Volume 56, Issue 1 pp. 103-111
REVIEW MANUSCRIPT

Just culture in healthcare: An integrative review

Nina P. Barkell MSN, RN, ACNS-BC

Nina P. Barkell MSN, RN, ACNS-BC

Nursing Department, Oakland Community College, Waterford, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Stockton Snyder MSN, RNC-MNN

Corresponding Author

Susan Stockton Snyder MSN, RNC-MNN

Nursing Department, Oakland Community College, Waterford, Michigan, USA

Correspondence Susan Stockton Snyder, MSN, RNC-MNN, Nursing Department, Oakland Community College, 7350 Cooley Lake Rd, Waterford, MI 48327-4187, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 November 2020
Citations: 28

Abstract

Background

In spite of two decades of the patient safety movement in the United States, healthcare safety remains a significant problem. The paucity of empirical literature related to Just Culture in healthcare indicates a need for this concept to be examined and operationalized.

Purpose

The purpose was to appraise the literature regarding the use and application of Just Culture in healthcare.

Methods

Using Whittemore and Knafl's framework for integrative reviews, a review of the literature was conducted using Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, PsychInfo, and Cochrane Review to identify peer-reviewed literature published between 2010 and 2020. The following search terms were used: “Just Culture” AND “healthcare system” OR “health care” OR “healthcare.”

Results

After screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a set of 10 articles were included in the review. Four main themes were identified: Error Management, Balance, Leadership and Staff, and Systems Leadership for Change.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of empirical research and quality improvement projects focusing on Just Culture. The themes identified in this integrative review provide the direction and focus for additional research and quality improvement efforts that will promote the adoption of Just Culture and improvement in patient safety.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.