Volume 94, Issue 6 pp. 1039-1044
SURGICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Review of Māori equity in surgical trainee selection

Calum Fisher MBChB, BDS (Hons), MRACDS(PDS)

Corresponding Author

Calum Fisher MBChB, BDS (Hons), MRACDS(PDS)

Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Correspondence

Dr Calum Fisher, Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Philip Bird MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology)

Philip Bird MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology)

Department of Surgery, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Department of Otolaryngology, Te Whatu Ora – Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew McCombie BSc, BA(Hons), PhD (Otago)

Andrew McCombie BSc, BA(Hons), PhD (Otago)

Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Tania Huria BA(Cant), BNS(Chch Poly IT), MPH(Otago), PhD(Otago)

Tania Huria BA(Cant), BNS(Chch Poly IT), MPH(Otago), PhD(Otago)

Māori Indigenous Health Institute (MIHI), University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Rachelle Love MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology)

Rachelle Love MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology)

Department of Otolaryngology, Te Whatu Ora – Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2024
C. Fisher MBChB, BDS (Hons), MRACDS(PDS); P. Bird MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology); A. McCombie BSc, BA(Hons), PhD (Otago); T. Huria BA(Cant), BNS(Chch Poly IT), MPH(Otago), PhD(Otago); R. Love MBChB, FRACS (Otolaryngology).

Abstract

Background

The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) aims to achieve Māori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce. The RACS Māori Health Strategy and Action Plans encourage Surgical Education and Training (SET) selection criteria that recognizes and credit applicants who identify as Māori or demonstrate competence in Māori health issues. This study investigates the current SET selection criteria for Māori entering surgical specialties.

Methods

The selection criteria for each surgical speciality for the proposed 2024 intake were examined through a documentary analysis. Criteria were reviewed for applicability to Māori identification and/or cultural competency.

Results

Criteria related to Māori identification and/or cultural competency make up 6%, 2%, and 1.5% of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck, General, and Vascular Surgery total SET selection score respectively. Criteria related to Māori identification and/or cultural competency make up 9% and 0.1% of Orthopaedic and Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery ranking scores for interview eligibility respectively. Cardiothoracic Surgery, Paediatric Surgery, Neurosurgery and Urology specialties do not incorporate any criteria appertaining to Māori. Allocation of research-related points determined by authorship may disincentivize Māori trainees.

Conclusions

Some surgical specialties fail to recognize or credit Māori identification and cultural competency in SET selection criteria. There is a need for regular auditing to ensure SET criteria align with the RACS aspirations for Māori health equity and cultural safety within the surgical workforce.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.