølmer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 2313.
- 13T. E. Lee, H. Häffner, M. C. Cross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 023602.
- 14R. M. W. van Bijnen, T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 243002.
- 15H. Weimer, M. Müller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, H. P. Büchler, Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 382.
- 16Y. O. Dudin, A. Kuzmich, Science 2012, 336, 887.
- 17J. D. Pritchard, D. Maxwell, A. Gauguet, K. J. Weatherill, M. P. A. Jones, C. S. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 193603.
- 18O. Firstenberg, T. Peyronel, Q.-Y. Liang, A. V. Gorshkov, M. D. Lukin, V. Vuletić, Nature 2013, 502, 71.
- 19H. Levine, A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 123603.
- 20S. Sachdev, in Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials (Eds: H. Kronmüller, S. S. P. Parkin), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ 2007.
- 21E. Collini, C. Y. Wong, K. E. Wilk, P. M. G. Curmi, P. Brumer, G. D. Scholes, Nature 2010, 463, 644.
- 22T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 140401.
- 23C. Radhakrishnan, M. Parthasarathy, S. Jambulingam, T. Byrnes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 150504.
- 24S. Luo, Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. A 2017, 96, 022130.
- 25Z. Fan, Y. Peng, Y.-R. Zhang, S. Liu, L.-Z. Mu, H. Fan, Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 268.
- 26U. Singh, A. K. Pati, M. N. Bera, Mathematics 2016, 4, 47.
- 27H. Dolatkhah, S. Haseli, S. Salimi, A. S. Khorashad, Quantum Inf. Process. 2018, 18, 13.
- 28P. J. Coles, M. Berta, M. Tomamichel, S. Wehner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017, 89, 015002.
- 29H. Maassen, J. B. M. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 1103.
- 30D. Wang, F. Ming, M.-L. Hu, L. Ye, Ann. Phys. 2019, 531, 1900124.
- 31M. Berta, M. Christandl, R. Colbeck, J. M. Renes, R. Renner, Nat. Phys. 2010, 6, 659.
- 32F. Adabi, S. Salimi, S. Haseli, Phys. Rev. A 2016, 93, 062123.
- 33M.-N. Chen, D. Wang, L. Ye, Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 977.
- 34J. M. Renes, J.-C. Boileau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 020402.
- 35F. Ming, D. Wang, X.-G. Fan, W.-N. Shi, L. Ye, J.-L. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 2020, 102, 012206.
- 36D. Wang, F. Ming, X.-K. Song, L. Ye, J.-L. Chen, Eur. Phys. J. C 2020, 80, 800.
- 37A. Smirne, H.-P. Breuer, J. Piilo, B. Vacchini, Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82, 062114.
- 38H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 210401.
- 39D.-W. Luo, J.-B. Xu, Phys. Rev. A 2013, 87, 013801.
- 40M. A. Nielsen, I. Chuang, Am. J. Phys. 2002, 70, 558.
- 41W. Lee, M. Kim, H. Jo, Y. Song, J. Ahn, Phys. Rev. A 2019, 99, 043404.
- 42E. Braaten, H.-W. Hammer, G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. A 2017, 95, 012708.
- 43J. Lin, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1991, 37, 145.
- 44L. Maccone, A. K. Pati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 260401.
- 45A. Gilchrist, N. K. Langford, M. A. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 062310.
- 46E. Chitambar, M.-H. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 117, 020402.
- 47A. Streltsov, U. Singh, H. S. Dhar, M. N. Bera, G. Adesso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 020403.
