Structuring Electronic Brainstorming Tasks to Improve Group Creativity: How Structuring Serially Can Benefit Idea Elaboration
Baptiste Van Eeckhout
LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nicolas Michinov
LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Correspondence:
Nicolas Michinov ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorKarine Le Rudulier
IGR-IAE, IODE (UMR CNRS 6262), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Search for more papers by this authorBaptiste Van Eeckhout
LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nicolas Michinov
LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Correspondence:
Nicolas Michinov ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorKarine Le Rudulier
IGR-IAE, IODE (UMR CNRS 6262), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
Search for more papers by this authorFunding: This research was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France 2030 programme (ANR-21-DMES-0001).
ABSTRACT
For several decades, brainstorming in groups and its variants have been widely examined in research as a technique to produce ideas. The way to stimulate elaboration by linking ideas to those previously given by others during a brainstorming session is a challenge for researchers and practitioners aiming to go beyond idea generation. Despite Osborn's (1953, 1963) rules inviting participants to build on ideas of their group members to produce their own, until recently very few studies have explicitly examined idea elaboration and its determinants. The present study aimed to investigate how structuring an electronic brainstorming task using a digital environment to produce ideas freely or serially might influence the elaboration of ideas in groups. A multilevel modeling analysis revealed that, independently of the groups, the quantity and quality of ideas produced, serial brainstorming led to a greater elaboration of ideas than free brainstorming. These findings provide the initial empirical evidence about the efficacy of structuring electronic brainstorming in a serial mode to stimulate idea elaboration in groups.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at: https://osf.io/re8az/.
References
- Aguinis, H., R. K. Gottfredson, and S. A. Culpepper. 2013. “Best-Practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Level Interaction Effects Using Multilevel Modeling.” Journal of Management 39, no. 6: 1490–1528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188.
- Amabile, T. M. 1982. “Social Psychology of Creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, no. 5: 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.
- Barrett, M. S., A. Creech, and K. Zhukov. 2021. “Creative Collaboration and Collaborative Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 713445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713445.
- Baruah, J., and K. Green. 2023. “Innovation in Virtual Teams: The Critical Role of Anonymity Across Divergent and Convergent Thinking Processes.” Journal of Creative Behavior 57, no. 4: jocb.603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.603.
- Baruah, J., P. B. Paulus, and N. W. Kohn. 2021. “The Effect of the Sequence of Creative Processes on the Quality of the Ideas: The Benefit of a Simultaneous Focus on Originality and Feasibility.” Journal of Creative Behavior 55, no. 4: 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.500.
- Bickel, R. 2017. Multilevel Analysis for Applied Research: It's Just Regression! Guilford Press.
- Bormann, E. G. 1985. “Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Communication Formulation.” Journal of Communication 35, no. 4: 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x.
- Brown, V. A. 2021. “An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4, no. 1: e96035. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351.
- Brown, V. R., and P. B. Paulus. 2002. “Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, no. 6: 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00202.
- Coursey, L. E., R. T. Gertner, B. C. Williams, J. B. Kenworthy, P. B. Paulus, and S. Doboli. 2019. “Linking the Divergent and Convergent Processes of Collaborative Creativity: The Impact of Expertise Levels and Elaboration Processes.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00699.
- de Vreede, G.-J., R. O. Briggs, and R. Reiter-Palmon. 2010. “Exploring Asynchronous Brainstorming in Large Groups: A Field Comparison of Serial and Parallel Subgroups.” Human Factors 52, no. 2: 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809354748.
- Dennis, A. R., J. E. Aronson, W. G. Heninger, and E. D. Walker. 1999. “Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming.” MIS Quarterly 23, no. 1: 95. https://doi.org/10.2307/249411.
- Dippo, C., and B. Kudrowitz. 2015. “The Effects of Elaboration in Creativity Tests as It Pertains to Overall Scores and How It Might Prevent a Person From Thinking of Creative Ideas During the Early Stages of Brainstorming and Idea Generation.” Volume 7: 27th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, V007T06A007. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2015-46789.
10.1115/DETC2015?46789 Google Scholar
- Gallucci, M. 2020. “GAMLj Suite for Jamovi [Logiciel].” https://github.com/gamlj/gamlj.
- Gillier, T., and B. L. Bayus. 2022. “Group Creativity in the Wild: When Building on Ideas Enhances the Generation and Selection of Creative Ideas.” Creativity and Innovation Management 31, no. 3: 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12509.
- Girotra, K., C. Terwiesch, and K. T. Ulrich. 2010. “Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea.” Management Science 56, no. 4: 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1144.
- Goldenberg, O., J. R. Larson, and J. Wiley. 2013. “Goal Instructions, Response Format, and Idea Generation in Groups.” Small Group Research 44, no. 3: 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413486701.
- Goldschmidt, G. 2014. Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9455.001.0001.
10.7551/mitpress/9455.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Gonthier, C., and M. Besançon. 2024. “It Is Not Always Better to Have More Ideas: Serial Order and the Trade-Off Between Fluency and Elaboration in Divergent Thinking Tasks.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 18, no. 4: 480–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000485.
- Guilford, J. P. 1967. The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
- Henningsen, D. D., and M. L. M. Henningsen. 2018. “Does Brainstorming Promote Cohesiveness? How the Rules of Brainstorming Mirror Symbolic Convergence.” Communication Reports 31, no. 2: 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476.
10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476 Google Scholar
- Jamovi. 2022. “The Jamovi Project (Version 2.3).” https://www.jamovi.org.
- Kaufman, J. C., J. Baer, D. H. Cropley, R. Reiter-Palmon, and S. Sinnett. 2013. “Furious Activity vs. Understanding: How Much Expertise Is Needed to Evaluate Creative Work?” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 7, no. 4: 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034809.
- Kenworthy, J. B., P. B. Paulus, A. A. Minai, and S. Doboli. 2021. “ Divergent and Convergent Creativity.” In Creativity and Innovation, edited by I. S. Doboli, J. B. Kenworthy, A. A. Minai, and P. B. Paulus, 69–98. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77198-0_4.
10.1007/978-3-030-77198-0_4 Google Scholar
- Kohn, N. W., P. B. Paulus, and Y. Choi. 2011. “Building on the Ideas of Others: An Examination of the Idea Combination Process.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, no. 3: 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.004.
- Korde, R., and P. B. Paulus. 2017. “Alternating Individual and Group Idea Generation: Finding the Elusive Synergy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70: 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.002.
- le Hénaff, B., N. Michinov, and O. Le Bohec. 2018. “Applying the SIDE Model to Brainwriting: The Impact of Intergroup Comparison and Anonymity on Creative Performance.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48, no. 7: 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12515.
10.1111/jasp.12515 Google Scholar
- Litchfield, R., J. Fan, and V. Brown. 2011. “Directing Idea Generation Using Brainstorming With Specific Novelty Goals.” Motivation and Emotion 35, no. 2: 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9203-3.
- Luke, D. 2004. Multilevel Modeling. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985147.
10.4135/9781412985147 Google Scholar
- Maas, C. J. M., and J. J. Hox. 2005. “Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling.” Methodology 1, no. 3: 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.
10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 Google Scholar
- McMahon, K., A. Ruggeri, J. E. Kämmer, and K. V. Katsikopoulos. 2016. “Beyond Idea Generation: The Power of Groups in Developing Ideas.” Creativity Research Journal 28, no. 3: 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195637.
- McNeish, D. 2017. “Small Sample Methods for Multilevel Modeling: A Colloquial Elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger Correction.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 52, no. 5: 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1344538.
- Meadow, A., S. J. Parnes, and H. Reese. 1959. “Influence of Brainstorming Instructions and Problem Sequence on a Creative Problem-Solving Test.” Journal of Applied Psychology 43, no. 6: 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043917.
- Michinov, N. 2012. “Is Electronic Brainstorming or Brainwriting the Best Way to Improve Creative Performance in Groups? An Overlooked Comparison of Two Idea-Generation Techniques.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42: E222–E243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x.
- Michinov, N., E. Jamet, N. Métayer, and B. Le Hénaff. 2015. “The Eyes of Creativity: Impact of Social Comparison and Individual Creativity on Performance and Attention to Others' Ideas During Electronic Brainstorming.” Computers in Human Behavior 42: 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037.
- Michinov, N., and S. Jeanson. 2023. “Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic ‘Brainwriting’ Groups.” Human Factors 65, no. 7: 1542–1553. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211048301.
- Nelson, J., and J. Guegan. 2022. “ Creative Collaboration in Groups.” In Homo Creativus, edited by T. Lubart, M. Botella, S. Bourgeois -Bougrine, et al., 87–105. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99674-1_6.
10.1007/978-3-030-99674-1_6 Google Scholar
- Nemeth, C. J., B. Personnaz, M. Personnaz, and J. A. Goncalo. 2004. “The Liberating Role of Conflict in Group Creativity: A Study in Two Countries.” European Journal of Social Psychology 34, no. 4: 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.210.
- Nezlek, J. B. 2008. “An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology: Multilevel Analyses.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, no. 2: 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x.
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x Google Scholar
- Nijstad, B. A., and W. Stroebe. 2006. “How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, no. 3: 186–213. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_1.
- Offner, A. K., T. J. Kramer, and J. P. Winter. 1996. “The Effects of Facilitation, Recording, and Pauses on Group Brainstorming.” Small Group Research 27, no. 2: 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496272005.
- Osborn, A. F. 1953. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. 1st ed. Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Osborn, A. F. 1963. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. 3rd ed. Charles Scribner's Sons.
- Parnes, S. J., and A. Meadow. 1959. “Effects of « Brainstorming » Instructions on Creative Problem Solving by Trained and Untrained Subjects.” Journal of Educational Psychology 50, no. 4: 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047223.
- Paulus, P. B. 2020. “ Reflections on the Impact of Teresa Amabile on the Development of the Field of Group Creativity.” In Creativity at Work, edited by R. Reiter-Palmon, C. M. Fisher, and J. S. Mueller, 109–119. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_11.
10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_11 Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., and J. Baruah. 2018. “ Enhancing Creativity in e-Planning: Recommendations From a Collaborative Creativity Perspective.” In New Approaches, Methods, and Tools in Urban E-Planning, edited by C. N. Silva, 192–222. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5999-3.ch007.
10.4018/978-1-5225-5999-3.ch007 Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., J. Baruah, and J. Kenworthy. 2023. “ Brainstorming: How to Get the Best Ideas out of the “Group Brain” for Organizational Creativity.” In Handbook of Organizational Creativity: Individual and Group Level Influences, edited by R. Reiter-Palmon and S. Hunter, 373–389. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91840-4.00019-0.
10.1016/B978-0-323-91840-4.00019-0 Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., M. Dzindolet, and N. W. Kohn. 2012. “ Collaborative Creativity—Group Creativity and Team Innovation.” In Handbook of Organizational Creativity, edited by M. D. Mumford, 327–357. Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00014-8 Google Scholar
- Paulus, P. B., and J. B. Kenworthy. 2020. “ Group and Intergroup Creativity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning, edited by L. Argote and J. M. Levine, 388–410. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263362.013.34.
- Paulus, P. B., N. W. Kohn, and L. E. Arditti. 2011. “Effects of Quantity and Quality Instructions on Brainstorming.” Journal of Creative Behavior 45, no. 1: 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01083.x.
- Paulus, P. B., N. W. Kohn, L. E. Arditti, and R. M. Korde. 2013. “Understanding the Group Size Effect in Electronic Brainstorming.” Small Group Research 44, no. 3: 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413479674.
- Paulus, P. B., T. Nakui, V. L. Putman, and V. R. Brown. 2006. “Effects of Task Instructions and Brief Breaks on Brainstorming.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 10, no. 3: 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.206.
- Paulus, P. B., and H.-C. Yang. 2000. “Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, no. 1: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2888.
- Peter, L., N. Michinov, M. Besançon, et al. 2021. “Revisiting the Effects of Gender Diversity in Small Groups on Divergent Thinking: A Large-Scale Study Using Synchronous Electronic Brainstorming.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 723235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723235.
- Qi, S., X. Bai, and Y. Li. 2022. “Competing Within and Beyond the Boundary: Joint Effect of Intergroup and Intragroup Competitions on Group Creativity.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 46: 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101194.
- Reiter-Palmon, R. 2020. “ The Consensual Assessment Technique: Refinement and Further Development.” In Creativity at Work: A Festschrift in Honor of Teresa Amabile, edited by R. Reiter-Palmon, C. M. Fisher, and J. S. Mueller, 157–165. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_15.
10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_15 Google Scholar
- Runco, M. A., and S. Acar. 2012. “Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential.” Creativity Research Journal 24, no. 1: 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929.
- Said-Metwaly, S., B. Fernández-Castilla, E. Kyndt, and W. van den Noortgate. 2020. “Testing Conditions and Creative Performance: Meta-Analyses of the Impact of Time Limits and Instructions.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 14, no. 1: 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000244.
- Snijders, T., and R. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage Publishers.
- Snijders, T. A. B. 2005. “ Power and Sample Size in Multilevel Linear Models.” In Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, edited by I. B. S. Everitt and D. C. Howell, 1st ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa492.
10.1002/0470013192.bsa492 Google Scholar
- Torrance, E. P. 1969. Creativity. What Research Says to the Teacher, Series. Vol. 28. National Education Association.
- van der Lugt, R. 2000. “Developing a Graphic Tool for Creative Problem Solving in Design Groups.” Design Studies 21, no. 5: 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00021-1.
10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00021-1 Google Scholar
- Zhou, X., H.-K. Zhai, B. Delidabieke, H. Zeng, Y.-X. Cui, and X. Cao. 2019. “Exposure to Ideas, Evaluation Apprehension, and Incubation Intervals in Collaborative Idea Generation.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01459.