Volume 24, Issue 5 e12649
LITERATURE REVIEW

Tepid massage for febrile children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Junghee Lim PhD, RN

Junghee Lim PhD, RN

Graduate Student

Department of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Juyoung Kim RN

Juyoung Kim RN

Researcher

Department of Nursing, Korean Nurses Association, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Bora Moon RN

Bora Moon RN

Department of Nursing, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Gaeun Kim PhD, RN

Corresponding Author

Gaeun Kim PhD, RN

Assistant Professor

Department of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea

Correspondence

Gaeun Kim, Keimyung University College of Nursing, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Daegu 704-701, South Korea.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 May 2018
Citations: 4

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to examine the effect of tepid massage in febrile children comparing with other fever management.

Methods

Experimental studies published in English were included; quasi-experimental research studies were also included in consideration of rare experimental studies in Korean. The search strategy sought to identify published research reports in the English language and covered all major databases up to 2016. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using a Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network's Methodology Checklist. Means and standard deviations were used for continuous variables, and standardized mean difference was used for variables of different scales. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics after visual reviewing with forest plots.

Results

This study reviewed mainly the effect of tepid massage on temperature compared with the use of antipyretics, along with other adverse effects in relation with fever management. The results revealed no significant effect of tepid massage on temperature in febrile children. In addition, incidence rates of adverse effects including chills, goose pimples, and discomfort were higher in tepid massage groups.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed the need for re-verification of commonly used practice including the use of tepid massage and proper body temperature measurement.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.