Volume 59, Issue 2 e70023
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Structuring Electronic Brainstorming Tasks to Improve Group Creativity: How Structuring Serially Can Benefit Idea Elaboration

Baptiste Van Eeckhout

Baptiste Van Eeckhout

LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France

Search for more papers by this author
Nicolas Michinov

Corresponding Author

Nicolas Michinov

LP3C (Psychology of Cognition, Behavior, Communication Laboratory), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France

Correspondence:

Nicolas Michinov ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Karine Le Rudulier

Karine Le Rudulier

IGR-IAE, IODE (UMR CNRS 6262), Univ Rennes, Rennes, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 April 2025

Funding: This research was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France 2030 programme (ANR-21-DMES-0001).

ABSTRACT

For several decades, brainstorming in groups and its variants have been widely examined in research as a technique to produce ideas. The way to stimulate elaboration by linking ideas to those previously given by others during a brainstorming session is a challenge for researchers and practitioners aiming to go beyond idea generation. Despite Osborn's (1953, 1963) rules inviting participants to build on ideas of their group members to produce their own, until recently very few studies have explicitly examined idea elaboration and its determinants. The present study aimed to investigate how structuring an electronic brainstorming task using a digital environment to produce ideas freely or serially might influence the elaboration of ideas in groups. A multilevel modeling analysis revealed that, independently of the groups, the quantity and quality of ideas produced, serial brainstorming led to a greater elaboration of ideas than free brainstorming. These findings provide the initial empirical evidence about the efficacy of structuring electronic brainstorming in a serial mode to stimulate idea elaboration in groups.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at: https://osf.io/re8az/.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.