Volume 11, Issue 3 pp. 378-383
REVIEW

Is cellular senescence an example of antagonistic pleiotropy?

Stefano Giaimo

Stefano Giaimo

IFOM Foundation – The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy

SEMM – European School of Molecular Medicine via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna

Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna

IFOM Foundation – The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy

Istituto di Genetica Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Abbiategrasso 207, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 February 2012
Citations: 68
Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna, IFOM Foundation – The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy. Tel. +39 02 574303 227; fax +39 02 574303 231; e-mail: [email protected]

Summary

It is generally accepted that the permanent arrest of cell division known as cellular senescence contributes to aging by an antagonistic pleiotropy mechanism: cellular senescence would act beneficially early in life by suppressing cancer, but detrimentally later on by causing frailty and, paradoxically, cancer. In this review, we show that there is room to rethink this common view. We propose a critical appraisal of the arguments commonly brought in support of it, and we qualitatively analyse published results that are of relevance to understand whether or not cellular senescence-associated genes really act in an antagonistic-pleiotropic manner in humans.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.