Volume 97, Issue 6 pp. E758-E770
ORIGINAL STUDIES

Ischemic and bleeding risk after complex percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with or without high bleeding risk

Ko Yamamoto MD

Ko Yamamoto MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroki Shiomi MD

Corresponding Author

Hiroki Shiomi MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Correspondence

Hiroki Shiomi, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Takeshi Morimoto MD, MPH

Takeshi Morimoto MD, MPH

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yasuaki Takeji MD

Yasuaki Takeji MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yusuke Yoshikawa MD

Yusuke Yoshikawa MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masahiro Natsuaki MD

Masahiro Natsuaki MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hirotoshi Watanabe MD

Hirotoshi Watanabe MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Tomohisa Tada MD

Tomohisa Tada MD

Division of Cardiology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Junichi Tazaki MD

Junichi Tazaki MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kyohei Yamaji MD

Kyohei Yamaji MD

Division of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Toshihiro Tamura MD

Toshihiro Tamura MD

Department of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kenji Ando MD

Kenji Ando MD

Division of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazushige Kadota MD

Kazushige Kadota MD

Division of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yutaka Furukawa MD

Yutaka Furukawa MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshihisa Nakagawa MD

Yoshihisa Nakagawa MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takeshi Kimura MD

Takeshi Kimura MD

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 October 2020
Citations: 6

Funding information: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate utility of the complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) criteria in real-world practice.

Background

Applicability of procedural complexity criteria for risk stratification has not been adequately evaluated in real-world practice.

Methods

Among 13,087 patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2, the study population consisted of 7,871 patients after excluding patients with acute myocardial infarction and those without stent implantation. Complex PCI was defined as PCI, which fulfills at least one of the followings: three vessels treated, > = 3 stents implanted, > = 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with two stents, >60 mm total stent lengths, and target of chronic total occlusion.

Results

The cumulative incidences of and adjusted risks for the primary ischemic (myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke), and bleeding (GUSTO moderate/severe) endpoints were significantly higher in patients with complex PCI (N = 2,777 [35%]) than in those with noncomplex PCI (N = 5,094 [65%]) (15.4% vs. 10.9%, log-rank p < .001; odds ratio (OR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31–1.79, p < .001, and 11.9% vs. 9.9%, log-rank p = .004; OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05–1.46, p = .01). In the 30-day landmark analysis, the higher risks of patients with complex PCI for ischemic and major bleeding events were only seen within 30 days after PCI (ischemic; within 30 days: HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.79–2.69, p < .001; beyond 30 days: HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.92–1.34, p = .26, and bleeding; within 30 days: HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13–2.16, p = .007; beyond 30 days: HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.94–1.31, p = .22).

Conclusions

Patients with complex PCI as compared with patients with noncomplex PCI had a higher risk for both ischemic and bleeding events mainly within 30 days after PCI.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr Kimura serves on the advisory board of Abbott Vascular and Terumo, and receives research grants from Abbott Vascular. All the other authors report nothing to disclose related with this study.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The deidentified participant data will not be shared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.