Volume 33, Issue 12 pp. 1138-1143

DIFFERENTIAL ROLES OF RYANODINE- AND THAPSIGARGIN-SENSITIVE INTRACELLULAR Ca2+ STORES IN EXCITATION–CONTRACTION COUPLING IN SMOOTH MUSCLE OF GUINEA-PIG TAENIA CAECI

Shigeru Hishinuma

Shigeru Hishinuma

Department of Pharmacodynamics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masaki Saito

Masaki Saito

Department of Pharmacodynamics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 December 2006
Citations: 4
Shigeru Hishinuma, Department of Pharmacodynamics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan. Email: [email protected]

SUMMARY

  • 1

    To explore roles of intracellular Ca2+ stores in excitation–contraction coupling in smooth muscle, we examined the effects of ryanodine, a fixer of ryanodine receptor–Ca2+ channels to an open state, and thapsigargin, a selective inhibitor of the Ca2+ pump in the intracellular stores, on smooth muscle contraction in the presence and absence of extracellular Ca2+ in guinea-pig taenia caeci.

  • 2

    In Ca2+-free solution, contractions induced by 0.1 mmol/L carbachol and 0.1 mmol/L histamine were reduced to approximately 65% of control by either 1 µmol/L thapsigargin or 10 µmol/L ryanodine. In contrast, caffeine-induced contraction was reduced to approximately 40% of control by ryanodine, but was not affected by thapsigargin.

  • 3

    In the presence of extracellular Ca2+, thapsigargin slowly induced a large and sustained contraction. In contrast, ryanodine did not induce an apparent contraction, but increased the sensitivity of contractile responses to receptor agonists (carbachol, AHR-602 and histamine) or depolarizing high K+ with no changes in the maximal contraction.

  • 4

    These results suggest that there are pharmacological and physiological differences between ryanodine- and thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ stores in excitation–contraction coupling in smooth muscle, which may be responsible for their differential effects on the Ca2+-influx pathway.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.