Volume 85, Issue 1 pp. 84-95
Research Article

Brain state–dependent stimulation boosts functional recovery following stroke

Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting PhD

Corresponding Author

Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting PhD

Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark

Address correspondence to Dr Mrachacz-Kersting, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7D3, 9220 Aalborg Øst, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Andrew J. T. Stevenson PhD

Andrew J. T. Stevenson PhD

Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Helle R. M. Jørgensen MR

Helle R. M. Jørgensen MR

Neuroenhed Nord, Regionshospital Nordjylland, Brønderslev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Kåre Eg Severinsen MD, PhD

Kåre Eg Severinsen MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Aliakbaryhosseinabadi PhD

Susan Aliakbaryhosseinabadi PhD

Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Ning Jiang PhD

Ning Jiang PhD

Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Dario Farina PhD

Dario Farina PhD

Department of Bioengineering, Centre for Neurotechnologies, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 November 2018
Citations: 43

Abstract

Objective

Adjuvant protocols devised to enhance motor recovery in subacute stroke patients have failed to show benefits with respect to classic therapeutic interventions. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of a novel brain state–dependent intervention based on known mechanisms of memory and learning that is integrated as part of the weekly rehabilitation program in subacute stroke patients.

Methods

Twenty-four hospitalized subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to 2 intervention groups: (1) the associative group received 30 pairings of a peripheral electrical nerve stimulus (ES) such that the generated afferent volley arrived precisely during the most active phase of the motor cortex as patients attempted to perform a movement; and (2) in the control group, the ES intensity was too low to generate a stimulation of the nerve. Functional (including the lower extremity Fugl–Meyer assessment [LE-FM; primary outcome measure]) and neurophysiological (changes in motor evoked potentials [MEPs]) assessments were performed prior to and following the intervention period.

Results

The associative group significantly improved functional recovery with respect to the control group (median [interquartile range] LE-FM improvement = 6.5 [3.5–8.25] and 3 [0.75–3], respectively; p = 0.029). Significant increases in MEP amplitude were seen following all sessions in the associative group only (p ≤ 0.006).

Interpretation

This is the first evidence of a clinical effect of a neuromodulatory intervention in the subacute phase of stroke. This was evident with relatively few repetitions in comparison to available techniques, making it a clinically viable approach. The results indicate the potential of the proposed neuromodulation system in daily clinical routine for stroke rehabilitation. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:84–95.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to report.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me