Volume 16, Issue 8 pp. 908-918
NARRATIVE REVIEW—CME

Steroid myopathy and rehabilitation in patients with cancer

Vera Tsetlina MD

Corresponding Author

Vera Tsetlina MD

Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterial Columbia Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence

Vera Tsetlina, Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Columbia Irving Medical Center, 180 Fort Washington Avenue New York, NY 10019, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ray A. Stanford DO

Ray A. Stanford DO

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Grigory Syrkin MD

Grigory Syrkin MD

Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Katarzyna Ibanez MD

Katarzyna Ibanez MD

Department of Neurology, Rehabilitation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 February 2024
Citations: 2

Answer questions and earn CME credit.

Abstract

Steroids are broadly used in oncology, despite known adverse events such as glucocorticosteroid-induced myopathy (SM). To date there are no accepted guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of SM. The purpose of this review is to provide up-to-date information regarding SM with emphasis on neuro-oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, given they are at high risk of experiencing SM following routine treatment with steroids. Our work is a combination of a comprehensive narrative review regarding etiology, pathogenesis, incidence, clinical presentation and treatment options for SM and a scoping review on exercise therapy for SM. We have identified 24 in vivo studies of different exercise modalities in the settings of glucocorticosteroid treatment. Twenty of 24 studies demonstrated decreased muscle catabolism with exercise training. Both endurance and resistance exercises at mild to moderate intensity were beneficial. The value of high-intensity activities remains questionable as it may worsen muscle atrophy. Rehabilitation interventions, along with pharmacologic and dietary considerations, may be beneficial in preventing or reversing SM. Potential adverse events of some of these interventions and expected caveats in translating findings in preclinical models to human settings warrant caution and demand controlled clinical studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.