Volume 27, Issue 2 e70016
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Does Equal Income Maximize Social Welfare When Multiple Pure Public Goods Are Privately Provided?

Jun-ichi Itaya

Corresponding Author

Jun-ichi Itaya

Hokusei Gakuen University, Sapporo, Japan

Correspondence: Jun-ichi Itaya ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Atsue Mizushima

Atsue Mizushima

Faculty of Economics, Osaka University of Economics, Osaka, Japan

Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Gareth Myles

Gareth Myles

Retired, Dartmouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 March 2025

ABSTRACT

This paper analyzes the relationship between income distribution and social welfare when multiple pure public goods are privately provided. With a single public good and identical preferences, an increase in income inequality raises social welfare when it reduces the set of contributors so equality cannot be social optimal. We explore how this result is modified when there are multiple privately-provided public goods. It is shown that regions of neutrality alternate with regions of non-neutrality as income distribution is varied. In particular, in the setting of multiple privately-supplied public goods with non-idential preferences a region of non-neutrality emerges when individuals contribute to different public goods or when only one individual contributes. Moreover, social welfare will always be maximized by an income distribution located in a region of non-neutrality. This result implies that social welfare has local maxima at income distributions with inequality as well as around the equal income distribution. We also explore how the optimal extent of inequality is dependent on preference parameters.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.