Volume 88, Issue 1 pp. 31-46
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The 3A6-TCR/superagonist/HLA-DR2a complex shows similar interface and reduced flexibility compared to the complex with self-peptide

Ilaria Salutari

Ilaria Salutari

Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Roland Martin

Roland Martin

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Amedeo Caflisch

Corresponding Author

Amedeo Caflisch

Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Correspondence

Amedeo Caflisch, Department of Biochemistry, University of Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 June 2019

Funding information Swiss National Science Foundation

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition of the myelin basic protein (MBP) peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein HLA-DR2a, one of the MHC class II alleles associated with multiple sclerosis, is highly variable. Interactions in the trimolecular complex between the TCR of the MBP83-99-specific T cell clone 3A6 with the MBP-peptide/HLA-DR2a (abbreviated TCR/pMHC) lead to substantially different proliferative responses when comparing the wild-type decapeptide MBP90-99 and a superagonist peptide, which differs mainly in the residues that point toward the TCR. Here, we investigate the influence of the peptide sequence on the interface and intrinsic plasticity of the TCR/pMHC trimolecular and pMHC bimolecular complexes by molecular dynamics simulations. The intermolecular contacts at the TCR/pMHC interface are similar for the complexes with the superagonist and the MBP self-peptide. The orientation angle between TCR and pMHC fluctuates less in the complex with the superagonist peptide. Thus, the higher structural stability of the TCR/pMHC tripartite complex with the superagonist peptide, rather than a major difference in binding mode with respect to the self-peptide, seems to be responsible for the stronger proliferative response.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.