The influence of deviant advertisements on customer responses: The role of cultural tightness in emerging and developed economies
Corresponding Author
Sandra Pauser
Lauder Business School, Vienna, Austria
Correspondence Sandra Pauser, Endowed Professorship in Marketing Management, Lauder Business School, Hofzeile 18-20, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sandra Pauser
Lauder Business School, Vienna, Austria
Correspondence Sandra Pauser, Endowed Professorship in Marketing Management, Lauder Business School, Hofzeile 18-20, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Capturing and gaining customers' attention is key to the success of any business. Deviant advertising, including atypical marketing activities that diverge from a social norm, can either be acknowledged due to its attention-generating character, or is—more often—deemed inappropriate and results in unfavorable consumer responses. This paper reinforces that, in general, ads with deviant content (e.g., the depiction of violence) are evaluated worse as compared to ads portraying nondeviant content. In particular, the role of cultural tightness (i.e., strictness of obeying social norms within society) is empirically examined in analyzing deviant advertisements and its effects on ad attitude and customer responses in an emerging and developed economy. Economic development predominantly affects customer responses of nondeviant ad content (but not deviant ad content). By employing qualitative and quantitative studies, including communicational and observational data collection, this research shows that deviant depictions (vs. nondeviant ads) promote negative attitudes toward ads, and consumers are culturally sensitive, which provides important managerial implications for international marketers.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
mar21885-sup-0001-Appendix_done.docx56.4 KB | Supporting information. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Aaker, J. L., Brumbaugh, A. M., & Grier, S. A. (2000). Nontarget markets and viewer distinctiveness: The impact of target marketing on advertising attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(3), 127–140.
- Barone, M. J., & Jewell, R. D. (2013). The innovator's license: A latitude to deviate from category norms. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 120–134.
- Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.
- Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34–51.
- Browne, B. A., & Kaldenberg, D. O. (1997). Conceptualizing self-monitoring: Links to materialism and product involvement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(1), 31–44.
10.1108/07363769710155848 Google Scholar
- Bushman, B. J. (1993). What's in a name? The moderating role of public self-consciousness on the relation between brand label and brand preference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 857–861.
- Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1179–1198.
- Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (2001). Anomia and deviant behaviour in marketing: Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(5), 322–338.
10.1108/EUM0000000005526 Google Scholar
- Chan, D. K.-S. (1996). Tightness-looseness revisited: Some preliminary analyses in Japan and the United States. International Journal of Psychology, 31(1), 1–12.
- Chan, K., Li, L., Diehl, S., & Terlutter, R. (2007). Consumers' response to offensive advertising: A cross cultural study. International Marketing Review, 24(5), 606–628.
- Chanchani, S., & Theivanathampillai, P. (2002). Typologies of culture. Department of Accountancy and Business Law Working Papers Series, 04/10/02. University of Otago, Dunedin.
- Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 643–654.
- Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.
- Clinard, M. B. (1957). Sociology of deviant behavior. Rinehart.
- Dahl, D. W., Frankenberger, K. D., & Manchanda, R. V. (2003). Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 268–280.
- De Pelsmacker, P., & Van Den Bergh, J. (1996). The communication effects of provocation in print advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 15(3), 203–221.
10.1111/j.0265-0487.1996.00022.pp.x Google Scholar
- Feinberg, S. L., Dufur, M. J., Famelos, A., & Fisher, V. (2014). Senseless messaging: Advertising images of illegal driving and deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior, 35(11), 843–858.
- Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., Duan, L., Almaliach, A., Ang, S., Arnadottir, J., Aycan, Z., Boehnke, K., Boski, P., Cabecinhas, R., Chan, D., Chhokar, J., D'Amato, A., Ferrer, M., Fischlmayr, I. C., … Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104.
- Goode, E. (2016). Deviant behavior ( 11th ed.). Routledge.
10.4324/9781315643632 Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis ( 2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Javed, M. B., & Zeb, H. (2011). Good shock or bad shock: What impact shock advertisements are creating on the mind of viewers. In: Marketing & Program Leader International Business: Annual Conference on Innovations in Business & Management (pp. 1–12), January 26–27, University of East London.
- Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
- Kaushal, S. K., & Kumar, R. (2016). Influence of attitude towards advertisement on purchase intention: Exploring the mediating role of attitude towards brand using SEM approach. IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 45–59.
- Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 97–105.
- Kroeber-Riel, W., & Esch, F. R. (2015). Strategie und Technik der Werbung, Verhaltenswissenschaftliche und neurowissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse. Kohlhammer Verlag.
10.17433/978-3-17-026259-1 Google Scholar
- Laland, K. N. (2004). Social learning strategies. Learning & Behavior, 32(1), 4–14.
- Levy, M. R. (2006). The Lazarsfeld-Stanton program analyzer: An historical note. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 30–38.
10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb02516.x Google Scholar
- Li, R., Gordon, S., & Gelfand, M. J. (2017). Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(3), 377–391.
- Lowe. (2010). https://www.adsoftheworld.com/media/print/caribu_canari
- Lutz, R. J., MacKenzie, S. B., & Belch, G. E. (1983). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 532–539.
- Macleod. (2008). https://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2008/well-at-least-he-drives-a-prius/
- Macleod. (2010). https://theinspirationroom.com/daily/2010/diesel-kick-ass-advertising-campaign/
- Mathwick, C., & Rigdon, E. (2004). Play, flow, and the online search experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 324–332.
- Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research (Vol. 1, pp. 159–176). Sage.
- Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 318–332.
- Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.
10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03 Google Scholar
- Parry, S., Jones, R., Stern, P., & Robinson, M. (2013). ‘Shockvertising’: An exploratory investigation into attitudinal variations and emotional reactions to shock advertising. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(2), 112–121.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
- Price, R. H., & Bouffard, D. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 579–586.
- Rose, P., & DeJesus, S. P. (2007). A model of motivated cognition to account for the link between self-monitoring and materialism. Psychology & Marketing, 24(2), 93–115.
- Sabri, O. (2012). Taboo advertising: Can humor help to attract attention and enhance recall? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(4), 407–422.
10.2753/MTP1069-6679200404 Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., & Weisskirch, R. S. (2008). Broadening the study of the self: Integrating the study of personal identity and cultural identity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 635–651.
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00077.x Google Scholar
- Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 317–338.
- Shinnar, R. S., & Zamantılı Nayır, D. (2019). Immigrant entrepreneurship in an emerging economy: The case of Turkey. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2), 559–575.
- Skorupa, P. (2014). Shocking contents in social and commercial advertising. Creativity Studies, 7(2), 69–81.
10.3846/23450479.2014.997317 Google Scholar
- Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 586–597.
- Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125–139.
- Statista. (2022). Advertising media owner's revenue worldwide from 2012 to 2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/236943/global-advertising-spending/
- Thompson, W. E., & Gibbs, J. C. (2016). Deviance and deviants: A sociological approach. John Wiley & Sons.
- Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520.
- Vézina, R., & Paul, O. (1997). Provocation in advertising: A conceptualization and an empirical assessment. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(2), 177–192.
- Virvilaite, R., & Matuleviciene, M. (2013). The impact of shocking advertising to consumer buying behavior. Economics and Management, 18(1), 134–141.
10.5755/j01.em.18.1.3643 Google Scholar
- Waller, D. S. (2005). A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 11(2–3), 3–15.
10.1300/J057v11n02_02 Google Scholar
- Waller, D. S., Fam, K. S., & Zafer Erdogan, B. (2005). Advertising of controversial products: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 6–13.
- Wilson, M., Robson, K., & Pitt, L. (2022). Consumer subversion and its relationship to anti-consumption, deviant and dysfunctional behaviors, and consumer revenge. Psychology & Marketing, 39(3), 598–611.
- World Bank. (2021). World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups
- Youn, N., Park, J., & Eom, H. J. (2019). Reactions to nonconformity imagery in advertising among Chinese and Japanese consumers: The effect of personal and national cultural tightness. Journal of Advertising, 48(5), 532–554.
- Zarantonello, L., Schmitt, B. H., & Jedidi, K. (2014). How to advertise and build brand knowledge globally: Comparing television advertising appeals across developed and emerging economies. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(4), 420–434.