The Dynamic Relationships of Work Affect and Job Satisfaction with Perceptions of Fit
Corresponding Author
Allison S. Gabriel
The University of Akron
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Allison Gabriel, Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University, 301 West Main Street, PO Box 844000, Richmond, VA 23284-4000; [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Allison S. Gabriel
The University of Akron
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Allison Gabriel, Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University, 301 West Main Street, PO Box 844000, Richmond, VA 23284-4000; [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorA previous version of this paper was presented at the 26th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. We are grateful to Frederick Morgeson and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback in crafting this manuscript. This research study was funded by Singapore Management University through a research grant (C207/MSS6B012) from the Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1.
At the time of print, Allison S. Gabriel will be at the Department of Management, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Abstract
This study assessed the longitudinal relationship between perceived fit (i.e., person–organization fit, person–job fit) and affect-based variables (i.e., job satisfaction, negative affect, positive affect) using momentary (i.e., within-person level) and stable (i.e., between-person level) assessments of both sets of variables. In doing so, we tested 3 theoretical models of the perceived fit and work affect relationship (i.e., fit preceding affect; affect preceding fit; reciprocal fit–affect relations) to determine (a) the antecedents and consequences of fit perceptions, (b) whether fit perceptions exhibit meaningful within-person variability, and (c) if direct fit perceptions are simply the result of affect/job satisfaction at work or can influence such work experiences. In addition, we examined whether the relationships between affect/job satisfaction and fit perceptions were homologous (i.e., similar) across the 2 levels of analysis (i.e., within-person and between-person). Results indicated that fit primarily preceded affect and job satisfaction at both levels of analysis, though some specific relationships exhibited reciprocal causality and others supported affect as an antecedent of fit perceptions. Our findings paint a complex picture of the causal relationship between perceived fit and work affect.
REFERENCES
- Albarracín D, Kumkale GT. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 453–469.
- Beal DJ, Weiss HM. (2003). Methods of ecological momentary assessment in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 440–464.
- Billsberry J. (2009, August). Fit as wellness, misfit as illness. Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
- Bliese P, Chan D, Ployhart RE. (2007). Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 551–563.
- Bretz RD, Judge TA. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.
- Cable DM, DeRue SD. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875–884.
- Cammann C, Fichman M, Jenkins GD, Klesh J. (1983). Michigan organizational assessment questionnaire. In SE Seashore, EE Lawler, PH Mirvis, C Camman (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71–138). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
- Carver CS, Scheier MF. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139174794 Google Scholar
- Cascio W, Boudreau J. (2008). Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
- Chatman J. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333–349.
- Chen G, Bliese P, Mathieu J. (2005). Conceptual framework and statistical procedures for delineating and testing multilevel theories of homology. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 375–409.
- Christensen TC, Barrett LF, Bliss-Moreau E, Lebo K, Kaschub C. (2003). A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 53–78.
10.1023/A:1023609306024 Google Scholar
- Dalal RS, Hulin CL. (2008). Motivation for what? A multivariate dynamic perspective of the criterion. In R Kanfer, G Chen, R Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present, and future (pp. 63–100). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
- Dalal RS, Lam H, Weiss HM, Welch ER, Hulin CL. (2009). A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 1051–1066.
- Dawis RV, Lofquist LH. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- DeRue SD, Morgeson FP. (2007). Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1242–1253.
- Diener E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
- Edwards JR, Cable DM, Williamson IO, Lambert LS, Shipp AJ. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802–827.
- Elliot AJ. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116.
- Elliot AJ, Thrash TM. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
- Enders CK, Tofighi D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multi-level models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
- Fleeson W. (2004). Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate: The challenge and the opportunity of within-person variability. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 83–87.
- Fleeson W, Gallagher P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114.
- Fleeson W, Malanos AB, Achille NM. (2002). An intraindividual process approach to the relationship between extraversion and positive affect: Is acting extraverted as” good” as being extraverted? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1409–1422.
- Fredrickson BL. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.
- Fredrickson BL, Joiner T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13, 172–175.
- Gable SL, Reis HT, Elliot AJ. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135–1149.
- Gabriel AS, Diefendorff JM, Erickson RJ. (2011). The relations of daily task accomplishment satisfaction with changes in affect: A multilevel study in nurses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1095–1104.
- Greguras GJ, Diefendorff JK. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465–477.
- Henkel J, Hinsz V. (2004). Success and failure in goal attainment as a mood induction procedure. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 715–722.
- Ilies R, Dimotakis N, Watson D. (2010). Mood, blood pressure, and heart rate at work: An experience-sampling study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 120–130.
- Ilies R, Judge T. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467.
- Jansen K, Shipp A. (2013). A review and agenda for incorporating time in fit research. In AL Kristof-Brown, J Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 195–221). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781118320853.ch9 Google Scholar
- Judge TA, Thoresen CJ, Bono JE, Patton GK. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376–407.
- Kaplan S, Bradley JC, Luchman JN, Haynes D. (2009). On the role of positive and negative affectivity in job performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 162–176.
- Kristof AL. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49.
- Kristof-Brown AL, Billsberry J. (2013). Fit for the future. In AL Kristof-Brown, J Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 1–18). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781118320853.ch1 Google Scholar
- Kristof-Brown AL, Guay RP. (2010). Person-environment fit. In S Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: APA.
- Kristof-Brown AL, Jansen KJ. (2007). Issues of person–organization fit. In C Ostroff, TA Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 123–153). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
- Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342.
- Lyons HZ, O'Brien KM. (2006). The role of person-environment fit in the job satisfaction and tenure intentions of African American employees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 387–396.
- O'Reilly C, Chatman D, Caldwell D. (1991). Measuring person-job fit using a profile comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 648–657.
- Ostroff C. (2012). Person-environment fit in organizational settings. In SWJ Kozlowski (Ed.), Handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 373–408). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0012 Google Scholar
- Proudfoot JG, Corr PJ, Guest DE, Dunn G. (2009). Cognitive-behavioural training to change attributional style improves employee well-being, job satisfaction, productivity, and turnover. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 147–153.
- Raudenbush S, Bryk A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Resick C, Baltes B, Shantz C. (2007). Person-organization fit and work-related attitudes and decisions: Examining interactive effects with job fit and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1446–1455.
- Robinson WS. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.
- Roseman I, Spindel M, Jose P. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899–915.
- Salancik GR, Pfeffer J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 224–253.
- Scherer KR. (1999). Appraisal theory. In T Dalgleish, M Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 637–663). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/0470013494.ch30 Google Scholar
- Schmitt N, Oswald FL, Friede A, Imus A, Merritt S. (2008). Perceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 317–335.
- Schneider B, Goldstein H, Smith DB. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773.
- Schwarz N, Clore GL. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.
- Seligman MEP, Steen TA, Park N, Peterson C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.
- Shipp AJ, Edwards JR. (2005, April). The moving window of fit: The meaning and effects of past, present, and future P-E fit. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles, CA.
- Spector PE, O'Connell BJ. (1994). The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 1–12.
- Talbot D, Billsberry J. (2008, November). Square pegs, round holes. Paper presented at the 2nd Global e-Conference on Fit, Virtual Meeting.
- Talbot D, Billsberry J. (2010, December). Comparing and contrasting person-environment fit and misfit. Paper presented at the 4th Global e-Conference on Fit, Virtual Meeting.
- Vancouver JB, Schmitt N. (1991). An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology, 44, 333–352.
- Vancouver JB, Thompson CM, Williams AA. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605–620.
- Van Katwyk PT, Fox S, Spector PE, Kelloway EK. (2000). Using the job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 219–230.
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
- Weiss H, Beal DJ, Lucy SL, MacDermid SM. (2004). Constructing EMA studies with Q8 PMAT: The Purdue momentary assessment tool user's manual. West Lafayette, IN: Military Family Research Institute at Purdue University.
- Wheeler AR, Coleman-Gallagher V, Brouer RL, Sablynski CJ. (2007). When person-organization (mis)fit and (dis)satisfaction lead to turnover: The moderating role of perceived job mobility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 203–219.
10.1108/02683940710726447 Google Scholar
- Yang J, Diefendorff JM. (2009). The relations of daily counterproductive workplace behavior with emotions, situational antecedents, and personality moderators: A diary study in Hong Kong. Personnel Psychology, 62, 259–295.
- Yu KYT. (2009). Affective influences in person-environment fit theory: Exploring the role of affect as both cause and outcome of P–E fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1210–1226.
- Yu KYT. (2013). A motivational model of person-environment fit: Psychological motives as drivers of change. In AL Kristof-Brown, J Billsberry (Eds.), Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions (pp. 21–49). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Zajonc RB. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.