H-bond network optimization in protein–protein complexes: Are all-atom force field scores enough?
Diego Masone
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorIsrael Cabeza de Vaca
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCarles Pons
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJuan Fernandez Recio
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Victor Guallar
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
c/ Jordi Girona 29, NEXUS II Building, 08034 Barcelona, Spain===Search for more papers by this authorDiego Masone
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorIsrael Cabeza de Vaca
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCarles Pons
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorJuan Fernandez Recio
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Victor Guallar
Joint BSC-IRB Research Program in Computational Biology. Barcelona, Spain Supercomputing Center, c/ Jordi Girona 29, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
c/ Jordi Girona 29, NEXUS II Building, 08034 Barcelona, Spain===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Structural prediction of protein–protein complexes given the structures of the two interacting compounds in their unbound state is a key problem in biophysics. In addition to the problem of sampling of near-native orientations, one of the modeling main difficulties is to discriminate true from false positives. Here, we present a hierarchical protocol for docking refinement able to discriminate near native poses from a group of docking candidates. The main idea is to combine an efficient sampling of the full system hydrogen bond network and side chains, together with an all-atom force field and a surface generalized born implicit solvent. We tested our method on a set of twenty two complexes containing a near-native solution within the top 100 docking poses, obtaining a near native solution as the top pose in 70% of the cases. We show that all atom force fields optimized H-bond networks do improve significantly state of the art scoring functions. Proteins 2011. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfofig1.pdf465.4 KB | Supporting Information Figure 1 |
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfofig2.pdf267.6 KB | Supporting Information Figure 2 |
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfofig3.pdf169.7 KB | Supporting Information Figure 3 |
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfofig4.pdf590.3 KB | Supporting Information Figure 4 |
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfotab1.pdf28 KB | Supporting Information Table 1 |
PROT_23239_sm_suppinfotab2.pdf281.4 KB | Supporting Information Table 2 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Dominguez C,Boelens R,Bonvin AMJJ. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical and/or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 2003; 125: 1731–1737.
- 2 Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci 2003; 12: 1271–1282.
- 3 Mintseris J,Pierce B,Wiehe K,Anderson R,Chen R,Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007; 69: 511–520.
- 4 Mendez R,Leplae R,De Maria L,Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003; 52: 51–67.
- 5 Mendez R,Leplae R,Lensink MF,Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005; 60: 150–169.
- 6 Lensink MF,Méndez R,Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 2007; 69: 704–18.
- 7 Borrelli KW,Cossins B,Guallar V. Exploring hierarchical refinement techniques for induced fit docking with protein and ligand flexibility. J Comp Chem 2010; 31: 1224–1235.
- 8 Borrelli KW,Vitalis A,Alcantara R,Guallar V. Protein energy landscape exploration. A novel Monte Carlo technique. Implications on camphor ligand binding. J Chem Theory Comput 2005; 6: 1304–1311.
- 9 Cheng TM,Blundell TL,Fernandez-Recio J. pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2007; 68: 503–515.
- 10 Pons C,Grosdidier S,Solernou A,Pérez-Cano L,Fernández-Recio J. Present and future challenges and limitations in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2010; 78: 95–108.
- 11 May A,Zacharias M. Energy minimization in low-frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein-protein docking. Proteins 2008; 70: 794–809.
- 12 May A,Sieker F,Zacharias M. How to efficiently include receptor flexibility during computational docking. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 2008; 4: 143–153.
- 13 Bahadur RP,Zacharias M. The interface of protein-protein complexes: analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions. Cellul Mol Life Sci 2008; 65: 1059–1072.
- 14 Wang C,Bradley P,Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 2007; 373: 503–519.
- 15 Gabb HA,Jackson RM,Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics, and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997; 272: 106–120.
- 16 Mintseris J,Wiehe K,Pierce B,Anderson R,Chen R,Janin J,Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark 2.0: an update. Proteins 2005; 60: 214–216.
- 17 Hwang H,Vreven T,Janin J,Weng Z. Protein–protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins 2010; 78: 3111–3114.
- 18 Jacobson MP,Friesner RA,Xiang Z,Honig B. On the role of crystal packing forces in determining protein sidechain conformations. J Mol Biol 2002; 320: 597–608.
- 19 Jacobson MP,Pincus DL,Rapp CS,Day TJF,Honig B,Shaw DE,Friesner RA. A hierarchical approach to all-atom loop prediction. Proteins 2004; 55: 351–367.
- 20 Li X,Jacobson MP,Zhu K,Zhao S,Friesner RA. Assignment of polar states for protein amino acid residues using an interaction cluster decomposition algorithm and its application to high resolution protein structure modeling. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2007; 66: 824–837.
- 21 Yu Z,Jacobson MP,Josovitz J,Rapp CS,Friesner RA. First-shell solvation of ion pairs: correction of systematic errors in implicit solvent models. J Phys Chem B 2004; 108: 6643–6654.
- 22
Bahar I,Atilgan AR,Jernigan RL,Erman B.
Understanding the recognition of protein structural classes by amino acid composition.
Proteins
1997;
29:
172–185.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199710)29:2<172::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 23 May A,Zacharias M. Protein ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking. J Med Chem 2008; 51: 3499–3506.
- 24 Tama F,Sanejouand H. Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. Protein Eng 2001; 14: 1–6.