Hydroxylapatite binds more serum proteins, purified integrins, and osteoblast precursor cells than titanium or steel
Krista L. Kilpadi
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294
Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorPi-Ling Chang
Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Susan L. Bellis
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294Search for more papers by this authorKrista L. Kilpadi
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294
Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorPi-Ling Chang
Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Susan L. Bellis
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room 904 MCLM, 1918 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL 35294Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The implant material hydroxylapatite (HA) has been shown in numerous studies to be highly biocompatible and to osseointegrate well with existing bone; however, the molecular mechanisms at work behind this osseointegration remain largely unexplored. One possibility is that the implant, exposed to the patient's blood during surgery, adsorbs known cell adhesive proteins such as fibronectin and vitronectin from the serum. Osteoblast precursors could then adhere to these proteins through integrin-mediated mechanisms. In the present study, we have used a quantitative ELISA assay to test the hypothesis that hydroxylapatite will adsorb more fibronectin and vitronectin from serum than two commonly used hard-tissue materials, commercially pure titanium, and 316L stainless steel. We further used the ELISA, as well as a standard cell adhesion assay, to test the hypothesis that increased protein adsorption will lead to better binding of purified integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 and osteoblast precursor cells to the HA than to the metals. Our results show that fibronectin, vitronectin, α5β1, αvβ3, and osteoblast precursor cells do indeed bind better to HA than to the metals, suggesting that improved integrin-mediated cell binding may be one of the mechanisms leading to better clinical bone integration with HA-coated implants. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 57: 258–267, 2001
References
- 1Jarcho M. Retrospective analysis of hydroxyapatite development for oral implant applications. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 19–26.
- 2Kay JF. Calcium phosphate coatings for dental implants: current status and future potential. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 1–18.
- 3Lacefield WR. Current status of ceramic coatings for dental implants. Implant Dent 1998; 7: 315–322.
- 4Søballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Pedersen CM, Bünger C. Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press fit and noninterference fit. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61: 299–306.
- 5Chang YL, Lew D, Park JB, Keller JC. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 1096–1108.
- 6Takeshita F, Iyama S, Ayukawa Y, Akedo H, Suetsugu T. Study of bone formation around dense hydroxyapatite implants using light microscopy, image processing and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 317–322.
- 7Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA. Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 261–271.
- 8Coathup MJ, Bates P, Cool P, Walker PS, Blumenthal N, Cobb JP, Blunn GW. Osseo-mechanical induction of extra-cortical plates with reference to their surface properties and geometric designs. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 793–800.
- 9Karabuda C, Sandalli P, Yalcin S, Steflik DE, Parr GR. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: A pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 510–515.
- 10Fini M, Cigada A, Rondelli G, Chiesa R, Giardino R, Giavaresi G, Nicoli Aldini N, Torricelli P, Vicentini B. In vitro and in vivo behaviour of Ca- and P-enriched anodized titanium. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1587–1594.
- 11Pazzaglia UE, Brossa F, Zatti G, Chiesa R, Andrini L. The relevance of hydroxyapatite and spongious titanium coatings in fixation of cementless stems. An experimental comparative study in rat femur employing histological and microangiographic techniques. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 279–285.
- 12Tisdel CL, Goldberg VM, Parr JA, Bensusan JS, Staikoff LS, Stevenson S. The influence of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 159–171.
- 13Stephenson PK, Freeman MA, Revell PA, Germain J, Tuke M, Pirie CJ. The effect of hydroxyapatite coating on ingrowth of bone into cavities in an implant. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6: 51–58.
- 14Golec TS, Krauser JT. Long-term retrospective studies on hydroxyapatite-coated endosteal and subperiosteal implants. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 39–65.
- 15Cook SD, Enis J, Armstrong D, Lisecki E. Early clinical results with the hydroxyapatite-coated porous LSF Total Hip System. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 247–255.
- 16Dorr LD, Smith C. Clinical results from the Calcitite-coated press fit APR hip system. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 239–246.
- 17Manley MT, Koch R. Clinical results with the hydroxyapatite-coated Omnifit hip stem. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 257–262.
- 18Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 1023–1029.
- 19Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. The effect of hydroxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1665–1672.
- 20Jarcho M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop 1981; 157: 259–278.
- 21Geesink RGT, de Groot K, Klein CPAT. Bonding of bone to apatite-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70: 17–22.
- 22de Lange GL, Donath K. Interface between bone tissue and implants of solid hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. Biomaterials 1989; 10: 121–125.
- 23Weinlaender M. Bone growth around dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1991; 35: 585–601.
- 24Reddi AH. Implant-stimulated interface reactions during collagenous bone matrix-induced bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res 1985; 19: 233–239.
- 25Pearson BS, Klebe RJ, Boyan BD, Moskowicz D. Comments on the clinical application of fibronectin in dentistry. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 515–517.
- 26Kornu R, Maloney WJ, Kelly MA, Smith RL. Osteoblast adhesion to orthopaedic implant alloys: Effects of cell adhesion molecules and diamond-like carbon coating. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 871–877.
- 27Schneider G, Burridge K. Formation of focal adhesions by osteoblasts adhering to different substrata. Exp Cell Res 1994; 214: 264–269.
- 28Degasne I, Baslé MF, Demais V, Huré G, Lesourd M, Grolleau B, Mercier L, Chappard D. Effects of roughness, fibronectin, and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells (SAOS-2) on titanium surfaces. Calcif Tissue Int 1999; 64: 499–507.
- 29Aplin AE, Howe A, Alahari SK, Juliano RL. Signal transduction and signal modulation by cell adhesion receptors: The role of integrins, cadherins, immunoglobulin-cell adhesion molecules, and selectins. Pharmacol Rev 1998; 50: 197–263.
- 30Gronowicz G, McCarthy MB. Response of human osteoblasts to implant materials: Integrin-mediated adhesion. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 878–887.
- 31Howlett CR, Evans MDM, Walsh WR, Johnson G, Steele JG. Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell culture. Biomaterials 1994; 15: 213–222.
- 32Pytela R, Pierschbacher, MD Ruoslahti, E. Identification and isolation of a 140 kd cell surface glycoprotein with properties expected of a fibronectin receptor. Cell 1985; 40: 191–198.
- 33Tamkun JW, DeSimone DW, Fonda D, Patel RS, Buck C, Horwitz AF, Hynes RO. Structure of integrin, a glycoprotein involved in the transmembrane linkage between fibronectin and actin. Cell 1986; 46: 271–282.
- 34Fath KR, Edgell C-JS, Burridge K. The distribution of distinct integrins in focal contacts is determined by the substratum composition. J Cell Sci 1989; 92: 67–75.
- 35Ebrahimpour A, Johnsson M, Richardson CF, Nancollas GH. The characterization of hydroxyapatite preparations. J Colloid Interf Sci 1993; 159: 158–163.
- 36Kilpadi DV, Raikar GN, Liu J, Lemons JE, Vohra Y, Gregory JC. Effect of surface treatment on unalloyed titanium implants: Spectroscopic analyses. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 646–659.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<646::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-D CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 37Landegren U. Measurement of cell numbers by means of endogenous enzyme hexosaminidase. Applications to detection of lymphokines and cell surface antigens. J Immunol Methods 1984; 67: 379–388.
- 38Puleo DA, Nanci A. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 2311–2321.
- 39Matsuura T, Hosokawa R, Okamoto K, Kimoto T, Akagawa Y. Diverse mechanisms of osteoblast spreading on hydroxyapatite and titanium. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1121–1127.
- 40Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 475–483.
- 41Garcia AJ, Ducheyne P, Boettiger D. Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 48–56.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<48::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-R CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 42Hayman EG, Pierschbacher MD, Suzuki S, Ruoslahti E. Vitronectin—A major cell attachment-promoting protein in fetal bovine serum. Exp Cell Res 1985; 160: 245–258.
- 43Steele JG, McFarland C, Dalton BA, Johnson G, Evans MD, Howlett CR, Underwood PA. Attachment of human bone cells to tissue culture polystyrene and to unmodified polystyrene: The effect of surface chemistry upon initial cell attachment. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1993; 5: 245–257.
- 44McFarland CD, Mayer S, Scotchford C, Dalton BA, Steele JG, Downes S. Attachment of cultured human bone cells to novel polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1999; 44: 1–11.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199901)44:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-J CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 45Thomas CH, McFarland CD, Jenkins ML, Rezania A, Steele JG, Healy KE. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 37: 81–93.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199710)37:1<81::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-T CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 46Okamoto K, Matsuura T, Hosokawa R, Akagawa Y. RGD peptides regulate the specific adhesion scheme of osteoblasts to hydroxyapatite but not to titanium. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 481–487.
- 47Ozawa S, Kasugai S. Evaluation of implant materials (hydroxyapatite, glass-ceramics titanium) in rat bone marrow stromal cell culture. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 23–29.
- 48Wilke A, Orth J, Lomb M, Fuhrmann R, Kienapfel H, Griss P, Franke RP. Biocompatibility analysis of different biomaterials in human bone marrow cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 301–306.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<301::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-O CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 49Pan J, Liao H, Leygraf C, Thierry D, Li J. Variation of oxide films on titanium induced by osteoblast-like cell culture and the influence of an H2O2 pretreatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 244–256.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199805)40:2<244::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-L CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 50Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2219–2232.
- 51Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 302–310.
- 52Schmidt C, Ignatius AA, Claes LE. Proliferation and differentiation parameters of human osteoblasts on titanium and steel surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 209–215.
- 53Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 137–146.
- 54Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992; 101: 209–217.
- 55Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noel B, Dufresne E, Judas D, Iost A, Hardouin P. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 49: 155–166.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<155::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 56Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: Clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 439–449.