3D two-phase and non-isothermal modeling for PEM water electrolyzer: Heat and mass transfer characteristic investigation
Haoran Zhou
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorKai Meng
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorWenshang Chen
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ben Chen
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Correspondence
Ben Chen, Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorHaoran Zhou
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorKai Meng
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorWenshang Chen
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ben Chen
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China
Correspondence
Ben Chen, Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 52176200
Summary
A three-dimensional, two-phase, non-isothermal proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolyzer model was developed, aiming to reveal water and heat distribution characteristics and to explore the effects of various parameters on heat and mass transfer and performance of the electrolyzer. The results show that the electrolyzer performance depends on the combined effect of heat and mass, especially at high voltages. Although increasing the inlet velocity can accelerate the discharge of bubbles, it causes a larger temperature drop which degrades the performance. Increasing the inlet temperature can effectively improve the kinetic reaction rate of the catalyst layer and reduce the ohmic resistance of the membrane, which promotes the performance improvement. Decreasing the contact angle of anode gas diffusion layer (A-GDL) and increasing its porosity is beneficial to the transport of liquid water and improves the performance, but excessive porosity leads to a rapid increase in the ohmic resistance of A-GDL, and the optimal porosity range is 0.5 to 0.6. In addition, changes in A-GDL porosity and contact angle have little effect on temperature. Decreasing the thickness of the membrane can significantly improve the performance, but accelerate the increase of the membrane temperature at high voltage.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Doan TL, Lee HE, Shah SSH, et al. A review of the porous transport layer in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis. Int J Energy Res. 2021; 45: 14207-14220.
- 2Selamet ÖF, Acar MC, Mat MD, Kaplan Y. Effects of operating parameters on the performance of a high-pressure proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Energy Res. 2013; 37(5): 457-467.
- 3Teuku H, Alshami I, Goh J, Masdar MS, Loh KS. Review on bipolar plates for low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyzer. Int J Energy Res. 2021; 45(15): 20583-20600.
- 4Voronova A, Kim HJ, Jang JH, Park HY, Seo B. Effect of low voltage limit on degradation mechanism during high-frequency dynamic load in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Int J Energy Res. 2022; 46: 1-12. doi:10.1002/er.7953
- 5Olesen AC, Rømer C, Kær SK. A numerical study of the gas-liquid, two-phase flow maldistribution in the anode of a high pressure PEM water electrolysis cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016; 41(1): 52-68.
- 6Garcia-Navarro JC, Schulze M, Friedrich KA. Measuring and modeling mass transport losses in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Power Sources. 2019; 431: 189-204.
- 7Grigoriev SA, Kalinnikov AA, Millet P, Porembsky VI, Fateev VN. Mathematical modeling of high-pressure PEM water electrolysis. J Appl Electrochem. 2009; 40(5): 921-932.
- 8Aubras F, Deseure J, Kadjo JJA, et al. Two-dimensional model of low-pressure PEM electrolyser: two-phase flow regime, electrochemical modelling and experimental validation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017; 42(42): 26203-26216.
- 9Wang X, Wang Z, Feng Y, et al. Three-dimensional multiphase modeling of a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell with a new interdigitated-jet hole flow field. Sci China Technol Sci. 2022; 65: 1179-1192.
- 10Majasan JO, Cho JIS, Dedigama I, Tsaoulidis D, Shearing P, Brett DJL. Two-phase flow behaviour and performance of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysers: electrochemical and optical characterisation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018; 43(33): 15659-15672.
- 11Dedigama I, Angeli P, Ayers K, et al. In situ diagnostic techniques for characterisation of polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysers – flow visualisation and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39(9): 4468-4482.
- 12Ito H, Maeda T, Nakano A, et al. Experimental study on porous current collectors of PEM electrolyzers. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37(9): 7418-7428.
- 13Ito H, Maeda T, Nakano A, et al. Effect of flow regime of circulating water on a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35(18): 9550-9560.
- 14van der Merwe J, Uren K, van Schoor G, Bessarabov D. Characterisation tools development for PEM electrolysers. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39(26): 14212-14221.
- 15Martinson CA, van Schoor G, Uren KR, Bessarabov D. Characterisation of a PEM electrolyser using the current interrupt method. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39(36): 20865-20878.
- 16Awasthi A, Scott K, Basu S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36(22): 14779-14786.
- 17Abdin Z, Webb CJ, Gray EM. Modelling and simulation of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyser cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015; 40(39): 13243-13257.
- 18Chmielniak T, Remiorz L. Entropy analysis of hydrogen production in electrolytic processes. Energy. 2020; 211:118468.
- 19Chen Q, Wang Y, Yang F, Xu H. Two-dimensional multi-physics modeling of porous transport layer in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer for water splitting. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45(58): 32984-32994.
- 20Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E. Metal foams as flow distributors in comparison with serpentine and parallel flow fields in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells. Electrochim Acta. 2018; 290: 506-519.
- 21Toghyani S, Afshari E, Baniasadi E, Atyabi SA. Thermal and electrochemical analysis of different flow field patterns in a PEM electrolyzer. Electrochim Acta. 2018; 267: 234-245.
- 22Zhang Z, Xing X. Simulation and experiment of heat and mass transfer in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45(39): 20184-20193.
- 23Olesen AC, Frensch SH, Kær SK. Towards uniformly distributed heat, mass and charge: a flow field design study for high pressure and high current density operation of PEM electrolysis cells. Electrochim Acta. 2018; 293: 476-495.
- 24Wu L, Zhang G, Xie B, Tongsh C, Jiao K. Integration of the detailed channel two-phase flow into three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell. Int J Green Energy. 2021; 18(6): 541-555.
- 25Wang Z, Xu C, Wang X, Liao Z, Du X. Numerical investigation of water and temperature distributions in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell. Sci China Technol Sci. 2021; 64(7): 1555-1566.
- 26Ma Z, Witteman L, Wrubel JA, Bender G. A comprehensive modeling method for proton exchange membrane electrolyzer development. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46(34): 17627-17643.
- 27Song J, Guo H, Ye F, Ma CF. Mass transfer and cell performance of a unitized regenerative fuel cell with nonuniform depth channel in oxygen-side flow field. Int J Energy Res. 2019; 43(7): 2940-2962.
- 28Xing L, Liu X, Alaje T, Kumar R, Mamlouk M, Scott K. A two-phase flow and non-isothermal agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell. Energy. 2014; 73: 618-634.
- 29Xing L, Du S, Chen R, Mamlouk M, Scott K. Anode partial flooding modelling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: model development and validation. Energy. 2016; 96: 80-95.
- 30Chen H, Guo H, Ye F, Ma CF. A numerical study of orientated-type flow channels with porous-blocked baffles of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46(57): 29443-29458.
- 31Chen H, Guo H, Ye F, Ma CF. Improving two-phase mass transportation under non-Darcy flow effect in orientated-type flow channels of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46(41): 21600-21618.
- 32Si C, Lu G, Wang X-D, Lee D-J. Gas diffusion layer properties on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell: pc-s relationship with K-function. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016; 41(46): 21827-21837.
- 33Meng H. A two-phase non-isothermal mixed-domain PEM fuel cell model and its application to two-dimensional simulations. J Power Sources. 2007; 168(1): 218-228.
- 34Guo H, Guo Q, Ye F, Ma CF, Zhu X, Liao Q. Three-dimensional two-phase simulation of a unitized regenerative fuel cell during mode switching from electrolytic cell to fuel cell. Energ Conver Manage. 2019; 195: 989-1003.
- 35Han B, Mo J, Kang Z, Yang G, Barnhill W, Zhang F-Y. Modeling of two-phase transport in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells for hydrogen energy. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017; 42(7): 4478-4489.
- 36Guo Q, Guo H, Ye F, Ma CF, Liao Q, Zhu X. Heat and mass transfer in a unitized regenerative fuel cell during mode switching. Int J Energy Res. 2018; 43(7): 2678-2693.
- 37Chandesris M, Médeau V, Guillet N, Chelghoum S, Thoby D, Fouda-Onana F. Membrane degradation in PEM water electrolyzer: numerical modeling and experimental evidence of the influence of temperature and current density. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015; 40(3): 1353-1366.
- 38Xia L, Ni M, He Q, Xu Q, Cheng C. Optimization of gas diffusion layer in high temperature PEMFC with the focuses on thickness and porosity. Appl Energy. 2021; 300:117357.
- 39Jha V, Hariharan R, Krishnamurthy B. A 3 dimensional numerical model to study the effect of GDL porosity on high temperature PEM fuel cells. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2020; 161:120311.
- 40Meng K, Chen B, Zhou H, Shen J, Shen Z, Tu Z. Investigation on degradation mechanism of hydrogen–oxygen proton exchange membrane fuel cell under current cyclic loading. Energy. 2022; 242:123045.