Volume 57, Issue 2 pp. 258-267

Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins, and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel

Krista L. Kilpadi

Krista L. Kilpadi

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294

Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
Pi-Ling Chang

Pi-Ling Chang

Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
Susan L. Bellis

Corresponding Author

Susan L. Bellis

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The implant material hydroxylapatite (HA) has been shown in numerous studies to be highly biocompatible and to osseointegrate well with existing bone; however, the molecular mechanisms at work behind this osseointegration remain largely unexplored. One possibility is that the implant, exposed to the patient's blood during surgery, adsorbs known cell adhesive proteins such as fibronectin and vitronectin from the serum. Osteoblast precursors could then adhere to these proteins through integrin-mediated mechanisms. In the present study, we have used a quantitative ELISA assay to test the hypothesis that hydroxylapatite will adsorb more fibronectin and vitronectin from serum than two commonly used hard-tissue materials, commercially pure titanium, and 316L stainless steel. We further used the ELISA, as well as a standard cell adhesion assay, to test the hypothesis that increased protein adsorption will lead to better binding of purified integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 and osteoblast precursor cells to the HA than to the metals. Our results show that fibronectin, vitronectin, α5β1, αvβ3, and osteoblast precursor cells do indeed bind better to HA than to the metals, suggesting that improved integrin-mediated cell binding may be one of the mechanisms leading to better clinical bone integration with HA-coated implants. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 258–267, 2001

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.