Volume 133, Issue 41 pp. 22496-22505
Forschungsartikel

Key Features of Polyimide-Derived Carbon Molecular Sieves

Dr. Wulin Qiu

Dr. Wulin Qiu

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0100 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Johannes E. Leisen

Dr. Johannes E. Leisen

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0400 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Zhongyun Liu

Dr. Zhongyun Liu

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0100 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Wenying Quan

Dr. Wenying Quan

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0100 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Dr. William J. Koros

Corresponding Author

Prof. Dr. William J. Koros

School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0100 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2021
Citations: 2

Abstract

Carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes have impressive separation properties; however, both chemical and morphology structures need to be understood better. Here we characterize CMS with the simplest polyimide (PI) PMDA/pPDA (PMDA=pyromellitic dianhydride, pPDA=p-phenylenediamine), using FTIR, solid-state 15N-NMR and 13C-NMR, XPS, XRD, and Raman spectra to study chemical structure. We also compare gas separation properties for this CMS to a CMS derived from a more conventional PI precursor. The detailed characterization shows the presence of aromatic pyridinic, pyrrolic rings as well as graphitic, pyridonic components and a few other groups in both CMS types derived from the very different precursors. The CMS morphologies, while related to precursor and pyrolysis temperature details, show similarities consistent with a physical picture comprising distributed molecular sieving plate-like structures. These results assist in understanding diverse CMS membrane separation performance.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.