Volume 19, Issue 1 pp. 87-95
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical efficacy and safety of pemetrexed with or without either Bevacizumab or Pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non–small cell carcinoma

Wang Chun Kwok

Wang Chun Kwok

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Search for more papers by this author
Tan Fong Cheong

Tan Fong Cheong

Department of Pneumology, Centro Hospitalar Conde De Sao Januario, Estrada do Visconde de S Januario, Macau, SAR

Search for more papers by this author
Ka Yan Chiang

Ka Yan Chiang

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Search for more papers by this author
James Chung Man Ho

James Chung Man Ho

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Search for more papers by this author
David Chi Leung Lam

David Chi Leung Lam

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Search for more papers by this author
Mary Sau Man Ip

Mary Sau Man Ip

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Search for more papers by this author
Terence Chi Chun Tam

Corresponding Author

Terence Chi Chun Tam

Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Correspondence

Terence Chi Chun Tam, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 April 2022

Guarantor of the article: Dr. Terence Chi Chun Tam

Abstract

Background

Pemetrexed was approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in combination with platinum for the treatment of advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and malignant mesothelioma. Bevacizumab and pembrolizumab can be added to chemotherapy for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with benefits but there has not been any dedicated head-to-head comparison between pembrolizumab-pemetrexed-platinum (PAC) and bevacizumab-pemetrexed-platinum (BAC) on their efficacy and safety.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted in Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong. The study included 451 patients with advanced stage nonsquamous NSCLC that received first-line pemetrexed and platinum with or without bevacizumab or pembrolizumab. Patients who received pemetrexed-platinum (AC) were compared with those who received PAC and BAC. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The median PFS for patients that received PAC was significantly longer than those who received BAC and AC (9 months vs. 6.8 months vs. 4.8 months, p < 0.05 among all three groups), with OR of 0.578 (95% CI, 0.343–0.976; p = 0.040) and 0.430 (95% CI, 0.273–0.675; p < 0.001) when compared to BAC and AC, respectively. Patients who received PAC also had a higher disease control rate and higher likelihood to receive continuation maintenance therapy than those on AC. There is no statistically significant difference in the grade 3 to 4 toxicity among the three treatment groups.

Conclusions

Although both regimens are superior to pemetrexed-platinum alone, data from this retrospective single center study suggested a better PFS in  advanced stage nonsquamous NSCLC patient treated with first-line pembrolizumab-pemetrexed-platinum than bevacizumab-pemetrexed-platinum without an obvious increase in significant toxicity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.