Volume 32, Issue 5 pp. 1280-1287
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The predictive validity of the MoCA-LD for assessing mental capacity in adults with intellectual disabilities

Daniel Edge

Corresponding Author

Daniel Edge

Jeesal Akman Care Corporation Ltd, Dereham, UK

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Correspondence

Daniel Edge, Department of Psychology and Therapies, Jeesal Cawston Park, Aylsham, Norfolk, NR10 4JD, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Louise Ewing

Louise Ewing

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 May 2019
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

Mental capacity assessments currently rely on subjective opinion. Researchers have yet to explore the association between key cognitive functions of rational decision making and mental capacity classifications for people with intellectual disabilities.

Method

Sixty-three adults completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which yielded estimates of their overall cognitive ability (MoCA-LD) as well as their memory, attention, language and executive functioning. Differences in scores were explored for those who had, and lacked, capacity, and logistic regression was used to test the predictive validity of each measure.

Results

There were significant differences between both groups for all measures. Logistic regression identified MoCA-LD as a significant predictor of capacity assessment outcomes. ROC curve analysis provided novel, evidence-based benchmarks to help guide clinical practice based on MoCA-LD scores.

Conclusion

This study offers a foundation for more objective approaches to mental capacity assessment. This demonstrates that assessments of cognitive ability can yield information that is helpful for mental capacity evaluations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.