Engineering in the K-12 STEM Standards of the 50 U.S. States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent
Corresponding Author
Ronald L. Carr
P-12 Engineering Education Research Fellow>
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lynch D. Bennett IV
Research Assistant and Technical Writer
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Strobel
Director, INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning and Assistant Professor
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ronald L. Carr
P-12 Engineering Education Research Fellow>
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Lynch D. Bennett IV
Research Assistant and Technical Writer
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Johannes Strobel
Director, INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning and Assistant Professor
Purdue University
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907; [email protected].
Engineering Education and Curriculum & Instruction (Learning Design and Technology), Purdue University, 315 North Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907; [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Federal initiatives promoting STEM education to bridge the achievement gap and maintain the nation's creative leadership inspired this study investigating engineering content in elementary education standards. The literature review concluded that common national P-12 engineering education standards are beneficial, particularly when amplified by the common core standards movement.
Purpose (Hypothesis)
Compilation and analysis of engineering present in states' academic standards was performed to determine if a consensus on the big ideas of engineering already exists and to organize and present those big ideas so that they can be infused into state or national standards.
Design/Method
Extensive examination and broad coding of mathematics, science, technology and vocational/career standards in all 50 states identified instances of engineering content in existing standards. Explicit coding categorized engineering-relevant standards by subject area. Manual and electronic content analysis identified key engineering skills and knowledge in existing standards. Inter-rater reliability verified consistency among five individuals through descriptive statistical measures.
Results
Engineering skills and knowledge were found in 41 states' standards. Most items rated as engineering through strict coding were found in either science or technology and vocational standards. Engineering was found in only one state's math standard. Some states explicitly mentioned engineering standards without any specifics. A consensus of big ideas found in standards is provided in the discussion.
Conclusions
While engineering standards do exist, uniform or systematically introduced engineering standards are less prevalent. Now is the time to move forward in the formation of national standards based on the state standards identified in this study.
References
- Beatty, A. (1997). Taking stock: What have we learned about making education standards internationally competitive? Board on International Comparative Studies in Education Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3): 369–387.
- Bybee, R. W. (2000). Achieving technological literacy: A national imperative. The Technology Teacher, 60 (2): 23–28.
- Bybee, R. W. (2009). K-12 Engineering education standards: Opportunities and barriers. Workshop on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- CNN Money. (2010). Best jobs in America 2010 - Top 100. Retrieved from http:money.cnn.commagazinesmoneymagbestjobs2010full_listindex.html.
- Carr, R., & Strobel, J. (2011). Integrating engineering into secondary math and science curriculum: Preparing teachers. 1st Integrated STEM Education Conference. Ewing, NJ: IEEE.
- Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education (CSMEE). (1995). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
- Chae, Y., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. (2010). Core concepts for engineering literacy: The interrelationships among STEM disciplines. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.
-
Chandler, John,
Fontenot, A. Dean, &
Tate, Derrick (2011). Problems associated with a lack of cohesive policy in K-12 pre-college engineering.
Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1 (1), 40–48. Retrieved from http:docs.lib.purdue.edujpeervol1iss15.
10.7771/2157-9288.1029 Google Scholar
- Committee of Ten. (1894). Report of the committee of ten on secondary school studies: With the reports of the conferences arranged by the committee. New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: The American Book Co.
- Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards. (2010). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies.
- Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. (2008). Understanding and improving K-12 engineering in the United States project summary for public comment. ( L. Katehi, G. Pearson, & M. Feder, Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education. (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
- Committee on the Engineer of 2020, National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Consortium for Policy Research Education. (1993). Developing content standards: Creating a process for change. Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
- Douglas, J., Iverson, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004) Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Washington, DC: The American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved from http:www.engineeringk12.org.
- Dugger Jr., W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Retrieved from http:www.iteaconnect.orgResourcesPressRoomAustraliaPaper.pdf.
- Duncan, D., Oware, E., Cox, M., & Dux, Diefes H. (2007). Program and curriculum assessment for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning (INSPIRE) Summer Academies for P-6 Teachers. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1): 103–120.
- Foster, J. (2010). The development of technology/engineering concepts in Massachusetts Academic Standards. In Committee on Standards for K-12 Engineering Education, Standards for k-12 engineering education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2008). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18 (1): 60–73.
- Grayson, L. (1980). A brief history of engineering education in the United States. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 16 (3), 373–392. doi:10.1109/TAES.1980.308907.
-
Grier, J. M., &
Johnston, C. C. (2009). An inquiry into the development of teacher identities in STEM career changers.
Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20 (1), 57–75.
10.1007/s10972-008-9119-2 Google Scholar
- ITEEA. (2010). ITEA officially becomes ITEEA. Reston, VA. Retrieved from http:www.iteea.orgAboutITEEANameChange.pdf.
- Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Koehler, C., Giblin, D., Moss, D., Faraclas, E., & Kazerounian, K. (2007). Are concepts of technical & engineering literacy included in state curriculum standards? A regional overview of the nexus between technical & engineering literacy and state science frameworks. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
-
Linn, M.,
di Sessa, A.,
Pea, R. D., &
Songer, N. B. (1994). Can research on science learning and instruction inform standards for science education
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3 (1): 7–15.
10.1007/BF01575812 Google Scholar
- Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Education.
- National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council of the National Academies. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- National Assessment Governing Board. (2010). Technology and engineering literacy framework for the 2014 NAEP ( pre-publication edition). Washington, DC: WestEd.
- National Education Goals Panel. (1993). Promises to keep: Creating high standards for American students from the goals 3 and 4 technical planning group. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
- National Governor's Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http:www.corestandards.orgfrequently-asked-questions.
- Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- M. Q. Patton (Ed.) (2002). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from http:onlinelibrary.wiley.comdoi10.10020470013192.bsa514full.
- Pearson, G., & Young, T. A. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Pearson, G., Chandler, J., Dux, Diefes H. A., Hanson, J., & Kelly, T. (2010). P-12 Summit-Standards Panel. Panel presented at the 2010 P-12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Seaside, OR.
- Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1): 165–184.
- Richards, L. G. (2007). Getting the word out: Educators are promoting engineering to K-12 students. Prism, 16 (5), 47.
- Rutherford, J. (2009). Standards 2.0: New models for the new century alternatives to traditional content standards. In Standards for K-12 engineering education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Schutz, W. C. (1958). On categorizing qualitative data in content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 22 (4), 503. doi:10.1086/266824.
- L. Shepard, J. Hannaway, & E. Baker (Eds.) (2009). Standards, assessment and accountability, education policy white paper. Washington DC: National Academy of Education.
- Sneider, C., & Rosen, L. (2009). Towards a vision for engineering education in science and mathematics standards. In Standards for K-12 engineering education? Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Standards for Technological Literacy. (2007). Content for the study of technology. Technology Teacher, 59.
- Tate, D., Chandler, J., Fontenot, A. D., & Talkmitt, S. (2010). Matching pedagogical intent with engineering design process models for precollege education. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24 (3): 379–395.
- Taylor Research Group. (2000). Student and academic research study: Final quantitative study. New York, NY: American Institute of Public Accountants.
- I. R. Weiss, M. S. Knapp, K. S. Hollweg, & G. Burrill (Eds.) (2001). Investigating the Influence of Standards: A Framework for Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
